Just Cast my Puma Vote!
Posted: November 4, 2008 Filed under: John McCain, New Orleans, No Obama, PUMA | Tags: Exit Polls, Helena Morena, Mary Landrieu, New Orleans, presidential election, Puma Vote 5 CommentsThose of you that know me, know I live in the ninth ward in New Orleans. I live in the inner city and we have the usual inner city problems including gang violence, a lot of drug-related crimes, and not enough money to rebuild our infrastructure and schools just for regular wear and tear. Let’s not even go into the Hurricane Katrina wear and tear. My neighborhood is close to the river, so when the city filled up, we stayed high and dry. However, they still haven’t rebuilt our police station. We also don’t have banks or grocery stores any more. That’s the upper ninth. The lower ninth has less, if that’s possible.
I vote in the local fire house. It was built in the 1920s and the old stables that used to house the horses that pulled the street car named desire and the fire carriages stand silently next to it. There are two precincts that vote in this building. I see the same little southern church ladies each time I vote. The know me because I vote in every election–even the odd ones with just a charter change or replacement for the latest politician caught up and drug off to jail. That’s the thing that makes me most sad about where I live at the moment.
My state senator just resigned for laundering money. Two school board members and a popular city councilman at large are sitting in jail for bribery. The entire country knows about Congressman Dollar Bill Jefferson. He looks like he’ll be re-elected pretty much along straight racial lines. Black folk seem to be mighty forgiving down here. It seems they’ll take any black face over a Hispanic, white or other face no matter what the circumstances. The mistrust of white hegemony makes me feel like the Jim Crow Laws disappeared just yesterday. Black politicians get a wide berth. I’ve learned that lesson over and over down here. In fact, our Mayor Ray Nagin lives more in Dallas than he does here. He comes in late on Monday and is out of here by Thursday night. That says something about the living conditions in your city when your own mayor won’t live in it full time. I have to say that I voted for him the first time, but I didn’t make that mistake again. We call him Mayor Na-GONE for a very good reason. I also think that he’ll eventually run for the Jefferson seat once the federal court finally throws the book at Ol’ Dollar bill. My guess is he’ll be just as worthless of a congressman as he was as a mayor until they wind up having to redraw the state of Louisiana to eliminate one congressional district. Then it might be another ball game.
Until then, we’ll suffer because very few of our leaders actually care about the city or the state it is in. They care about their political career and ability to live large. We’ll also suffer because a lot of the electorate thinks the only qualification one needs here to be effective is the right demographic. It has got me questioning the nature of racism these days. I think it’s all about who is in power and abusing that power for the benefit of ‘your own’. I now see that folks that once suffered from this can inflict it without much thought.
It makes voting disheartening when you’re actually interested in good government. I get tired of watching one person after another get hauled off to jail. I guess ex-Governor Edwards is getting a lot of new company. There’s plenty of folks from the various Louisiana political machines still running for office as well as sitting in jails right now. If you’ve never lived in a realm of political machines, there is no way you know what that does to the folks on the outs. It’s thuggery plain and simple.
Thuggery, abusing racial identities, and machines brings me to the topic of voting in the National Election for obvious reasons. I wore my orange sweater to show my unity with Pumas voting all over our country. I was really surprised that I didn’t have to wait in line. There were only two suprises awaiting me. The first one was this: after voting election after election, the church ladies had this conversation before I entered the booth. The one whose job it always is to clear out the previous vote, turned to the others and asked: “Should I ask her the question?’ Since voting here has become extremely routine, this gave me a bit of a jolt. The ladies nodded and I was asked “Democrat or Republican”? Since there are not two seperate ballots for this election, I found this a very odd question but smiled and said “Democrat”. I secretly smiled and thought, if you’re asking me if i voted Democrat at the top of the ticket, the answer would’ve been no. I guess folks are still thinking we will vote along party lines.
The next thing that happened when I walked out of the fire station was also unique for me. I was asked to fill out an exit poll form for the news agencies. I never vote really early in the morning as a rule but I was trying to avoid lines so I got out the door the minute I’d walked the dog. It was a simple one sheet form with the logos of nearly all the news affiliates across the top. I was asked the usual demographic questions, age, sex, religion, income level, party affiliation, and education level. I was also asked which issues most concerned me ( I said energy policy) and when I made my decision to vote (within the last three days). I was asked to rank what I thought of the George Bush presidency. (Disaster wasn’t available so I had to settle for saying I was extremely dissatisfied). I said I was very worried about the future of the economy–another situation I had to rank. There were also the candidate listing of President, Senator, and House Rep. I put McCain, Landrieu, and Moreno. So when they are slicing and dicing the last minute voters … and they find the democrats for McCain in the exit polls, you will find me in that number. I hope you find me representin’ in the ninth ward for a lot of you out there.
