Talk about surreal. Newt is leading in the polls!

Even Newt thinks it's hysterically funny.

This just can’t be happening, but it is. According to the latest PPP poll,

He’s at 28% to 25% for Herman Cain and 18% for Mitt Romney. The rest of the Republican field is increasingly looking like a bunch of also rans: Rick Perry is at 6%, Michele Bachmann and Ron Paul at 5%, Jon Huntsman at 3%, and Gary Johnson and Rick Santorum each at 1%.

Compared to a month ago Gingrich is up 13 points, while Cain has dropped by 5 points and Romney has gone down by 4.

And for those who think Mitt Romney will still win the nomination, Mr. Flip-Flopper’s approval rating is “at a 6 month low…with only 48% of voters seeing him favorably to 39% with a negative opinion.

In the CNN poll, Newt and Mitt are basically tied, and Cain has dropped down by 11 points since October.

According to a CNN/ORC International Poll released Monday, 24% of Republicans and independents who lean towards the GOP say Romney is their most likely choice for their party’s presidential nominee with Gingrich at 22%. Romney’s two-point advantage is well within the survey’s sampling error. Full results (pdf)

While the level of support has pretty much stayed the same for Romney, the former Massachusetts governor who’s making his second bid for the White House, Gingrich has seen his support jump 14 points since October.

The poll also indicates that 14 percent back Cain, down 11 points from last month.

My head is spinning. Can you imagine Newt Gingrich as President?


Oh, How the Mighty Have Fallen!

Remember back in 2008 when the Obama campaign accused Bill Clinton of making racist comments? Remember when all the prog bloggers wrote that Obama didn’t want Bill Clinton hanging around the White House giving unwanted advice? My, how things have changed!

According to Joe Conason, Obama’s “campaign chiefs” secretly sneaked into Harlem last Wednesday to ask for the former President’s advice on how to get Obama re-elected.

President Obama’s top political operatives — including campaign chief adviser David Axelrod — traveled from Chicago and Washington to the headquarters of the William Jefferson Clinton foundation in Harlem last Wednesday afternoon for a meeting with the former president and two of his top aides. The topic? How to re-elect the current president — including some very specific advice from Clinton, according to sources present.

The Nov. 9 meeting, which went on for more than two hours, also included Clinton counselor Douglas Band and Justin Cooper, a senior adviser whose multiple responsibilities have included work on the former president’s memoir and last two books. Their guests were former White House Deputy Chief of Staff Jim Messina, who is serving as Obama’s 2012 campaign manager; Patrick Gaspard, executive director of the Democratic National Committee who until recently oversaw political affairs in the White House; and Obama’s lead pollster Joel Benenson, who played the same role in the 2008 campaign.

According to Conason, the meeting was requested by Obama advisers. Much of the discussion centered on how to win in southern and southwestern battleground states “such as North Carolina, Virginia, Nevada, and Arizona” that Obama won last time, but is now struggling.

Economic conditions and how to address them dominated the discussion. What most interested the Obama team were Clinton’s insights on heartland voting blocs that remain in the political middle: not the Republican-leaning independents who always end up voting for the GOP nominee, but the truly uncommitted who largely ended up supporting Obama in 2008.

Apparently Bill was told in no uncertain terms that his help is very much needed and wanted during the upcoming campaign.

Meanwhile, at the Financial Times, Edward Luce is echoing James Carville’s recent advice to Obama: Mr President, it’s time to panic. In discussing the failure and recent demotion of Obama’s latest chief of staff Bill Daley, Luce argues that Obama hasn’t learned the lesson that his campaign staff are not the best advisers on governing and policy.

On his way out, Rahm Emanuel warned Mr Daley that he would be just one among four de facto chiefs of staff, each with independent access to Mr Obama. That has proved accurate. Effective presidents rely on powerful managers, who are not obliged to compete with election consultants for the president’s ear. At a time when there is “low visibility” in the US economy, and when volatility holds the whip hand over American politics, there is greater need than ever for a leader who can focus on the bigger horizon.

It has been almost three years, and frustrated allies say that Mr Obama shows few signs of finding a learning curve. He still fails to consult widely and dislikes “reaching out” when he has to. Many Democrats have given up trying. “He doesn’t want to listen,” said one senator. “I don’t think the leopard is going to change his spots.” The plain fact is that Mr Obama prefers to campaign than govern. With the entrenched inner circle that he has, no one should be surprised by this. Whether or not Mr Obama can eke out a victory next year, it would be optimistic to expect things to change radically in a second term.

Will Obama be able to learn from Bill Clinton’s advice? My guess is the focus will be on taking advantage of Clinton’s skills as a campaigner rather than listening to the wisdom he gained during eight years in the White House and as a world leader.\


Gloria Cain Says Her Husband “Totally Respects Women.”

Gloria and Herman Cain

Fox News has released a couple of teaser quotes from Gloria Cain’s interview with Greta van Susteren, scheduled to air tomorrow night. The couple both participated, unfortunately. I was hoping the appearance would be sans Herman. Asked about the accusations of sexual harassment against her husband, Mrs. Cain said the following:

“…you hear the graphic allegations and we know that would have been something that’s totally disrespectful of her as a woman. And I know the type of person he is. He totally respects women.”

Right. I guess that’s why he joked about Anita Hill and called Nancy Pelosi “Princess Nancy.” And his respect for women is probably why Cain allowed a group of his supporters to refer to one of his accusers as an “ugly bitch.”

At another point she added, “I’m thinking he would have to have a split personality to do the things that were said.”

