It’s the Jobs Stupid!!
Posted: July 15, 2009 Filed under: U.S. Economy | Tags: Consumer Price Index, economic growth, inflation, jobs, US Industrial Production Comments Off on It’s the Jobs Stupid!!
From Brad DeLong: http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/07/bad-news-about-industrial-production-sigh.html
Here’s a trajectory for POTUS to chew on from the recently released statistics on Industrial Production and Capacity. This is a key indicator of an economy’s well being. It’s down again. There’s something about Obama’s use of the words “right trajectory” on Anderson Cooper the other night that makes me think he should ask Harvard to give him a bit of a refund on that ‘education’. How hard is to understand that when production keeps falling that is not a good trend? He’s had to have the inside scope on these numbers for at least a week. Why give Cooper and the world the impression of something else?
Industrial production decreased 0.4 percent in June after having fallen 1.2 percent in May. For the second quarter as a whole, output fell at an annual rate of 11.6 percent, a more moderate contraction than in the first quarter, when output fell 19.1 percent. Manufacturing output moved down 0.6 percent in June, with declines at both durable and nondurable goods producers. Outside of manufacturing, the output of mines fell 0.5 percent in June, and the output of utilities increased 0.8 percent. The rate of capacity utilization for total industry declined in June to 68.0 percent, a level 12.9 percentage points below its average for 1972-2008. Prior to the current recession, the low over the history of this series, which begins in 1967, was 70.9 percent in December 1982.
The graph (which uses seasonally adjusted data) comes from Brad Delong’s “Bad News About Industrial Production”. I would imagine his education taught him the right frame for what is the ‘right trajectory’ and the ‘wrong trajectory’ when discussing macroeconomics with his UC Berkely Students. I know my economics professor Campbell R. McConnell taught me well at the more humble University of Nebraska where I cut my economist baby teeth. Now, I know we’re supposed to be a service economy and that things like manufacturing, transportation and mining aren’t supposed to be relevant to us any more. I still can’t help asking how many young people with nothing more than a devalued high school diploma would rather face a life building cars than mowing the lawns of Goldman Sachs Bankers? Is any one beginning to have similar questions on the mythical hope and change meme of last year? Is it still just you and me? The Sinoperuvian lesbians of hillbilly America?
Today, even the editorial page of the Gray Lady even asked the right questions.
Unemployment is rising. Foreclosures are surging. Lending is still constrained. So why exactly is the Obama administration waiting to act?
Their answer is not so different from mine of the past two days.
If wait-and-see is anything other than a near-term tactic, it’s bound to be a miscalculation. The need for expanded relief and recovery efforts is compelling. Rather than avoid those fights, the Obama team must win them.
The Index of Industrial Production is a key leading indicator of macroeconomic health. It is released monthly by the Fed. “The indicator measures the amount of output from the manufacturing, mining, electric and gas industries. The reference year for the index is 2002 and a level of 100.” It is sitting now at 95.4 (which of course is less than 100) which means it’s lower than it was when the index was set. It measures REAL production output. This means were producing less stuff and of course, that means there are less people necessary to hired to produce less stuff. That’s not good.
Too Much Optimistic = Damned Lies!
Posted: July 14, 2009 Filed under: Surreality, U.S. Economy, Uncategorized | Tags: Christine Romer, Economic Predictions, Jeanne Cummiings, Martin Wolf, Mort Zuckerman, Rosy Scenarios Comments Off on Too Much Optimistic = Damned Lies!
Are we beginning to see the omnipresent reification of the Obama hope/change theme recognized for what it is? All of the memes on superior judgment have been an abstract campaign mantra with no basis in reality. Who but a few among us have recognized this? Are we seeing the first signs of a satori from the all too real realm of the economy and Americans who are losing everything because they have no job? All I can say is it is about damned time and I’m praying that it isn’t too late to get fooled again.
Today’s Pit Boss (Jeanne Cummings) at Politico brings the perspective to inside the beltway where grasping reality has always been a Herculean task. The blog piece is called “Some economists warn Barack Obama’s economic predictions too optimistic.” This economist just calls their prediction lies, lies and more damn lies.
