Georgia on my Mind

Russian tanks are pushing farther into the Georgian Republic while the U.S. scrambles to airlift Georgian troops out of Afghanistan back home.  It seems the young republic has been cut into half.  U.S. citizens are being evacuated.  While the Russians deny any desire to occupy the country, it appears that diplomacy is required.  There have been many calls for cease fires but the Russians are not reacting to any proposal.

Meanwhile, Barack Obama is vacationing in Hawaii.

All of this couldn’t be better news for the McCain Campaign.  The Obama campaign’s first press release over the Russian invasion was a bit too much we are the world.  He ‘strongly’ condemned the ‘outbreak of violence’ and asked for restraint from both Georgia and Russia.

“I strongly condemn the outbreak of violence in Georgia, and urge an immediate end to armed conflict. Now is the time for Georgia and Russia to show restraint, and to avoid an escalation to full scale war. Georgia’s territorial integrity must be respected. All sides should enter into direct talks on behalf of stability in Georgia, and the United States, the United Nations Security Council, and the international community should fully support a peaceful resolution to this crisis.”

I’d just like to say Senator Obama, if some one invaded and or bombed the United States that I would hope we wouldn’t show restraint. I’d hope we’d kick the invaders into the next dimension. Also, if attacking a sovereign nation isn’t an act of full scale war, what is?

Obama responded later with a more strongly worded statement that finally identified there was a bad guy in this conflict.

“I condemn Russia’s aggressive actions and reiterate my call for an immediate ceasefire… Russia must stop its bombing campaign, cease flights of Russian aircraft in Georgian airspace, and withdraw its ground forces from Georgia.”

This has led to callbacks to Senator Clintons’s ad about that phone call came at 3 a.m. It  appears the final Obama approach comes 24 hours after the call with revision.  This re-statement moment had the feel of the my pet goat moment after 9-11 and the McCain Camp is said to be salivating over drawing similar analogies.

Contrast with McCain’s Statement below:

STATEMENT BY JOHN MCCAIN ON THE CRISIS IN GEORGIA
For Immediate Release Contact: Press Office
Monday, August 11, 2008 703-650-5550
ARLINGTON, VA – Today, in Erie, Pennsylvania, U.S. Senator John McCain delivered the following statement regarding the current conflict between Georgia and Russia:

“Americans wishing to spend August vacationing with their families or watching the Olympics may wonder why their newspapers and television screens are filled with images of war in the small country of Georgia. Concerns about what occurs there might seem distant and unrelated to the many other interests America has around the world. And yet Russian aggression against Georgia is both a matter of urgent moral and strategic importance to the United States of America.

“Georgia is an ancient country, at the crossroads of Eastern Europe and Central Asia, and one of the world’s first nations to adopt Christianity as an official religion. After a brief period of independence following the Russian revolution, the Red Army forced Georgia to join the Soviet Union in 1922. As the Soviet Union crumbled at the end of the Cold War, Georgia regained its independence in 1991, but its early years were marked by instability, corruption, and economic crises.

“Following fraudulent parliamentary elections in 2003, a peaceful, democratic revolution took place, led by the U.S.-educated lawyer Mikheil Saakashvili. The Rose Revolution changed things dramatically and, following his election, President Saakashvili embarked on a series of wide-ranging and successful reforms. I’ve met with President Saakashvili many times, including during several trips to Georgia.

“What the people of Georgia have accomplished – in terms of democratic governance, a Western orientation, and domestic reform – is nothing short of remarkable. That makes Russia’s recent actions against the Georgians all the more alarming. In the face of Russian aggression, the very existence of independent Georgia – and the survival of its democratically-elected government – are at stake.

“In recent days Moscow has sent its tanks and troops across the internationally recognized border into the Georgian region of South Ossetia. Statements by Moscow that it was merely aiding the Ossetians are belied by reports of Russian troops in the region of Abkhazia, repeated Russian bombing raids across Georgia, and reports of a de facto Russian naval blockade of the Georgian coast. Whatever tensions and hostilities might have existed between Georgians and Ossetians, they in no way justify Moscow’s path of violent aggression. Russian actions, in clear violation of international law, have no place in 21st century Europe.