Politics Make for Strange Bedfellows
Posted: November 1, 2008 Filed under: Action Memo, Hillary Clinton: Her Campaign for All of Us, No Obama, PUMA | Tags: No Obama, Now is the time to PROTEST VOTE, PUMA 1 Comment
I’ve been watching some of the links showing up here at my blog and also at The Confluence. Something really STRANGE is going on. The Republicans are abuzz with praises for Pumas. I’m reading blog after blog on the right saying that PUMAS may very well save the country. Check out these links. It will make you a believer in the old saying that politics make strange bedfellows.
From Redstate: More on Why McCain should Win: The Puma Factor
From McCain Democrat Clinton Republican: People Want to know about Puma
From Death by a 1000 papercuts: Pumas the Democrats the Media Doesn’t Want to Talk About
To be real honest, I’ve had a feeling that folks have been reading many of our sites for some time. This includes the media. I also know that some of the things that have been discussed here on The Confluence and on other Puma sites have shown up a few days after the topic was completely dissected by the PUMA community. Several times we’ve been accused of passing right wing memes when I swear the points were discussed here prior to being tossed around on right wing blogs and even right wing radio shows.
Several stories broken here (including SimoFish’s posting of the Hillary Fundraiser where Hillary says she thinks that putting her name up for a roll call vote would help her supporters gain closure) and on No Quarter. ( Think ACORN and most of the ACORN threads including the Obama expenditure on “lights, etc” which turned out to be voter-registration related .) These were first discoverd in the PUMA world.
You may feel discouraged and think that we’re not making a difference, but you really shouldn’t. This should tell you that our voices are being heard and that our cause has been well-argued. Now is the time for us to finally decide where to put our final action: OUR VOTE. As for me, I’ve gone into a voting pack with SM77 who lives in the swing state of Florida. I will be voting for Cynthia McKinney for her, here in New Orleans, LA. Louisiana is a red state. She will be casting my vote for John McCain in Florida.
Please, PUMAs, stick to your guns and cast your vote in accordance with our principles. It is up to us to show the DNC that denying one-man one vote to TWO states, stacking primaries so that small states out count large swing sates, and allowing rampant caucus frauds are not behaviors we wish the democratic party to undertake. Let them know that we don’t appreciate them putting a candidate with no accomplishments and a race-baiting, misogynistic campaign to the front of the line. Vote your conscious! Vote like a PUMA! Even the Republicans know that we can make a difference!
Una Voz Dulce
Posted: October 28, 2008 Filed under: No Obama | Tags: No Obama 7 CommentsI picked this off Jack Tapper’s blog because I found this woman’s voice to be authentic and touching. Just thought I’d share it with you.
The United States of America is a symbol of freedom and liberty throughout the world, and if the President of the United States meets with dictators such as Chavez without any preconditions, then that kills any HOPE that I have that it is going to be different here in Latin America. That one day we will be able to live in a democracy that works and where we are free to express our opinions about our leaders and our leaders without punishment or reprimand.
Since I have no say, I beg the people of the United States not to vote for Barack Obama. He will make that great country of yours, that country that represents hope and freedom throughout the world, the greatest country in the world, he would make it weak and equal to countries such as Iran, Venezuela and North Korea. Please do not kill the only hope that I have in my country’s struggling democracy. Hugo Chavez is spending millions of dollars trying to cause a civil war here in Central America, and for our countries to go to the left and become communist. I beg you, do not let Hugo Chavez win this fight. Let democracy and liberty prevail.
Thank you very much for your time…
Alexander Cockburn: Obama, the first-rate Republican
Posted: October 26, 2008 Filed under: No Obama | Tags: Alexander Cockburn, No Obama, Obama as first rate republican, Obama No experience, Obama NOT progressive, Obama Opportunist, Obama Propganad 16 CommentsIs there anything the front-runner will not say to become President? No progressive cause would have a chance with him in charge
Sunday, 26 October 2008
Obama invokes change. Yet never has the dead hand of the past had a “reform” candidate so firmly by the windpipe. Is it possible to confront America’s problems without talking about the arms budget? The Pentagon is spending more than at any point since the end of the Second World War. In “real dollars” – an optimistic concept these days – the $635bn (£400bn) appropriated in fiscal 2007 is 5 per cent above the previous all-time high, reached in 1952. Obama wants to enlarge the armed services by 90,000. He pledges to escalate the US war in Afghanistan; to attack Pakistan’s territory if it obstructs any unilateral US mission to kill Osama bin Laden; and to wage a war against terror in a hundred countries, creating a new international intelligence and law enforcement “infrastructure” to take down terrorist networks. A fresh start? Where does this differ from Bush’s commitment on 20 September 2001, to an ongoing “war on terror” against “every terrorist group of global reach” and “any nation that continues to harbour or support terrorism”?
Obama’s liberal defenders comfort themselves with the thought that “he had to say that to get elected”. He didn’t. After eight years of Bush, Americans are receptive to reassessing America’s imperial role. Obama has shunned this opportunity. If elected, he will be a prisoner of his promise that on his watch Afghanistan will not be lost, nor the white man’s burden shirked.
