Student Loans: Bubble, Bubble, Toil & Trouble
Posted: October 19, 2011 Filed under: education, unemployment | Tags: Sallie Mae, student loan bubble, student loans 15 Comments
I laughed pretty loudly when I opened an email from the university to my faculty account explaining how wonderful the increased retention numbers were looking! Our new funding formula from extortionist governor Bobby Jindal depends on graduating and retaining students. I guess they don’t have economists in that section of administration. Just look at the unemployment rate for the typical student population (16-24 year olds) and the decreasing labor force participation rate from August, 2011. You’ll see exactly what’s going on. Got no job? Where do you go to find money and hopefully place yourself higher up on the meat market ladder if businesses ever go back to hiring?
The number of unemployed youth in July 2011 was 4.1 million, down from 4.4 million a year ago. The youth unemployment rate declined by 1.0 percentage point over the year to 18.1 percent in July 2011, after hitting a record high for July in 2010. Among major demographic groups, unemployment rates were lower than a year earlier for young men (18.3 percent) and Asians (15.3 percent), while jobless rates were little changed for young women (17.8 percent), whites (15.9 percent), blacks (31.0 percent), and Hispanics (20.1 percent).
So, we’ve got the biggest numbers of young people since the baby boom with parents whose employment situation is not great and whose assets and real incomes have taken a major hit over the last ten years. We’ve got kids that can’t even find the usual kid jobs. What are they going to do but go for those student loans and hang at university as long as possible? This brings me to the next big bubble phenomenon–Student Loans–plus the next GSE that’s going to be seeing default rates sky rocket. That would be Sallie Mae.
The $1 trillion of outstanding loans means that Americans now owe more on student loans than on their credit cards. While students have been racking up educational loans, American consumers have been paying down credit cards and home loans.
The average full-time undergraduate student borrowed $4,963 in 2010, up 63 percent from a decade earlier, even after adjusting for inflation, the report says.
Meanwhile, with a greater loan burden, the percentage of borrowers that defaulted on their student debts also rose – from 6.7 percent in 2007 to 8.8 percent in 2009.
That gives a lot of credence to the argument that the next big bubble will be in student loans. Here’s an investor’s view point from seeking alpha from back in July. Should we all start hedge funds and short student loans? Well, for one thing. You can short sell for profit university’s stocks who thrive on churning loans and assume Sallie Mae will be a goner just like its buddies Fannie and Freddie. Dump their bonds and short them!
With the current state of the job market, many if not most of these unfortunate borrowers will not be able to pay off their debt with a lower than expected income. This trend is showing itself through increasing default rates of student loans. Three-year default rates have risen from 11.8% for loans issued in 2007 to 13.8% issued in 2008 (most recent data available). Meanwhile, the fundamental factors driving these defaults have not changed since.
Historically, investors have not worried about the default of these securities because of their explicit government guarantees through FFELP. In addition to this, student loans are the only debt that cannot be forgiven through bankruptcy. Student loan collectors have gone to the extent of garnishing wages and racking up penalties that can double the borrower’s debt in the name of “forgiveness” to maintain a return for bondholders.
This story sounds similar to housing: If the borrowers fail to pay, lenders seize the asset (house for a mortgage, garnished wages for student loans). The story will end the same way, as students lack the income to maintain their living expenses plus the debt or even just the interest payments if they are unemployed. The other option that students will begin to take more is moving abroad to avoid collectors. Financial distress will make it practical to exile oneself to avoid a lifetime of debt slavery. The combination of lower incomes for college grads and expatriation will increase the default rate to even high levels than current record rates.
So how do investors go about shorting the bubble in higher education? Ideally, the best way would be to buy credit default swaps on student loan asset-backed securities, which have a similar construction to the mortgage-backed securities that caused the last financial crisis. However, this strategy is not available to most readers. Average investors are better off short-selling the leading providers of student loans or for-profit universities, which have some of the highest default rates of student loans for any academic institution.
