Labor Day Blues
Posted: September 4, 2009 Filed under: U.S. Economy | Tags: FHA, payrolls, total hours worked, unemployment statistics Comments Off on Labor Day Blues
The release of the new unemployment data and labor market data was pretty much in keeping with expectations. MarketWatch reports that the unemployment rate is now at an 26 year high coming in at 9.7%. The drop in payroll numbers wasn’t as severe as it has been recently, but there are still troubling underlying factors.
Payrolls fell in most sectors of the economy except for health care. Total hours worked in the economy dropped by 0.3%, long-term unemployment worsened, and the number of people working just part time who wanted full-time work reached 9.1 million, up 278,000.
The number of people who’ve been out of work longer than six months nudged up to 5 million, representing about one-third of the unemployed.
An alternative measure of unemployment that includes discouraged workers and those forced to resort to part-time work rose to 16.8% from 16.3%, marking the highest on record dating back to 1995.
Average hourly earnings on the month rose 6 cents, or 0.3%, to $18.65 an hour. In the past year, average hourly earnings are up 2.6%.
Of the 271 industries as tracked by the Labor Department, 35% were adding workers in August, according to a survey of hundreds of thousands of business establishments.
Private-sector employment fell by 198,000 in August. Employment in the private-sector is now lower than it was 10 years ago
The duration of employment is some of the worst we’ve seen in a long time. That’s represented by the number of
people that have been out of work longer than six months. Also, the level of discouraged workers and people involuntarily working part time is incredibly high. This is reflected in the last fact which shows that the economy has taken back all of the jobs created over the last 10 years and then some. There is simply no where to go.
One of the other interesting details in the numbers was the loss of government jobs by 18,000. Only food, beverage, and petroleum industries increased along with health care. The loss of government job is a reflection of the softening in state economies that will no longer be able to plug funding gaps with federal stimulus checks. Shortly, the slash of state budgets around the country will begin to drive the unemployment rate higher.
You can tell that it will be awhile before this all turns around because the average workweek was unchanged at 33.1 hours. If employers aren’t fully utilizing their current staff, they certainly aren’t going to hire any more.
The bad job market has undoubtedly led to this bit of news too. Loan losses at the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) are so bad that there’s question of solvency. The WSJ reports we may be in for yet another bailout. This creates a double whammy because the agency insures loans for buyers with small downpayments and has be instrumental in a lot of the first time buy loans coming out of the stimulus plan.
In the past two years, the number of loans insured by the FHA has soared and its market share reached 23% in the second quarter, up from 2.7% in 2006, according to Inside Mortgage Finance. FHA-backed loans outstanding totaled $429 billion in fiscal 2008, a number projected to hit $627 billion this year.
Rising defaults have eaten through the FHA’s cushion. Some 7.8% of FHA loans at the end of the second quarter were 90 days late or more, or in foreclosure, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, a figure roughly equal to the national average for all loans. That is up from 5.4% a year ago.
Resulting FHA losses are offset by premiums paid by borrowers. Federal law says the FHA must maintain, after expected losses, reserves equal to at least 2% of the loans insured by the agency. The ratio last year was around 3%, down from 6.4% in 2007.
If its reserves fall short, the agency is obliged to notify Congress, which could spark a commotion over the extent to which the government is funding losses in the housing market. Some housing analysts have said losses might lead the FHA to pull back lending, which has helped boost flagging housing demand.
It appears that more and more federal programs geared to help ordinary Americans are on the ropes. This is especially tough since so many folks have lost their jobs, the number of hours they work, or are experiencing cuts in benefits and salary. There’s still a long way to go before this recession is over and we show any signs of a real recovery. Consider that we’ve lost all gains on assets and now all jobs created in the last 10 years. We’ve already got one lost decade under our belt. What’s in store to stop the next one?
digg!! share!!! tweet!!
Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Furl | Newsvine
Next Strategy: Declare Victory, Go Home
Posted: July 2, 2009 Filed under: Bailout Blues, Equity Markets, Global Financial Crisis, The Great Recession, U.S. Economy | Tags: Christine Romer, Hilda Solis, job markets, recovery propaganda, unemployment statistics 1 Comment
(kinda graphic video, you’ve been warned)
The economy just won’t drink the koolaid and behave. I wonder if that old Mission Accomplished banner is still lying around the White House basement ? After all, white house economics adviser Christina Romer, via the FT says she’s “upbeat on economy.” So, who do I believe: the Obama administration or my lying economist eyes?
The US economy will feel a substantial boost from the Obama administration’s emergency spending package over the next few months,says Christina Romer, a senior White House official, who has warned against tightening monetary and fiscal policy before recovery is well established.
Ms Romer, chairman of the US president’s council of economic advisers, told the Financial Times in an interview she was “more optimistic” that the economy was close to stabilisation.
But while hopeful that America could yet experience a V-shaped recovery, she said it was much too soon to begin tightening policy: “We do not want to repeat the mistake Japan made in the 1990s, when the moment things started to improve they tightened policy.”
Meanwhile, David Axelrod, a senior White House adviser, told NBC Television yesterday the administration would be open to further stimulus if needed. “Let’s see in the fall where we are, but right now we believe what we have done is adequate to the task. If more is needed, we’ll have that discussion.”