Hmmmm…maybe he has dissociative identity disorder (multiple personalities). That would explain why he didn’t remember any of the incidents of harassment or the fact that two women were compensated with $35,000 and $45,000 respectively.

A former spokesperson for Cain, Ellen Carmichael,

said on Twitter that the interview marks “the first time I’ve heard Gloria Cain, even after working for Herman for more than a year.”

The WaPo has a little more.

Cain’s wife, who is said by friends to be a quiet woman, and who is a registered Democrat according to her husband, has steered clear of the spotlight and has not assumed the traditional role of candidate’s wife. Cain has said that his wife has been outraged by the claims against her husband. When Gloria Cain watched accuser Sharon Bialek’s news conference last Monday, she told her husband that the man that Bialek described sounded nothing like the man she’s known for 45 years.

“The things that that woman described, she said, that doesn’t even sound like you, and I’ve known you for 45 years,” Cain recalled his wife saying to him after she watched the press conference from Atlanta. “My own wife said that I wouldn’t do anything as silly as what that lady was talking about.”

That lady? It’s hard to believe that Cain is a baby boomer. He missed out on the consciousness raising part of the ’60s and’70s, that’s for sure.


Live Blog: *Another* Republican Debate?! Haven’t We Suffered Enough Already?

Who will crash and burn tonight? Will Perry have another brain freeze episode? Will Romney avoid flip-flopping? What embarrassing, tasteless remark will Cain make about women? What ghastly, nighmarish thing will Santorum say about gay marriage? Will god finally make an appearance and choose which of these nutcases is really the divine choice for president?

Tonight’s debate is sponsored by CBS and the National Journal and will take place in Spartanburg, South Carolina. The topics will be national security and foreign policy. You can watch it beginning at 8PM on CBS TV or at the CBS website.

CBS has more tips about what to watch for. First on the list, of course, is whether Rick Perry “can clear the low bar of expectations.”

Almost every debate has been a challenge for the Texas governor, but after Wednesday night’s face plant in Michigan, there’s really nowhere for him to go but up. He’s tried to make light of he stumbles and turn them into strengths, saying he’s not slick, that he speaks from the heart. That’s all well and good, but the danger for Perry is that voters already have formed an opinion of him–and that based on his past performances, they lack confidence that he is either capable or can persuasively carry the conservative message to victory. Debates matter to voters: In our new poll, 76 percent of Republicans said the candidate’s performance was important in deciding their vote.

You don’t have to be a championship debater–the pundits and the media never gave the debate points George W. Bush. But Bush clearly passed the threshold that he was qualified to be president. In debates, he was able to connect with voters and communicate his message in a way Perry so far has not.

I really do hope that god shows up and tells Rick to go back to Texas and deal with drought and wildfires.

I plan to watch as long as I can stand it. I’m hoping for another horrible goof by one or more candidates. If you’re watching too, please join me in the comments.


Here We Go Again: the Political Prop Wife

I was hoping that maybe this scandal would be different.  When Anthony Wiener was caught in a series of mutually stupid sexting scandals,  wife Huma  Abedin stayed away from the role of adoring political prop wife.  She let him handle the reporters and the public on his own.  I admire Mark Sanford’s wife who has completely turned the stereotype of political prop wife on its head.   After these kinds of public humiliations, the least you should be able to hang on to is your dignity and self respect.  That’s far more important than staying in a marriage with a Lothario.

The worst and most shameful abuse of a wife of a politician had to be by David Vitter who got caught with his diapers down on a prostitute’s call list.

Looks like one more manipulative political husband just can’t resist trotting out his probably long suffering wife just one more time.  Herman Cain may be getting some big donations from men in denial of their treatment of women, but his numbers with women voters–who know that men frequently overstep their boundaries–have dropped like an avalanche.  So, he’s going to do the knee jerk damage control thing and  trot out political man’s best friend, his prop wife.  After enduring the Vitter presser, I’ve decided this is nothing less than domestic abuse.  I still remember Eliot Spitzer’s wife blaming herself for his problem with call girls.  What campaign manager thinks the public humiliation of a wife is good politics?

Introducing … Gloria Etchison Cain.

At long last, the political spouse who has kept the lowest profile of the campaign season is preparing to make a network debut. Mrs. Cain, who has been married to the former restaurant executive Herman Cain for 43 years, is expected to sit down this weekend with Greta Van Susteren of Fox News, for a segment that could air on Monday, according to a source familiar with the planning.

Mrs. Cain has, to date, not appeared on the campaign trail with her husband, and is said to prefer her home life in Atlanta, far away from the national spotlight. But since allegations of sexual harassment began to engulf the Cain campaign almost two weeks ago, it had been rumored that Mrs. Cain would eventually come to her husband’s defense on television.

Mr. Cain has been talking about his wife and family more of late, perhaps to offer a counterpoint to the multiple women who have come forward to accuse him of inappropriate behavior while he was chief of the National Restaurant Association in the 1990s.

While in New York City on Friday for a major fund-raising drive, Mr. Cain stopped at Fox News and was asked about his wife by the host Neil Cavuto. “What’s she saying to you?” he questioned.

Mr. Cain replied, “She’s saying to me that the family has your back. We’re not going to let them, you know, continue to … We are there.”

Worst example to date of making your humiliated wife act as your prop for the purposes of shoring up your hypocritical ass comes from selfish David Vitter.

Gotta admire the former Mrs. Stanford for leaving her bum of a husband and getting on with her life.  She seems to be one of the few wronged political wives that didn’t accept her role as prop and pulled herself away from a man that obviously didn’t have her or her family’s best interests at heart.  I can only imagine what  Gloria Cain will be put through to prop up her husband’s stalled ambitions.