The leading student loan provider in the United States in the Sallie Mae corporation (SLM). It was launched as a government-sponsored enterprise (since privatized) similar to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae; it currently services and manages $180.4 billion of government-backed student loan debt. It’s also begun to issue private student loans as well. With a debt to equity ratio of 36, Sallie Mae is already on the edge of insolvency. A small drop in collections can amount to significantly levered losses to the company. If the student loan default rate increases to 20%, Sallie Mae will most likely not be able to survive. The continuing upward trend of student loan defaults will lead to either insolvency of Sallie Mae or a government takeover — which will both wipe out shareholders.
Above the Law even asked if there was any one out there left that even believed that this wasn’t a disaster waiting to happen. How’s this for harsh?
The problem is that our colleges and universities are charging a $100,000 to pump out the next generation of dog walkers. Sure, part of the fault lies with the people themselves; parents who let their 18-year-old children borrow a ton of money to go to an expensive private university to major in art history are no better than strung out crack mothers.
But the dean who sits there and says, “come study comparative literary criticism for the low, low price of $40,000 per year,” is the price-gouging drug dealer. These deans are pushing a product at a price point that they know is dangerous for most of their consumers.
This is what worries me. This is also from Above the Law and it mentions just how married you and yours going to be to that student loan. Not only that, but graduate students will have a much bigger balances to pay in the future thanks to an Obama sell-out on the deficit. Talk about setting people up for loan failure. Why not just pump the least able to pay for more money?
In the total debt ceiling cave-in that will mark Barack Obama as the most successful Republican president since Ronald Reagan, there was one cut that really illustrates how little the president cares for his young, college-educated constituents. To save about $26.3 billion dollars, the debt ceiling deal eliminates the graduate student loan subsidy. That means that law students (and other grad students) will continue accruing interest on their non-dischargeable educational loans throughout their graduate studies.
I can see why they call education the “silver bullet,” because education certainly seems like a surefire way to kill one’s economic future….
The graduate loan cut wasn’t the most ridiculous so-called compromise Obama made while John Boehner was pumping him like Richie Aprile did to Janice Soprano. But it is illustrative of the extent to which Obama has abandoned the young people who helped elect him so that he can court… well, I don’t know exactly what universe he lives in where he thinks a black Republican running as a pro-war Democrat wins a general election
Meanwhile back on the Planet of anecdotal evidence, we get these examples. Ask me about Doctor Daughter’s student loan debt or mine, for that matter. I got two degrees in the late 70’s and early 80s by working and that was it. I just couldn’t swing it this time. I now have student loan debt that would’ve bought me a Mercedes and I’m jobless and on the jobfree labor market. Sallie Mae’s like a loan shark too. They’re worse to deal with than the bookies in my neighborhood.
“I have ~$75k in student loans. I will default soon. My cosigner, my father, will be forced to take my loans. He will default as well. I’ve ruined my family because I tried to rise above my class,” writes one testimonial on the 99 percent website on Wednesday.
The 99 percent website is one of the places where the Occupy Wall Street movement first got its inspiration from.
“I am a young medical professional who BARELY makes it paycheck-to-paycheck because I have OVER $200,000.00 in student loan debt,” says another testimonial on the website Tuesday. “I pay almost $1,000 a month just in student loan repayment. I will have to do so for the next 30-years. How will I ever afford to buy a house, have children, or save for the future?”





It is just wrong for college degrees to be so expensive — yet to get any sort of job — a college degree seems to be a requirement. Either that or there are so many people with college degrees on the job market that employers can pick and choose from a well educated field.
Way back in the stone age when I got my degrees — in California it cost very little per quarter or semester. I was getting my MA when RayGun started his attack on the colleges. He and other conservatives blamed the anti Vietnam war movement on college students. Little did he and his fellow sadist jerks realize that the real motivator in the anti war movement were the service men and women who were witnesses to what the war was really about — a useless waste of money and lives.
