Too Much Breaking News to Handle (Open Thread)

The younger brother is held up in a boat in the back yard of a Boston Suburb.  You can only wonder what’s going through his head and how his older brother got him into all this.  One part of Watertown, Mass has a bird’s eye view of history and tragedy.  Is this kid an accidental terrorist? Information on his brother indicates a piece of work that was on  the radar of the FBI two years ago andhad a police record of domestic violence. The one in the boat is an American citizen and seems to have the profile of a hapless pothead and shy kid looking for direction.  I can only imagine the simplification of this situation that will come from the small narrow minds of the right wing.  So, now we can debate how to frame two deadender brothers of an immigrant family vs. the Sandy Hook Shooter and all the rest of our troubled young men?  This seems a lot more like that kind of shooting to me than it does an event like 9-11.  Here’s hoping we can just get some real understanding on how to prevent these things and go beyond the memes of the day. How do these young men get so troubled that that go off and do horrible things like this?


93 Comments on “Too Much Breaking News to Handle (Open Thread)”

  1. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    There were a bunch of shots and now no sound and the helicopters have left. I think the guy must be dead.

    “Nothing is moving in the boat.”

    I’m watching local channel.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      Multiple law enforcement sources say this is the guy. Their goal is to take him alive. No one knows yet whether he’s still alive or not.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        I think every one has a sense his brother drug him into all of this and that he has some information that want badly.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Police asked people in nearby house to leave and let police set up inside their house. They have evacuated just about everyone on Franklin St.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Yes, I think that makes sense.

  2. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    I talked to my brother. My older nephew wanted to know what “terrorism” meant. They kind of went over what has been happening. Neither kid seems upset, and the younger one isn’t all that interested. He said something like “let me know if there’s anything to worry about.”

    I’m babysitting tomorrow night, so I’ll probably find out.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      They might wanna check the Mr. Rogers thing out on 9/11 … my friend Sam is using it for his 9 year old boy. He has started asking questions.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        I’m sure they’ve seen it, but so far neither of the kids is all that interested. It’s usually a mistake to offer too much info when kids aren’t asking for it.

        Part of it is that they are aware that bad things happen in the world. They have had relatives die, etc.

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Christopher G ‏@C_Goscinski 39m

    The suspect is gonna need a bigger boat.

  4. ecocatwoman's avatar ecocatwoman says:

    Although I have MSNBC running in the background, it’s gotten to the point where I don’t want to watch. I’ve had NPR on all day and it’s been non-stop about the missing suspect. They interviewed a couple of young women who went to school with him. He came to America when he was just 8 years old. He had friends and he was on the wrestling team. I’m convinced (soft-hearted?) that his older brother convinced him this was the right thing to do. I don’t know if I got this right, but it seems the brother is relatively new to the US, didn’t emigrate with the younger brother. Plus the older brother made a trip back to Chechnya (sp?) last year. I can’t help thinking this kid is scared & that the police – or one person – will take him out. I’m certainly not condoning what he & his brother did at the marathon or robbing the 7-11 or carjacking the SUV. I hope they take him alive. Yes, he should be punished but in an American court – he’s an American citizen. And then there is the guilt I’m feeling for feeling worried for him. I just can’t feel rage or an eye for an eye revenge. I’m going to turn on AMC and watch My Girl Friday and escape for a bit.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      The two brothers came here together with their mother. The older brother went back to spend about 6 mos. with his father who is ill, but other than that they have both been here for 10 years.

      Also, the police announced several hours ago, that the brothers did not rob the 7-11 or commit any armed robberies. It was a complete coincidence that the younger brother was seen on the 7-11 surveillance tape around the time someone else robbed it.

      I can’t believe how inaccurate the national cable channels are!!

      • BB, They said on MSNBC that Boston police removed the shelter in place order earlier?

        Is that right?

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        yeah, it seems they shoot the campus cop because they thought that he was after them since their pictures were out … what a press clustefuck!!!

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Yes they started the MBTA and removed the *request* to stay indoors shortly before they found the guy. Someone saw him in the boat and called it in.

        There wasn’t an order. It was just a request to stay indoors. People were walking around in Cambridge according to my brother. The corner stores were open too.

  5. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    To add to the horrible news this week there has been a 7.0 earthquake in China.

  6. They got him, he is alive.

  7. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Suspect 2 is in custody.

    • Oh BB, it is finally over.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Not really, at least here. Funerals to come, lots of people still hospitalized, and trying to figure out why they did it.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        I just hope he survives. I have to give the police credit for being patient and getting a negotiator to talk him into surrendering. If this were NYC or LA, he would be dead.

        • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

          yeah, along with a few houses in the area burning down and a more innocent people in the area dead than were killed by the bombs

      • Beata's avatar Beata says:

        The former FBI agent on CNN ( who has been quite good in his analysis ) says the suspect is being transported by police, not medics, so it would seem that his injuries are not serious.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        What houses burned down? I haven’t heard about it. Who else is dead beside the MIT cop and Suspect 1? Obviously, I missed some big stuff.