This time, however, the new forecasts — if they are anything like what many outside economists expect — could send a jolt through Capitol Hill, where even the administration’s current debt projections already are prompting deep concerns on political and substantive grounds.
Higher deficit figures also would arrive at a critical moment in the health care debate, as lawmakers are already struggling to find a way to pay for the president’s nearly $1 trillion reform package.
Alternately, if Obama clings to current optimistic forecasts for long-term growth, he risks accusations that he is basing his fiscal plans on fictitious assumptions — precisely the sort of charge he once leveled against the Bush administration.
White House officials rebuff such suggestions, saying the midyear correction is precisely intended to keep their economic program reality based.
But a series of POLITICO interviews in recent days with independent economists of varied political stripes found widespread disdain for Obama’s first round of assumptions, with some experts invoking such phrases as “rosy” and “fantasy.”
Obama’s current forecasts envision 3.2 percent growth next year, 4 percent growth in 2011, 4.6 percent growth in 2012 and 4.2 percent growth in 2013.
Let me continue with the translation of “experts invoking such phrases as “rosy” and “fantasy” and just call them lies, lies, and more damned lies! Clear enough? Following my theme yesterday, I offer what we economists call the stylized facts to offset the varnished untruths wafting through Big Brother’s media screed.
Next Strategy: Declare Victory, Go Home
Posted: July 2, 2009 Filed under: Bailout Blues, Equity Markets, Global Financial Crisis, The Great Recession, U.S. Economy | Tags: Christine Romer, Hilda Solis, job markets, recovery propaganda, unemployment statistics 1 Comment
(kinda graphic video, you’ve been warned)
The economy just won’t drink the koolaid and behave. I wonder if that old Mission Accomplished banner is still lying around the White House basement ? After all, white house economics adviser Christina Romer, via the FT says she’s “upbeat on economy.” So, who do I believe: the Obama administration or my lying economist eyes?
The US economy will feel a substantial boost from the Obama administration’s emergency spending package over the next few months,says Christina Romer, a senior White House official, who has warned against tightening monetary and fiscal policy before recovery is well established.
Ms Romer, chairman of the US president’s council of economic advisers, told the Financial Times in an interview she was “more optimistic” that the economy was close to stabilisation.
But while hopeful that America could yet experience a V-shaped recovery, she said it was much too soon to begin tightening policy: “We do not want to repeat the mistake Japan made in the 1990s, when the moment things started to improve they tightened policy.”
Meanwhile, David Axelrod, a senior White House adviser, told NBC Television yesterday the administration would be open to further stimulus if needed. “Let’s see in the fall where we are, but right now we believe what we have done is adequate to the task. If more is needed, we’ll have that discussion.”
Ms Romer’s comments come as opposition Republicans step up their attacks on the $787bn fiscal stimulus, pointing out that it has not prevented unemployment from hitting a quarter-century high of 9.4 per cent.
Ms Romer said stimulus spending was “going to ramp up strongly through the summer and the fall”.
“We always knew we were not going to get all that much fiscal impact during the first five to six months. The big impact starts to hit from about now onwards,” she said.
Calculated Risk must not see what Christine sees in the numbers. If you still are in the dark as to how exactly bad the employment situation is, go check out their graphs. You can also follow my lying eyes over to the Washington Post where the headline and Neil Irwin’s headline: 467K Jobs Cut in June; Jobless Rate at 26-Year High. Come on guys!!! Drink koolaid or DIE!!!!
Employers kept slashing jobs at a furious pace in June as the unemployment rate edged ever closer to double-digit levels, undermining signs of progress in the economy, and making clear that the job market remains in terrible shape.
…
Wages, meanwhile, were little changed, with average weekly pay for non-managerial workers falling to $609.37, from $609.51. With many people losing their jobs, and those who remain at work making less money, American consumers will be hard-pressed to increase their spending later in the year, despite higher confidence and rising wealth through the stock market.
So, I know the job market always lags the economy, but please Christina, look at the last paragraph. Let’s go to the NY
Times. Here’s their nifty little graphic and here’s some of their reality-based commentary.