Now the children of the baby boomers are paying the price — and I blame it all on RayGun and his war on colleges. His aim was to make a college education too expensive for the middle class and poor people who wanted a better life for their children.
Colleges during the Vietnam war era were often war zones where the cops were let loose to beat up students — they didn’t give a damned who they hit or aimed their guns at.
OWS — is a flash back to an earlier era. The cops were just a bad and corrupt — doing the bidding of the military industrial complex. Today the cops are owned by Wall street and Corporations.
College education — we need a well education population.
Anyway if I were back doing career counseling I’d suggest that students get training as plumbers — or some other money making trade and then work on a college degree over a number of years — as they can afford the classes.
That plan doesn’t work for most medical degrees. And this is where 0bama’s Health Insurance thing called 0bamacare went badly wrong. Medical students should have an option to have their education paid for — in exchange for x number of years of service in the Single Payer health care System.
The military has gotten doctors this way for decades. Pay for their education for x number of years of military service.
There are some fields in which you really have to start young.
The Public Health Service used to have a similar sort of deal for medical students who agreed to practice for a period of time in underserved areas. The program was ended in the Bush Administration.
Most states will pay off student loans still for doctors as long as they agree to go to rural and underserved areas.
New Mexico has bill boards along the highway — “New Mexico needs Doctors and Dentists”.
I’m guessing that the majority of OWS are students or recently graduated students.
I’m posting a link to an article about the massive spy camera network that seems to be owned by Wall Street and manned by the NYPD. I know nothing at all about exactly where these cameras and expensive spy networks are located or where the cameras are located.
Are these spy cameras aimed at OWS? Are individuals who are part of the OWS protest being logged, and added to “lists”?
So does this mean that anyone who dares to protest can now be added to a Wall Street owned black list?
This era is far more dangerous than the Vietnam war era.
http://www.readersupportednews.org/news-section2/316-20/7973-focus-wall-street-and-nypd-cooperate-in-super-spy-center
Wow, that’s pretty sad.
They want me to pay around $800 per month. There’s no way I can pay even 10% of that. The payback plan I signed up for is supposed to be based on your income, but no one has ever asked me if I have a job or how much income I have.
They just send me a payment book if I even dare to take a summer off. I don’t think they are reality based at all. They just set your payment based on what they want to pay the bondholders. The bonds are going to start defaulting or the government is going to have to pony it up. So, the bond holders will be paid but the students get to pay until the die and then their heirs get it from there.
Why Is College So Expensive?
http://www.npr.org/2011/10/19/141505658/why-is-college-so-expensive
The whole situation is just appalling. Here in Colorado, our flagship “public university” receives only 3.3% of its funding from the state. Students are graduating into a nonexistent job market with enormous, non-dischargeable debt loads. I don’t see how they’ll ever get out from under.
I got my degrees in the 70s — we paid a fraction of what today’s students are paying. They can’t pay the huge bills which is why they have to borrow at impossible to pay back loan rates.
Berkeley was one of the premiere Universities in the state. Stanford is private and back then was expensive. California has a public/private mix of colleges. There was also a great Junior college system — and many students opt to take their first two years at a Jr. college and then move on to a University or state college. Even Jr. colleges are expensive today — cost is per unit. Then there are the text books, lab fees, transportation fees etc. etc. etc.
Outstanding post…exactly. And even beyond the expense of the tuition…is the expense of the loan! I well remember on the campaign trail Hillary pointing out that her student loans were at 2 or 3 %!! Not 30%! and that something had to be done about it A society that charges 2-3% for a student loan believes in itself and its future and a society that charges 30% does not .
My wish is that OWS keeps dragging these issues forward and gives dems and republicans and media the self-awareness to get out of the road before they get run down.
Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don’t stand in the doorway
Don’t block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There’s a battle outside and it is ragin’
It’ll soon shake your windows and rattle your walls
For times they are a-changin’