Soylent Orange

The next Speaker of the House appears to be full of himself and ‘it’.   Here’s a sample headline form the column The Capitolist at Politics Daily: John Boehner Calls Vote on Middle-Class-Only Tax Cut ‘Chicken Crap’.  Yup, that’s fairly succinct.

Although no Democrats have agreed with Republicans to make the Bush tax cuts permanent for everyone, 31 moderate House Democrats signed a letter this week calling for a temporary extension of the tax cuts for higher incomes while the country continues to fight its way out of recession.

“I’m tying to catch my breath so I don’t refer to this maneuver that’s going on today as chicken crap. But this is nonsense, right?” Boehner said. “The election was one month ago. We’re 23 months from the next election and the games have already started to set up the next election.”

The source of Boehner’s ire was a House vote earlier Thursday that will prevent Republicans from offering their own bill to make all of the Bush tax cuts permanent for all Americans, including the highest earners, when the full chamber considers the middle-class cuts later in the day. The House voted 213 to 203 to vote only on the middle-class tax proposal, with 32 Democrats voting with the Republicans to keep the process open.

Earlier, Rep. David Drier (R-Calif.), who offered the Republican alternative, called the Democrats’ plans to vote only on their bill “a joke.”

“I think it’s very evident that this House could, with a majority vote, ensure that we don’t increase taxes on any Americans during these very troubling, difficult economic times,” Drier said. “The fact of the matter is that any member of this House that votes in favor of the measure before us is voting for a tax increase. They are voting in favor of increasing taxes on American businesses and investors.”

No Rep. Drier, you’re voting to return tax levels for the extraordinarily rich back to the extraordinarily job-abundant and budget-balanced Clinton years.   There is absolutely no evidence that those tax cuts created jobs and there’s no evidence that not extending them to the richest will harm the economy.  This is especially true since corporate profits are attaining record levels and corporate executives are getting record bonuses while we also maintain an incredibly unacceptable unemployment rate. You’re expanding the deficit for your donor’s interests.  We’re not buying your B.S. for one moment.

So, where is our illustrious POTUS on this?  The ONE every one was waiting for? Try Dana Bash’s CNN Political ticker headline on for size:  Tax deal getting close, Democrats worried Obama may cave. Now, that’ s leadership that can!!!

Multiple congressional Democratic sources tell CNN that a compromise to extend all Bush-era tax cuts temporarily is getting close, and that there is increasing concern among Democratic lawmakers that the White House will not fight hard enough to get Democratic priorities in return.

“The goose is cooked,” said one senior Democratic source, “the question is what the larger deal is going to look like.”

Many Democrats are unhappy at the prospect of giving up on their goal of permanently extending tax cuts only for those making $250,000 and less. Sources in both parties say a deal in the works would extend all expiring Bush era tax cuts for all income levels for two or three years.

In exchange, Democrats are hoping to squeeze out of Republicans a wish list of concessions. Democratic sources say that list generally includes: A lengthy extension of unemployment benefits, without having to find offsets to pay for them; extending college tuition tax credits set to expire at the end of the year; extending the so-called “make work pay” tax credits also expiring December 31st; and the HIRE act, tax credits for businesses that hire unemployed workers.

So, it comes down to Let’s Make a Deal for middle class livelihoods by maintaining the status quo for the aristocracy.  We get the kibble, they get the banquet.

More from Politico on what’s likely to happen come January when Agent Orange actually gets the gavel. Ask not on whom the gavel falls, it falls on you.

House Republicans seem intent on blowing up the staid appropriations process when they take power in January — potentially upending the old bulls in both parties who have spent decades building their power over the federal budget.

The plans include slicing and dicing appropriations bills into dozens of smaller, bite-size pieces — making it easier to kill or slash unpopular agencies. Other proposals include statutory spending caps, weekly votes on spending cuts and other reforms to ensure spending bills aren’t sneakily passed under special rules.
On some level, their plans may create a sense of organized chaos on the House floor — picture dozens of votes on dozens of federal program cuts and likely gridlock on spending bills. And don’t forget that a lot of these efforts will die with a Democratic-led Senate and a Democrat in the White House.