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        BB, you missed nothing, I believe Kat was speaking of what would have been the case in LA or NYC. The cops did a great job this time!

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        Oh, I understand now. I get the reference now. Sorry, Dak. Thanks Ralph!

  8. Fannie's avatar Fannie says:

    It’s over, he’s alive, and in custody……..medic’s called………….don’t know his condition. 8:42 pm.

  9. Beata's avatar Beata says:

    MSNBC: Suspect is alive and in custody. Medics checking him out. News sounds reliable.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      He was covered in blood, according to Channel 5.

      • Beata's avatar Beata says:

        MSNBC says he has a gunshot wound, “loss of blood”, is now in an ambulance on the way to hospital.

        I will leave the reporting to you, BB, since you have access to better local sources. The national news is too unreliable.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        They said he was at Mt. Auburn, but someone just said they may have decided to go to Mass General instead. That would mean he wasn’t in that bad shape.

        Wait, now they are ordering people off the sidewalk as if the ambulance might be arriving at Mt. Auburn. Sorry for the confusion.

  10. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Local reporters just got confirmation from LE that the kid is alive and on the way to the hospital. It sounds like he could make it.

  11. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    He’s going to Mt. Auburn hospital in Cambridge, which is just down the street from the crime scene.

  12. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    All the tea partiers who are cheering should be reminded that the cops, FBI, ATF, etc. are public employees.

    Now local TV gets the word that the suspect is conscious.

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      Local media waiting at hospital have seen lots of police cars but no ambulance. It should only have taken 5 mins., so they must have taken him in the back way or something.

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      I didn’t see a single tri-corner hat in that crowd of cheering people. Those cheers seem well earned. 🙂

  13. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    The ambulance just arrived at Mt. Auburn Hospital w/ Suspect 2 inside. 9:07PM

    That report was wrong–sorry. Now reporting the suspect is bleeding badly, but he is still alive and conscious.

  14. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Crowds are lining Mt. Auburn St. cheering for the ambulance and police.

    Father of Suspect 2 has been told that he son is still alive. Father tells his son “Tell the police everything. Be honest.”

  15. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Channel 5 just showed a picture of Suspect 2 inside the ambulance. He’s wearing an oxygen mask.

  16. Beata's avatar Beata says:

    Charles Pierce on MSNBC now.

  17. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    CBS News ‏@CBSNews 3m

    JUST IN: No Miranda warning being given to suspect because government is invoking the public safety exception, DOJ official says

    By By Constitutional rights . the kids gonna get some great lawyers now and what bout Jared Loughner who shot at a Congresswoman and killed how many?

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      okay, now I am advocating a regime change ..

    • I just saw drudge praising this decision. what the hell? My internet is very slow and showing signs of going down again. But the right wing is ridiculous as usual.

      • BROTHER BOMBERS: 1 DEAD; 1 CAPTURED…
        Hailed from Russia region near Chechnya….
        Bragged of Bombing…
        PROFILE: ‘WORLD VIEW, ISLAM’…
        Appears Sympathetic to Al Qaeda…

        BOSTON JIHAD

        That is the drudge headlines

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      I saw that, and I am angry. WTF?!

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        It went across MSNBC during the press conf. That has to be Obama’s decision. Asshole.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        “IT’s a federal issue,” the guy says. Public safety/acts of terrorism exception, says monster Carmen Ortiz. Murderer!

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      There are a few questions the bomber needs to answer. For instance, are other bombs planted around the city? As well as, are any accomplices involved? I’m conflicted about Mirandizing him right off the bat so he could lawyer up.

    • roofingbird's avatar roofingbird says:

      Yeah and unfortunately, even though inappropriate, Graham was right on his tweet. Obama named it terror in his news conference earlier this week, and here we are.

      I apologize Graham, now fix it.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        Do McCain and Graham realize the Military Commissions Act THAT THEY WROTE does not apply to citizens? http://bit.ly/ZyuwBw

      • roofingbird's avatar roofingbird says:

        I was looking at the FBI internal memo, I didn’t see anything distinguishing citizens from non citizens regarding Miranda. Right now I’m feeling a little set up because throughout the day there was such a careful attempt to define terror as an act designed to induce terror.

        Someone made the call to assign this as terror. Or Obama’s designation was enough.

        What happened in 1984 (Besides Orwell’s “Big Brother” and what a coincidence?!) that got this Miranda bypass authorized?

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        The decision in 1984 was based on a rape case. The police asked the suspect where he hid the gun and the suspect told him. Then the policeman read him his rights. SCOTUS upheld the arrest. The exception is only for public safety considerations. In the case of Suspect 2, they needed to find out if there were any other bombs planted or accomplices, as Ralph explained above. You can read about it in wikipedia–I put the relevant section in a comment earlier (below).

      • roofingbird's avatar roofingbird says:

        So it doesn’t have to be terrorism, just your garden variety dofus who might be hiding something scary.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        That was the court decision, acc. to what I read.

