Four NYT Journalists Missing in Libya

Anthony Shadid

This is very disturbing.

Four New York Times journalists disappeared while reporting on fighting in Libya, the newspaper said Wednesday.

Editors at the newspaper said they last heard from the journalists on Tuesday as they were covering the retreat of rebels from the town of Ajdabiya. Libyan officials told the newspaper they are trying to locate the four, executive editor Bill Keller said in a statement.

“We are grateful to the Libyan government for their assurance that if our journalists were captured they would be released promptly and unharmed,” Keller said.

The missing journalists are Pulitzer-Prize-winning reporter Anthony Shadid, the newspaper’s Beirut bureau chief; Stephen Farrell, a reporter and videographer; and photographers Tyler Hicks and Lynsey Addario. In 2009, Farrell was kidnapped by the Taliban and later rescued by British commandos.

Anthony Shadid has won two Pulitzer Prizes, including one in 2010 for reporting on Iraq at the Washington Post.

Lynsey Addario

Lynsey Addario is a brilliant photographer who was a 2009 recipient of a MacArthur “genius” grant. You can view some of her work here and here.

According to CNN,

Libyan government forces said Wednesday that they have no information about where the journalists may be and that, if they were picked up by the Libyan military, they would be returned to Tripoli.

CNN quotes from an e-mail Addario sent to CNN correspondent Ivan Watson on Monday:

Addario called the Libya story “one of the most dangerous” of her career.

The e-mail said, “qaddafi’s forces heading back east, and the rebels are surrendering along the way…so exhausted. this story has been one of the most dangerous i have ever covered. getting bombed from the air and by land, with no cover, and no flack and helmet.”

Of the other missing writer and photography, CNN says:

Farrell routinely reports from Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq. Before joining The New York Times in 2007, he worked for the Times of London. In April 2004, he was kidnapped on assignment in Iraq.

Hicks, a staffer for the paper, is based in Istanbul and has served as an embed in Afghanistan.

Tyler Hicks

Here is a recent post at the NYT Lens blog, with photos by Tyler Hicks along with his reflections on covering the Libyan conflict.

Stephen Farrell was taken prisoner by the Taliban in 2009. The Guardian has a report about the British soldier who died rescuing Farrell in Afghanistan.

Stephen Farrell

There is some good news. Guardian UK journalist Abdul-Ahad has been freed.

Abdul-Ahad, an Iraqi national, and Andrei Netto, a Brazilian journalist, were taken into custody on 2 March.

They were held in a prison outside Tripoli after being picked up in Sabratha, a coastal town.

Netto was released last week, but Abdul-Ahad, an award-winning correspondent was held until Wednesday.

Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger has said that Abdul-Ahad “is safely out of Libya”.

The recent conflicts in the Middle East have been dangerous for journalists. I only hope that these four fine journalists will soon be found safe and unhurt.


14 Comments on “Four NYT Journalists Missing in Libya”

  1. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    I’m really worried about what will happen to the opposition forces in Libya. It looks like Gaddafi will remain in power, thanks in great part to our cowardly president.

    • TheRock's avatar TheRock says:

      When Gaddafi retains control of that country, there will be a secret war on the initial organizers of the protest. They will die horrible painful deaths. But hey, we have a black president that is for change…

      Asshat.

      Hillary 2012

    • minkoffminx's avatar Minkoff Minx says:

      This is frightening news, the lack of leadership in any of these urgent matters…have you seen the response from Carney when Jake Tapper asked about Japan Nuclear crisis?

      RealClearPolitics – Video – WH’s Carney To Tapper: “You Have Reporters In Japan”

      JAKE TAPPER, ABC NEWS: “What is going on over there right now? We have not heard the latest information from the NRC or the Japanese government and apparently there has been something that has happened in the last few hours.”

      CARNEY, WH Press Secretary: “Well, it is clearly a crisis. There is clearly –”

      TAPPER: “– what is specifically going on?”

      CARNEY: “Again, I am standing here at the White House, I think you have reporters in Japan, you have reporters including ones here that could get the technical detailed information on what we know from the NRC, from the Department of Energy –”

      “It’s up to the media, not the government?” Tapper asked in response to Carney dismissing his question.

      “No, no I just referred to government agencies that can provide technical information…” Carney responded.

      • Woman Voter's avatar Woman Voter says:

        It is upsetting to have a president go do FUN things when the world is in crisis, yea, Twittie will say he doesn’t wear his emotions out in the open but honestly someone that cares doesn’t do that, he knew that going in.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      Gaddafi thinks they’re going to let him get away with any thing. He’s acting with impunity for good reason.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        UN still hasn’t made up its mind on the no fly zone as of today’s meeting.

        Negotiations among members of the U.N. Security Council ended Wednesday without consensus on a draft resolution authorizing a No-Fly Zone over Libya, where forces loyal to leader Moammar Gadhafi are bearing down on rebel strongholds in the eastern part of the country. Russia pushed for a separate cease-fire resolution, while the United States said the council might need to consider measures that go beyond a No-Fly Zone.

        After the day-long consultations, U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice told reporters that Washington wants a broad range of actions that will effectively protect civilians and increase the pressure on the Gadhafi regime to stop the killing and allow the Libyan people to express themselves freely and peacefully, but she did not detail what those measures might be.

        “We are discussing very seriously and leading efforts in the Council around a range of actions that we believe could be effective in protecting civilians — those include discussion of a No-Fly Zone. But the U.S. view is that we need to be prepared to contemplate steps that include, but perhaps go beyond, a No-Fly Zone. At this point, as the situation on the ground has evolved, and as a No-Fly Zone has inherent limitations in terms of protection of civilians at immediate risk,” she said.

  2. paper doll's avatar paper doll says:

    for some reason we did not step in. The reason has to be oil…the opposition forces in Libya had to be appear to about to win without help for us to consider changing sides …thanks in large part to us, they did not win. Gaddafi’s “success” shows other dictators the way and we showed we will stand down…and actually I think we wanted an Arab uprising to be checked…We let this happen… for whatever reason

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      My hypothesis is that he doesn’t want to spend the money or endanger any more troops while he’s in a Presidential campaign.

    • Seriously's avatar Seriously says:

      Bingo. I feel like he’s aware that this will all be forgotten by election time. If the democracy movement is stopped in its tracks and dissidents in other countries get the message then it’s win-win for him and the human costs are a small price to pay for “stability.” He does not want to be running while the region is exploding and he’s the hapless fool working the spread on Butler vs. UNLV.

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Red Cross pulls out of Benghazi, fearing Gaddafi attack.

    Meanwhile, the US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, told the BBC in Cairo that the Libyan leader seemed “determined to turn the clock back” and kill as many civilians as possible.

    Mrs Clinton said she was confident a decision would be made very soon by the international community to protect the Libyan people. She said authorisation through the UN Security Council was key, and insisted there should be Arab participation and leadership in any action.

    “Many different actions are being considered,” she added. “Yes, a no-fly zone, but others as well to enable the protection of Libyan citizens against their own leader, who seems determined to turn the clock back and kill as many of them as possible.”

    Asked about targeted strikes, she said all options were on the table.

    Wouldn’t it be better to do something before Gaddafi murders a half-million people?