Once again, it’s the worst government that corporate money buys working to make our lives miserable.

Breaking NEWS: The house just passed tax cuts for those families making up to $250,000.  The measure is expected to die in the Senate.



34 Comments on “Soylent Orange”

  1. minkoffminx's avatar Minkoff Minx says:

    BREAKING NEWS: House of Representatives Passes Middle Class Tax Cut Extension

    I am trying to find more, but Fox News is reporting this….now it goes to the Senate.

  2. House Censure Vote on Rangel is coming up soon.

  3. minkoffminx's avatar Minkoff Minx says:

    On the cat food commission report, Coburn, Crapo Support Debt Panel Report, when I saw this article come through on the memorandum feed…I thought the headline read Cockburn and Crapo…

    The deficit-reduction commission sure isn’t having a deficit of votes, at least so far.

    Sen. Tom Coburn (R., Okla.) speaks during the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform December meeting on Capitol Hill Wednesday. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
    Republican Sens. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Mike Crapo of Idaho shocked many on Thursday when they said they’d vote for a proposal unveiled Wednesday by Democrat Erskine Bowles and Republican Alan Simpson, the co-chairmen of the White House’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform.

    The support of Messrs. Coburn and Crapo means the report, which would overhaul the tax code and cut spending throughout the government, now has nine votes in support and two votes against, with seven commission members undeclared. All votes are due Friday morning. If the report gets 14 votes, the House and Senate could vote on the package early next year and potentially put parts of it into policy.

    So far, Reps. Jan Schakowsky (D. Ill.) and Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) have said they’ll vote against the plan.

    If you are keeping a scorecard at home, the undeclared votes are former labor leader Andy Stern, Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.), Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R., Texas), Rep. David Camp (R., Mich.), Rep. John Spratt (D., S.C.), Sen. Max Baucus (D., Mont.), and Rep. Xavier Becerra (D., Calif.).

  4. BREAKING Just now: Speaker Pelosi just censured Rangel.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      I think what they are doing to Rangel is disgusting! He already lost his chairmanship. That was huge.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      That’s just not right.

    • It’s not right at all. I was disappointed in Rangel for quite some time when I found out, because it’s just never pleasant to have that veil removed , but then this process played out so political in recent months. Rotten and imho he’s obviously a scapegoat for a convergence of interests here.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        They never censured DeLay and he’s been found guilty of all kinds of things.

      • Pilgrim's avatar Pilgrim says:

        I think of a certain politician nobody here would know who said “Everybody hates me except the people.”

        I think of Bill Clinton, who suffered serious, deserved oprobrium. But look where he is now.

        And I think of Charlie Rangel. Not quite everybody hates him: the people out there don’t hate him.

        In the long run, Charlie’s rep will be as good or better than the characters who went in for overkill.

        At least I hope so, and so I believe.

  5. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    I love the title of this post.

  6. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Catfood Commission recommends death panels:

    The plan leaves in place Obama’s signature health care law expanding coverage to more than 30 million uninsured, but it would repeal a new long-term care program included in the legislation, calling it “financially unsound.”

    It would gradually phase out the federal tax break for job-based health plans, a change that would force workers and their families to seek out cost-conscious insurance. Labor unions, which have given up wage increases to secure better coverage, are adamantly opposed.

    There are even bigger changes in the proposal. Sarah Palin take note:

    For the first time, the government would set — and enforce — an overall budget for Medicare, Medicaid and other federal programs that cover more than 100 million people, from Alzheimer’s patients in nursing homes to premature babies in hospital intensive care.

    Palin attracted wide attention by denouncing nonexistent “death panels” in Obama’s overhaul, but a fixed budget as the commissioners propose could lead to denial of payment for medical care in some circumstances.

    [….]

    Many seniors would face an increase in cost-sharing for medical services.