The losses for June brought the tally of jobs shed since the beginning of the recession to 6.5 million — a figure equivalent to the net job gains over the previous nine years.
“This is the only recession since the Great Depression to wipe out all jobs growth from the previous business cycle,” Heidi Shierholz, an economist at the labor-oriented Economic Policy Institute in Washington, said in a research note. She called this fact “a devastating benchmark for the workers of this country and a testament to both the enormity of the current crisis and to the extreme weakness of jobs growth from 2000 to 2007.”
Let me just say, that when 70% of the GDP of a country depends on household spending, none of this is good news. But hey, the koolaid club just keeps on spinning right here in the same NY Times article.
“We’re seeing a kind of leveling off here,” Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis said in an interview. “We would have done much worse had we not put the recovery plan in place.”
Early this year, the administration projected that the unemployment rate would peak near 8 percent with the stimulus in place. With joblessness already well above that target, some economists are arguing for another dose of government spending — a call Ms. Solis dismissed as premature. Much of the spending is still in the pipeline and trickling out slowly into the economy, particularly in construction projects that require government permits and planning, she said.
In offering the slow pace of stimulus spending as a partial explanation for higher unemployment, Ms. Solis effectively echoed the criticism that some leveled at the spending package when it was devised: that many of the projects would take too long to have their intended effect.
But Ms. Solis expressed assurances that the program was proceeding according to the administration’s plans.
“We’re making progress,” she said.
What are they on over there? Look at the Calculated Risk Graphs. (Ones that I’ve put up here before but are still being updated in a progressively negative direction.) Those graphs put this downturn into the perspective of all the last downturns since World War 2. Even a petulant clown with fear of numbers can’t miss the trend! This isn’t progress unless you call minusculely less down progress! I’m not seeing any turning points!
The next move has to be for them to declare victory in the rose garden or send us all koolaid with our unemployment checks. Do they really think we are all this dumb?
Digg!!! Tweet!!! Share!!!
Add to: Facebook | Digg | Del.icio.us | Stumbleupon | Reddit | Blinklist | Twitter | Technorati | Furl | Newsvine
An Economic Exercise in Wishful Thinking
Posted: July 1, 2009 Filed under: Global Financial Crisis, Team Obama, The Great Recession, U.S. Economy, Uncategorized Comments Off on An Economic Exercise in Wishful ThinkingIn today’s NY Times, David Leonhardt is very clear about the role of hope and wishful thinking among the Obama economics team. They got the unemployment numbers very, very wrong and as a result, we got a stimulus package that was underdesigned and oversold. If you read me or for that matter, Paul Krugman or Joseph Stiglitz, you were warned about the likely result. While this m.o. among Obama and his minions comes as no surprise to folks here, we’re beginning to see the resulting shock and awe as every one else awakens to policy based on the empty rhetoric of hope and no real change. Precious time, political majorities and capital are being wasted on an enhanced status quo.
In the weeks just before President Obama took office, his economic advisers made a mistake. They got a little carried away with hope.
To make the case for a big stimulus package, they released their economic forecast for the next few years. Without the stimulus, they saw the unemployment rate — then 7.2 percent — rising above 8 percent in 2009 and peaking at 9 percent next year. With the stimulus, the advisers said, unemployment would probably peak at 8 percent late this year.
We now know that this forecast was terribly optimistic. The jobless rate has already reached 9.4 percent. On Thursday, the Labor Department will announce the latest number, for June, and forecasters are expecting it to rise further. In concrete terms, the difference between the situation that the Obama advisers predicted and the one that has come to pass is about 2.5 million jobs. It’s as if every worker in the city of Los Angeles received an unexpected layoff notice.
There are some fundamental things in the labor market that the Obama Team somehow overlooked. The first is the unwinding of the automobile network and all the supporting infrastructure around the supply and sales chain. The second is the impact on the states of low tax revenues and high unemployment insurance payouts. Some how, in focusing on the impact of the financial crisis, they appeared to haven forgotten some basic underlying macroeconomic dynamics. At least, that is my take. They may have kept their eye on the ball, but they failed to look around the bigger field of play.