“The implications of Russian actions go beyond their threat to the territorial integrity and independence of a democratic Georgia. Russia is using violence against Georgia, in part, to intimidate other neighbors – such as Ukraine – for choosing to associate with the West and adhering to Western political and economic values. As such, the fate of Georgia should be of grave concern to Americans and all people who welcomed the end of a divided of Europe, and the independence of former Soviet republics. The international response to this crisis will determine how Russia manages its relationships with other neighbors. We have other important strategic interests at stake in Georgia, especially the continued flow of oil through the Baku-Tblisi-Ceyhan pipeline, which Russia attempted to bomb in recent days; the operation of a critical communication and trade route from Georgia through Azerbaijan and Central Asia; and the integrity and influence of NATO, whose members reaffirmed last April the territorial integrity, independence, and sovereignty of Georgia.

“Yesterday Georgia withdrew its troops from South Ossetia and offered a ceasefire. The Russians responded by bombing the civilian airport in Georgia’s capital, Tblisi, and by stepping up its offensive in Abkhazia. This pattern of attack appears aimed not at restoring any status quo ante in South Ossetia, but rather at toppling the democratically elected government of Georgia. This should be unacceptable to all the democratic countries of the world, and should draw us together in universal condemnation of Russian aggression.

“Russian President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin must understand the severe, long-term negative consequences that their government’s actions will have for Russia’s relationship with the U.S. and Europe. It is time we moved forward with a number of steps.

“The United States and our allies should continue efforts to bring a resolution before the UN Security Council condemning Russian aggression, noting the withdrawal of Georgian troops from South Ossetia, and calling for an immediate ceasefire and the withdrawal of Russian troops from Georgian territory. We should move ahead with the resolution despite Russian veto threats, and submit Russia to the court of world public opinion.

“NATO’s North Atlantic Council should convene in emergency session to demand a ceasefire and begin discussions on both the deployment of an international peacekeeping force to South Ossetia and the implications for NATO’s future relationship with Russia, a Partnership for Peace nation. NATO’s decision to withhold a Membership Action Plan for Georgia might have been viewed as a green light by Russia for its attacks on Georgia, and I urge the NATO allies to revisit the decision.

“The Secretary of State should begin high-level diplomacy, including visiting Europe, to establish a common Euro-Atlantic position aimed at ending the war and supporting the independence of Georgia. With the same aim, the U.S. should coordinate with our partners in Germany, France, and Britain, to seek an emergency meeting of the G-7 foreign ministers to discuss the current crisis. The visit of French President Sarkozy to Moscow this week is a welcome expression of transatlantic activism.

“Working with allied partners, the U.S. should immediately consult with the Ukrainian government and other concerned countries on steps to secure their continued independence. This is particularly important as a number of Russian Black Sea fleet vessels currently in Georgian territorial waters are stationed at Russia’s base in the Ukrainian Crimea.

“The U.S. should work with Azerbaijan and Turkey, and other interested friends, to develop plans to strengthen the security of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline.

“The U.S. should send immediate economic and humanitarian assistance to help mitigate the impact the invasion has had on the people of Georgia.
Our united purpose should be to persuade the Russian government to cease its attacks, withdraw its troops, and enter into negotiations with Georgia. We must remind Russia’s leaders that the benefits they enjoy from being part of the civilized world require their respect for the values, stability and peace of that world. World history is often made in remote, obscure countries. It is being made in Georgia today. It is the responsibility of the leading nations of the world to ensure that history continues to be a record of humanity’s progress toward respecting the values and security of free people.

“Thank you.”

John McCain’s strongest polling numbers have come from his credentials in foreign policy.  He’s been talking tough and inferring prescience with past discussion of distrust of Putin’s Russia.  One of my favorite McCain moments was him making fun of the President’s having looked into Putin’s eyes and his soul.  McCain said all he saw in Putin’s eyes was KGB.   McCain has been 9% up in the polls above Obama in the belief that he could do better in times of a foreign policy crisis.