  18. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    It turns out that the “public safety exception” doesn’t mean he is treated like an enemy combatant. From Wikipedia:

    The Miranda rule is not, however, absolute. An exception exists in cases of “public safety”. This limited and case-specific exception allows certain unadvised statements (given without Miranda warnings) to be admissible into evidence at trial when they were elicited in circumstances where there was great danger to public safety.[8]

    The public safety exception derives from New York v. Quarles, a case in which the Supreme Court considered the admissibility of a statement elicited by a police officer who apprehended a rape suspect who was thought to be carrying a firearm. The arrest took place in a crowded grocery store. When the officer arrested the suspect, he found an empty shoulder holster, handcuffed the suspect, and asked him where the gun was. The suspect nodded in the direction of the gun (which was near some empty cartons) and said, “The gun is over there”. The Supreme Court found that such an unadvised statement was admissible in evidence because “[i]n a kaleidoscopic situation such as the one confronting these officers, where spontaneity rather than adherence to a police manual is necessarily the order of the day, the application of the exception we recognize today should not be made to depend on post hoc findings at a suppression hearing concerning the subjective motivation of the police officer”.[9] Thus, the jurisprudential rule of Miranda must yield in “a situation where concern for public safety must be paramount to adherence to the literal language of the prophylactic rules enunciated in Miranda”. The rule of Miranda is not, therefore, absolute and can be a bit more elastic in cases of public safety.[8]

    However the Boston PD wanted to Mirandize him because he’s no longer a threat to public safety. The decision was made at the Federal level.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      a kid that’s bleeding out is a public safety threat?

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      They found some other bombs. Maybe they didn’t find them all so they can’t be sure he isn’t a threat of some kind now.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      @ggreenwald: DOJ: we plan to question him “extensively” without Mirandizing him http://is.gd/5nENWA see here http://j.mp/ZyuycF

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        Here’s an FBI explainer on the “public safety exception” to Miranda http://flip.it/V399m

      • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

        The “public safety” exception to Miranda is a powerful tool with a modern application for law enforcement. When police officers are confronted by a concern for public safety, Miranda warnings need not be provided prior to asking questions directed at neutralizing an imminent threat, and voluntary statements made in response to such narrowly tailored questions can be admitted at trial. Once the questions turn from those designed to resolve the concern for safety to questions designed solely to elicit incriminating statements, the questioning falls outside the scope of the exception and within the traditional rules of Miranda.

        I completely object to anything outside the very narrow questions being asked without the Miranda warning.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        I thought the wiki entry I posted was a lot easier to understand. I still think it’s bullshit.

  19. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    War crime on video: Israeli soldiers use handcuffed Palestinian teen as human shield as they fire at protestors http://bit.ly/12tpcjP

  20. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    oh, and Carmen Ortiz will be the prosecutor?

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      I’m just hoping they don’t torture him. I wish MA was in charge of the prosecution instead of the feds.

  21. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    omigawd, I just agreed with Glenn Beck

    Glenn Beck ‏@glennbeck 10m

    We love you Boston! Praise God. How about praising God by reading an American, despicable as he is, HIS RIGHTS!

  22. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    “What terrorists want is to terrorize people; Americans always oblige” http://m.newyorker.com/online/blogs/newsdesk/2013/04/dzhokhar-tsarnaev-is-found.html

    • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

      Why should all “Americans” be blamed for what the feds do? I’m an American and I didn’t vote for it. Anyway, the kid has been read his rights now, thank goodness.

  23. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    NBC reports that the FBI has read the suspect his Miranda rights.

    igorvolsky ‏@igorvolsky 1h
    NBC reports that suspect has been Mirandized by the FBI

    • RalphB's avatar RalphB says:

      Maybe he answered their narrow question about any remaining bombs? Or maybe the FBI decided fuck it. He will probably be arraigned no later than Monday, if not tomorrow, and would have an attorney present for that in any case. The kind of hysterical reactions have been a bit silly.

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        I haven’t been able to find any confirmation, but I found this at Think Progress.

        The FBI Cannot Indefinitely Delay Reading Tsarnaev His Miranda Rights
        Because the public safety exemption is rooted in the “need for answers to questions in a situation posing a threat to the public safety,” it is only temporary. Eventually, it may become clear that no such threats exist (or at least any that Tsarnaev is capable of providing information about). At that point, he must be read his Miranda rights even under the most lax plausible understanding of the exemption. Additionally, if law enforcement wishes to ask Tsarnaev questions geared towards gathering evidence to use against him at trial, they must read him his Miranda rights.

        The exception has been in effect since 1984.

    • Well thats a fucking relief!

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        The exception is only for a limited time and they can’t ask about anything they will use at trial.

  24. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Death toll in TX goes up to 14.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22219735

  25. roofingbird's avatar roofingbird says:

    You guys on the east coast must be exhausted. I know I’m tired. I’m calling it a night. Take care of yourselves. Ralph, and everyone else, you too.