    The deficit commission found that Medicare’s co-payments are low in most cases, encouraging overtreatment and overuse. Revamping cost-sharing would raise $110 billion through 2020. In return, seniors would get an annual cost-sharing limit of $7,500, stop-loss protection that isn’t currently offered under traditional Medicare.

    The proposal would also take on so-called Medigap plans, supplemental insurance that many seniors purchase to plug holes in Medicare. Such plans would no longer be able to offer wraparound coverage that insulates beneficiaries from nearly all cost-sharing. That would raise an additional $38 billion through 2020.

    “They are asking sick people to pay more in terms of cost-sharing,” said John Rother, AARP’s top health policy expert. “You are a Social Security beneficiary living on $15,000 a year, and they want you to pay up to $7,500? We are talking about bankrupting people. This doesn’t fly in the real world.”

  7. fiscalliberal's avatar fiscalliberal says:

    Dak – interesting article in Bloomberg

    China Is `Scared’ U.S. Policy Is Debasing Currency, Rogoff, Rickards Say

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-12-02/china-is-scared-u-s-policy-is-debasing-currency-rogoff-rickards-say.html

    I think this says that the China investment in our bonds is devaluing – could this be the confirmation of the currency dispute / war?

    Could this mean interest will go up on our national debt held by off shore countries

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      No the interest rate for national debt depends on the going interest rates which the FED is holding low and could continue to do so.

      China doesn’t like the decrease in the dollar’s value because of the way they peg currency to be worth less than ours. They have a lot of problems right now with inflation and a black market for currency because they’re trying to do the impossible. Peg currency, restrict capital flows, and have independent monetary policy. That’s called the Impossible Trilemma. They’re having trouble with hot money too. It’s forcing them to choose between pegging their currency and floating its value or experiencing these problems. This effectively checks their beggar thy neighbor policy that leeches growth from other countries through exports. It means they have to stimulate demand in their own country rather than snatch ours. They’re not keen on that.

      • fiscalliberal's avatar fiscalliberal says:

        If memory serves me right, China pulled 2 Billion out of Fannie and Freddie and invested in short term Treasuries. In general they have shifted from long term to short term treasuries gaining flexibility. I think that triggered the Fannie and Freddy take over. I think Paulson talked about it in his book

        If they now start pulling their money, the FED would have to make up by printing more money and purchasing treasuries through the investment banks. I suspect that gets people nervous from inflation which is absolutely not the problem now.

        Also – is China stimulating demand with infrastructure spending into the interior?

        The term “State Capitalism” seems to be gaining prominance. Has that been a subject in economics? Of course Communism and Socialism is a form of State Capitalism, but the recent Chineese brand seems to be expanded into the capital markets which seems to be much more effective. They get forign capital to build their industry to enable thier export profits

        Do we have academics that can discuss State Capitalism? I suspect our government is not capable of discussing it.

        Complex subject, but I think you are the gal that can help us unravel this stuff.

        • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

          Yes, state capitalism is getting some play in some circles but not the real mainstream journals yet. China’s not stimulating demand yet like it could because of the inflation problem but they are better than they were about that. A lot of folks are still studying the liberalization occurring right now in the Asian countries like Vietnam. That has more play in the US journals.

  8. Branjor's avatar Thursday's Child says:

    OT: Just noticed, with some surprise, the Confluence included in the links here. Went to the Confluence and saw Sky Dancing included in their links, with equal surprise.
    Well good, I am glad SD and TC are not sworn enemies!

  9. Boo Radly's avatar Boo Radly says:

    I missed watching ‘The Kennedy Detail’ series starting on the Discovery Channel last night. The program features interviews with JFK and Jackie Kennedy’s secret service detail. It’s based on the book by Gerald Blaine.

    Going to go watch it now at 9 ET. Been gone, have not read much – dealing with mine own little toxic oil spill courtesy of my oil company spraying the outside of my home and several shrubs with #2 oil – a little more than 10 gals. Gawd it smells. bbl