While the Obama campaign is now relying on Bill RIchardson to speculate on the Obama approach to this world crisis on TV, McCain’s been on TV directly talking tough.  This can only make Obama look more Dubya-like as they announce he’s getting ‘briefed’ on the situation.  Hawaii, however, makes for a more exotic background than the Crawford Ranch Texas.

This could be the opportunity McCain needs to solidify support among independents and conservative democrats who are traditionally swayed by issues of national defense.  The need for knowledge of the geopolitical history as well as the diplomatic approaches used from administration to administration has never been more keenly brought into focus. The difference in experience between the presidential candidates is at full contrast.  I remember watching the Democratic Debates and being fascinated by the detail at which several of the Senators could come up with plans and answers.  When we got to the one-on-one debates, it became amazingly obvious that Hillary got to answer the wonky foreign policy questions while Obama just sat and waited to respond, mostly with well, I agree with Senator Clinton.  These were the moments immortalized in the SNL debate skits.  For me,  they were the defining moment when I said, I could never vote for Obama for president.  Now, we’re at another one of those watersheds.  Perhaps Obama will just go walk on to the Georgian battle field and spread the hopium, then the skies will open, rainbows will appear, and a heavenly host will lead us all in good rousing verse or two of Kumbaya.


DNC Assimilated by the Oborg

Thursday’s Washington Post stated that the hopium-infused platform of the DNC was the final frontier of assimilation of the DNC by the Oborg.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/08/07/by_jonathan_weisman_barack_oba_1.html

Democrats Release Platform

By Jonathan Weisman

Barack Obama’s takeover of the Democratic Party is nearly complete.

A draft of the Democratic National Committee’s 2008 platform was sent
this morning to platform committee members, and aside from some nods
to the losers, Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards, the 54-page
document reads like a compilation of Sen. Obama’s stump speeches.
There is a section on fatherhood, a definition of patriotism (not
only to declare our love of this nation, but to show it), a section
detailing Obama’s newly rejiggered economic stimulus plan, a call for
more service, through an expanded AmeriCorps and Peace Corps, and a
whole lot of hope.

“It is time for a change,” declares the draft’s preamble.

I don’t know how you feel, but I’m not sure I need the democratic party to define parenthood or patriotism for me.  I look to the DNC platform to define programs and governance approaches.  Senator FeelGood’s patronizing lectures to Americans have now been infused into the platform.  There is also the pander section for Edwards and Clinton backers.

For Edwards, who has bigger issues to deal with at the moment, the DNC makes good on Obama’s pledge to him to elevate poverty eradication as a policy goal. “Working together,” the platform states, “we can cut poverty in half within ten years.”

And Clinton is the star of the platform’s section on expanded opportunities for women.

“”We have produced [the] first woman Secretary of State, the first woman Speaker of the House of Representatives, and, in 2008, [with] Hillary Rodham Clinton, the first woman in American history to win presidential primaries in out nation,” the platform states.

Again,  I feel patronized.  After the nasty campaign tricks used on Senator Clinton, the appalling performance of Speaker Pelosi, and then a nod to Clinton-ally Secretary Albright, I’m not sure how to re-act positively to this.  It appears to be a second hand compliment rather than a true statement of support for women in high places. There are strong statements supporting women’s reproductive rights as well as statements against government encroachments on privacy and constitutional rights.  These too, sound hollow after recent actions and statements by Senator Obama.  Afterall, he just voted to protect those telecoms that helped President Bush spy on American citizens and also mentioned that he thinks women tend to get THIRD term abortions because they feel blue.

Some one needs to step in and save the democratic party from itself.  Unfortunately, I think that could have been Bill Clinton but with this Stalinesque purge, it’s unlikely the hopium-addicted will come out of the fog before the fall election.  By then, they’ll be screaming every one’s a racist as we transition from President Bush to President McCain.


Chris Humes: Red State Road Trip Day 15

http://www.redstateroadtrip.com/day15.htm

The greatest thing about the internet and the explosion of video and graphic interfaces is that it has let many creative voices be heard.  This is especially true of documentary filmmakers who have had very few venues to show their films.  I thought I’d highlight one such filmmaker today and his excellent short video on the Gulf Coast three years after Katrina.  (Use the link.  The picture is just a screen shot)


Hurricane Obama vears away from New Orleans!