Whatever drawdown of troops in Iraq that does take place in the event of Obama’s victory will be a brief hiccup amid the blare and thunder of fresh “resolve”. In the event of Obama’s victory, the most immediate consequence overseas will most likely be brusque imperial reassertion. Already, Joe Biden, the shopworn poster boy for Israeli intransigence and Cold War hysteria, is yelping stridently about the new administration’s “mettle” being tested in the first six months by the Russians and their surrogates. Obama is far more hawkish than McCain on Iran.
After eight years of unrelenting assault on constitutional liberties by Bush and Cheney, public and judicial enthusiasm for tyranny has waned. Obama has preferred to stand with Bush and Cheney. In February, seeking a liberal profile in the primaries, Obama stood against warrantless wiretapping. His support for liberty did not survive for long. Five months later, he voted in favour and declared that “the ability to monitor and track individuals who want to attack the United States is a vital counter-terrorism tool”.
Every politician, good or bad, is an ambitious opportunist. But beneath this topsoil, the ones who make a constructive dent on history have some bedrock of fidelity to some central idea. In Obama’s case, this “idea” is the ultimate distillation of identity politics: the idea of his blackness. Those who claim that if he were white he would be cantering effortlessly into the White House do not understand that without his most salient physical characteristic Obama would be seen as a second-tier senator with unimpressive credentials.
As a political organiser of his own advancement, Obama is a wonder. But I have yet to identify a single uplifting intention to which he has remained constant if it has presented any risk to his progress. We could say that he has not yet had occasion to adjust his relatively decent stances on immigration and labour-law reform. And what of public funding of his campaign? Another commitment made becomes a commitment betrayed. His campaign treasury is a vast hogswallow that, if it had been amassed by a Republican, would be the topic of thunderous liberal complaint.
Obama’s run has been the negation of almost every decent progressive principle, with scarcely a bleat of protest from the progressives seeking to hold him to account. The Michael Moores stay silent. Obama has crooked the knee to bankers and Wall Street, to the oil companies, the coal companies, the nuclear lobby, the big agricultural combines. He is more popular with Pentagon contractors than McCain, and has been the most popular of the candidates with Washington lobbyists. He has been fearless in offending progressives, constant in appeasing the powerful.
So no, this is not an exciting or liberating moment in America’s politics. If you want a memento of what could be exciting, go to the website of the Nader-Gonzalez campaign and read its platform on popular participation and initiative. Or read the portions of Libertarian Party candidate Bob Barr’s platform on foreign policy and constitutional rights. The standard these days for what the left finds tolerable is awfully low. The more the left holds its tongue, the lower the standard will go.
Alexander Cockburn co-edits counterpunch.org, the US left-wing website, and is a columnist for ‘The Nation’ and ‘The First Post’ (alexandercockburn@asis.com)
The Last Journalist Standing May Well be Tavis Smiley
Posted: October 24, 2008 Filed under: Main Stream Media, No Obama | Tags: Last Real Journalist, Obama and the Media, Tavis Smiley Comments Off on The Last Journalist Standing May Well be Tavis SmileyI’ve written in my blog about the difficulties many African Americans have had for not supporting Obama or seemingly not supporting him enough. Many black supporters of Hillary were subjected to some fairly outrageous charges during the primary and some were bullied into changing their candidate choice.
One of the folks that I mentioned in an earlier thread was Tavis Smiley. Tavis is a journalist and is
responsible for the conference entitled “The State of the Black Union” which has been held in New Orleans recently. My last blog post supporting him was due to his questioning of Barack Obama’s commitment to black American by not showing up for the conference but offering to send Michelle Obama instead. Senator Clinton was the sole candidate to show up personally at this event. Tavis said thanks but no thanks to the offer of Michelle and was roundly criticized.
An interview by Jon Friedman with Smiley showed up in Market Watch. I read his comments and more on the flak he’s been taking for trying to be objective. Objectivity is something journalists are supposed to be all about. At least I got that impression from my 3 high school journalism classes. Maybe if I’d have continued through college I would have found this to be old-fashioned.
Smiley said that to the consternation of a number of Obama supporters, he hasn’t given the Democrat a free pass during the campaign. Smiley said he has acted like an objective, probing journalist. It makes no difference to an ethical journalist — whether he works in a news room or hosts a talk show — what a candidate’s skin color is or whether or not Smiley privately supports that person’s prospects.Smiley said he had heard from some African-American viewers that “‘Tavis is a hater… a traitor…a sell-out.'”In July, Huffington Post noted: “For months (Smiley) has been the object of an Internet firestorm for his perceived negative comments about Obama…” See Huffington Post column.
“The issues I raised were affirmative action, campaign finance reform, gun control, the death penalty and wiretapping.”He said he recognized that Obama would likely be reluctant to deal with controversial topics “when everything is going his way.”







Recent Comments