Leonhardt points to two possible explanations as to why so many very bright people got it so wrong. He argues that because the stimulus package was designed poorly and hurried through with the rosy scenario coloring the numbers, that it is possible that the stimulus package has done nothing and that as a result, things are getting worse. That’s hypothesis number one. His second hypothesis is the more likely one in both his and my opinion. That is that the economy is deteriorating further and this is despite of the stimulus. Again, this would be due to a bad forecast and an even worse policy prescription. So he’s laid out the ground work for the big question while giving a slight nod to some potential for the stimulus plan.
The stimulus package does seem to have helped. But its impact has been minor — so fa
r — compared with the harshness of the Great Recession.
Unfortunately, the administration’s rose-colored forecast has muddied this picture. So if at some point this year or next the White House decides that the economy needs more stimulus, skeptics will surely brandish that old forecast.
Worst of all, the economy really may need more help.
Well, you know, on the one hand, on the other hand. However, whichever hand you choose, this is a policy failure we couldn’t afford.
News for those not Interested in Death and Sex Watches
Posted: June 26, 2009 Filed under: Environmental Protection, Health care reform, president teleprompter jesus, Team Obama, The DNC, The Media SUCKS, U.S. Economy | Tags: Climate change, Froomkin, GLBT rights, Greenpeace, Joe Biden, The American Clean Energy and Security Act, Vice President of Gaffes, Waxman-Markey, White House Watch 3 Commentsor When Will Journalists actually Report Real News?
So for those that don’t want to see the People Magazine section on the front page of every news paper and as the lead in to every TV news item, let’s look at some real news.
Climate Change : The American Clean Energy and Security Act:
Should we be questioning the Climate Change Numbers? Surprise from the WSJ? Not. It’s still an interesting read in light of the Waxman-Markey attempt to push through cap and trade.
The Climate Change Climate Change: The number of skeptics is swelling everywhere.
Among the many reasons President Barack Obama and the Democratic majority are so intent on quickly jamming a cap-and-trade system through Congress is because the global warming tide is again shifting. It turns out Al Gore and the United Nations (with an assist from the media), did a little too vociferous a job smearing anyone who disagreed with them as “deniers.” The backlash has brought the scientific debate roaring back to life in Australia, Europe, Japan and even, if less reported, the U.S.
In April, the Polish Academy of Sciences published a document challenging man-made global warming. In the Czech Republic, where President Vaclav Klaus remains a leading skeptic, today only 11% of the population believes humans play a role. In France, President Nicolas Sarkozy wants to tap Claude Allegre to lead the country’s new ministry of industry and innovation. Twenty years ago Mr. Allegre was among the first to trill about man-made global warming, but the geochemist has since recanted. New Zealand last year elected a new government, which immediately suspended the country’s weeks-old cap-and-trade program.
Greenpeace opposes Waxman-Markey
“Since the Waxman-Markey bill left the Energy and Commerce committee, yet another fleet of industry lobbysists has weakened the bill even more, and further widened the gap between what Waxman-Markey does and what science demands. As a result, Greenpeace opposes this bill in its current form. We are calling upon Congress to vote against this bill unless substantial measures are taken to strengthen it. Despite President Obama’s assurance that he would enact strong, science-based legislation, we are now watching him put his full support behind a bill that chooses politics over science, elevates industry interests over national interest, and shows the significant limitations of what this Congress believes is possible. “As it comes to the floor, the Waxman-Markey bill sets emission reduction targets far lower than science demands, then undermines even those targets with massive offsets. The giveaways and preferences in the bill will actually spur a new generation of nuclear and coal-fired power plants to the detriment of real energy solutions. To support such a bill is to abandon the real leadership that is called for at this pivotal moment in history. We simply no longer have the time for legislation this weak.
I would hate to see this piece of legislation move through the House of Representatives with out media coverage and robust discussion. You’ll remember that I explained cap and trade earlier in case you want a review.














r — compared with the harshness of the Great Recession.



Recent Comments