There’s a big anniversary coming up in my life.  It was about three years ago a little low pressure wave left the coast of Africa that later would change my life and my neighbor’s lives for ever.  Hurricane Katrina was an experience I wouldn’t wish on any one.  Most levels of government have been trying to make nice to us to make up for the horrid response we got following the disaster.  While the kat house didn’t flood and sustained minor wind damage, I can tell you I will NEVER be the same person after that experience.

So, here’s some news from the ninth ward home front.

First, New Orleans put in a pitch to hold the presidential debates and we were rejected because the deciders on the committee said we weren’t ready for prime time yet.  So, Google and New Orleans got together to sponsor a town hall meeting here to highlight New Orleans three years after Katrina nearly wiped us off the face of the map.  We still need exposure and tourist dollars.  So, it would make a nice gesture to do something here, right?  So first, local item is hot off the Greta Wire:

The New Orleans Snub By One Presidential Candidate???

Just in: I was just tipped off that New Orleans (yes, the unfortunate home of Hurricane Katrina…) invited Senator McCain and Senator Obama to do a town hall meeting co-sponsored by New Orleans and Google. As you might imagine, with all that has happened with Katrina, New Orleans is doing all that it can to attract Presidential candidates, commerce etc to help rebuild and revitalize the area.

Senator McCain accepted the New Orleans / Google town hall meeting 6 weeks ago…and Senator Obama? Well..he just answered yesterday and he declined ….the reason? his campaign says he will agree only to do the Commission on Presidential debates….

If  Louisiana is considered by the DNC to be a swing state right now, and New Orleans is the epicenter of Democrats in the state, this is not getting off on the right foot.  This will come right after the snub to visit us for Tavis Smiley’s State of the Black Union during the primary.  I’m not sure if he’s just taking the AA community down here for granted but I’m going to be interested in reading local responses to this.

The next interesting thing was Senator Landrieu’s huge move to disassociate herself from the Obama campaign as reported by Marc Ambinder.  Landrieu stayed neutral for a very long time in the national race.  She knows how much she owes to Hillary Clinton and depends heavily on Clinton-type voters around the state for her seat. She also depends heavily on AA voters.  Her opponent saw an opportunity to link her to the campaign and readied some negative ads.  He’s been running some doozies on her.

http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/08/landreiu_keeping_some_distance.php

Landrieu Keeping Some Distance From Obama

06 Aug 2008 01:43 pm

Heartbroken Bush campaign ex-officio Matthew Dowd wrote on ABC News.com recently that Barack Obama was running behind his party nationally and therefore that the party’s congressional candidates ought to be wary about running with him.

Sen. Mary Landrieu is keeping her distance.

l1.JPG

Last Thursday, an automated Google search for “Mary Landrieu,” produced a link to a page on Obama;’s website touting an upcoming Washington, D.C fundraiser for Obama. An aide to John Kennedy, Landrieu’s Republican challenger, sent it to reporters. Just two hours later, the link went down, only to reappear with Landrieu’s name removed without notice.

Co-hosting presidential fundraisers are among the most vetted events on any politician’s calendars – sitting senators don’t “accidentally” let themselves get listed as a co-host  for a presidential fundraiser. So far as I am aware, Landrieu has not attended a political event with Obama.

l2.JPG

A Landrieu spokesman e-mails:

The Obama event is part of a day-long series of DNC events focused on women’s political involvement.  Sen. Landrieu is scheduled to attend the event as part of the day-long series of events, but is not hosting.  She was never scheduled to host, so we imagine that somebody made an error and accidently listed her as a host.

If Obama is counting on Lousiana for its electoral votes, I’d say this is a development that should give him pause.

Meanwhile, here’s some of my Katrina Pictures to remind you of the pain we’ve been through down here.

Lower Ninth Ward.
More Lower Ninth Ward

More Lower Ninth Ward--Fats Domino's House

These are from the Lower Ninth Ward which is right across the Canal from me.  My 18 year old daughter –then 15 took these pictures.  Emily put together a montage to take to Nebraska to share with folks up there.  Just about every thing you see here is now gone.  The ninth ward is basically weeds and cement slabs with a few stairs to no where.