Ms Romer’s comments come as opposition Republicans step up their attacks on the $787bn fiscal stimulus, pointing out that it has not prevented unemployment from hitting a quarter-century high of 9.4 per cent.
Ms Romer said stimulus spending was “going to ramp up strongly through the summer and the fall”.
“We always knew we were not going to get all that much fiscal impact during the first five to six months. The big impact starts to hit from about now onwards,” she said.
Calculated Risk must not see what Christine sees in the numbers. If you still are in the dark as to how exactly bad the employment situation is, go check out their graphs. You can also follow my lying eyes over to the Washington Post where the headline and Neil Irwin’s headline: 467K Jobs Cut in June; Jobless Rate at 26-Year High. Come on guys!!! Drink koolaid or DIE!!!!
Employers kept slashing jobs at a furious pace in June as the unemployment rate edged ever closer to double-digit levels, undermining signs of progress in the economy, and making clear that the job market remains in terrible shape.
…
Wages, meanwhile, were little changed, with average weekly pay for non-managerial workers falling to $609.37, from $609.51. With many people losing their jobs, and those who remain at work making less money, American consumers will be hard-pressed to increase their spending later in the year, despite higher confidence and rising wealth through the stock market.
So, I know the job market always lags the economy, but please Christina, look at the last paragraph. Let’s go to the NY
Times. Here’s their nifty little graphic and here’s some of their reality-based commentary.
The losses for June brought the tally of jobs shed since the beginning of the recession to 6.5 million — a figure equivalent to the net job gains over the previous nine years.
“This is the only recession since the Great Depression to wipe out all jobs growth from the previous business cycle,” Heidi Shierholz, an economist at the labor-oriented Economic Policy Institute in Washington, said in a research note. She called this fact “a devastating benchmark for the workers of this country and a testament to both the enormity of the current crisis and to the extreme weakness of jobs growth from 2000 to 2007.”
Let me just say, that when 70% of the GDP of a country depends on household spending, none of this is good news. But hey, the koolaid club just keeps on spinning right here in the same NY Times article.
“We’re seeing a kind of leveling off here,” Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis said in an interview. “We would have done much worse had we not put the recovery plan in place.”
Early this year, the administration projected that the unemployment rate would peak near 8 percent with the stimulus in place. With joblessness already well above that target, some economists are arguing for another dose of government spending — a call Ms. Solis dismissed as premature. Much of the spending is still in the pipeline and trickling out slowly into the economy, particularly in construction projects that require government permits and planning, she said.
In offering the slow pace of stimulus spending as a partial explanation for higher unemployment, Ms. Solis effectively echoed the criticism that some leveled at the spending package when it was devised: that many of the projects would take too long to have their intended effect.
But Ms. Solis expressed assurances that the program was proceeding according to the administration’s plans.
“We’re making progress,” she said.
What are they on over there? Look at the Calculated Risk Graphs. (Ones that I’ve put up here before but are still being updated in a progressively negative direction.) Those graphs put this downturn into the perspective of all the last downturns since World War 2. Even a petulant clown with fear of numbers can’t miss the trend! This isn’t progress unless you call minusculely less down progress! I’m not seeing any turning points!
The next move has to be for them to declare victory in the rose garden or send us all koolaid with our unemployment checks. Do they really think we are all this dumb?
Digg!!! Tweet!!! Share!!!
Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Furl | Newsvine
Job Markets Keep Getting Worse
Posted: March 6, 2009 Filed under: Uncategorized | Tags: economics, labor markets, unemployment statistics 5 Comments
651,000 jobs disappeared during the month of February according to the BLS. This was the fourth month in a row with job losses over 600,000. The unemployment rate is now at levels unseen since 1983. We have an official unemployment rate of 8.1% but that belies a lot of stories including the number of people forced into part time jobs, the number of people so discouraged they have given up hope of finding a job, and the sectors and people who find themselves most vulnerable to this awful economy. I’m not a labor economist and don’t do research in the area so I’m basically limited to what I know from teaching and attending my own basic economics classes. The most important basic thing to know about labor markets is to dig in there into the break downs behind the unemployment rate for the full story.
Unemployment hits people differently. That is why the major statistics are sliced and diced several different ways. Age and ethnicity are frequent subcategories of interest. Today’s unemployment statistics showed the usual story.
The unemployment rate continued to trend upward in February for adult men (8.1 percent), adult women (6.7 percent), whites (7.3 percent), blacks (13.4 percent), and Hispanics (10.9 percent). The jobless rate for teen-agers was little changed at 21.6 percent. The unemployment rate for Asians was 6.9 percent in February, not seasonally adjusted.
Asian unemployment is always the lowest followed by white unemployment. The worst hit by unemployment are black teenage men whose unemployment rates can average about 30% even in the best of economies. Do you know why women always manage to have lower unemployment rates than me? Well, if you checked Heidi Li’s post on the wage gap, you have your answer. Women are employed on the cheap and are much more likely to be kept on during a bad economy than their over paid male counterparts. Older people generally fare better than younger. That is just the last hired, first fired behavior of businesses trying to hold on to their loyal and most experienced employees.



























Recent Comments