Who Really Supports the Bush-Cheney Energy Plan?

John McCain seems to be gaining traction on Barack Obama in a large part due to the energy crisis.  Senator Obama stumbled by suggesting that we could save the amount of fuel generated by new off-cost drilling simply by maintaining the correct tire pressure for our cars. I remember this energy saving tip was provided as a public service announcement by Mario Andretti back in the day.    For some one who is running to solve some of our country’s biggest problems, it simply didn’t seem too, well presidential. It seems more like a topic for Hints from Heloise.

The Obama campaign must have gotten the message that these household hints during speeches aren’t a substitute for specifics on national energy policy when the McCamp camp started handing out tire gauges with ‘Obama’s energy plan’ emblazoned on the sides.  Obama immediately responded with both an ad and a very long speech.  The few specifics layed out by the plan aren’t very earthshattering. I already attacked one of his suggestions as simply bad economics in my blog yesterday.  Any tax placed on the sellers of a price-sensitive product will be passed on immediately to the buyers.  So, the suggestion of a $1000 tax rebate to the taxpayers based on windfall profits will just eventually come from higher prices at the pump.  So, you get a rebate with one hand and you get higher gas prices with the other hand.  Since we’ve never seen an Obama transcript, I’ll just have to speculate that he never took Economics 101 or 102.  I should know because I’m a professor of economics and I teach those classes.

I reviewed Obama’s ad yesterday and found one attack on McCain.  This was the charge that McCain is simply supporting the Bush-Cheney Energy plan.  I checked into the voting records for the 2005 Bush Cheney Energy plan and found something astounding.  McCain voted against it.  Obama voted for it.  It didn’t take long for McCain to pick up on this.  i heard a McCain speach today in Lima, Ohio pointing out that Obama voted FOR the Bush-Cheney Energy plan while he voted against it.  The Bush-Cheney Energy plan was generally seen at the time as a series of huge handouts to petroleum interests.   So, how is it that Obama voted for it and McCain voted against it?

McCain policy advisor Dough Holtz-Eaken had this to say in a press release reprinted by the Chicago Sun-Times.

While distorting John McCain’s vision for energy independence, Barack Obama is also misleading the American people when he says John McCain supported the Bush-Cheney energy policy. Let there be no mistake: the only candidate who voted to give tax breaks to Big Oil is Barack Obama when he supported the 2005 Bush-Cheney energy bill that gave $2.8 billion in subsidies to the oil companies. John McCain voted against this bill for the very reason that he opposed these tax breaks to oil companies and as president he will ensure their repeal. While he may decry them on the campaign trail, Barack Obama had no problem standing side-by-side with the oil companies while in the United States Senate.

http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2008/08/mccain_policy_advisor_doug_hol.html

I’ve seen the ad playing on CNN.  This has to be a misstep by the Obama campaign.  Why would you actually bring attention to such an obviously questionable charge?  A quick check of campaign contributors also shows that Obama has also taken a lot of money from Big Oil as has the McCain campaign.  Why would you charge your opponent with being in the pocket of big oil with such an obvious elephant in your own room?  (And this could be that Obama, at the time, voted more Republican than McCain) Senator Obama must think the press will cover for him by not pointing out the obvious about the contradictions in his behavior and campaign rhetoric.

Taking on high oil prices is going to play much better in Peoria and Omaha than giving speeches in front of German Victory monuments shouting out with “I am a citizen of the world”.  I can really see a McCain ad coming with this contrast set out for those of us living in the big fly over.

Once again, we see the Audacity of Hype.

The McCain Ad:

and the Obama response:

Again, linking McCain to the Bush-Cheney Energy plan when McCain voted against it and Obama voted for it, seems an odd tactic.  I think this will back fire big time if there’s actually some discussion of the facts-on-the ground.  I’m sure the RNC is just waiting for the DNC convention to nominate this clearly in-over-his head candidate before the attack ads start in full.

Please, delegates, run away from an Obama nomination as quickly as possible.