PUMA forward

puma-paw2You think it’s too late to plan some kind of commemorative/commiserative event for the 5.31 rules committee meeting that led to the birth of PUMA? Maybe make it net/blog based? Any interest?

Digg!!!! Share!!!!

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine


The “Incompetence Crisis”

rassie-pollAll last year,  ALL  I heard was how experience didn’t matter.  I heard that being ‘ready on day one’  was a meaningless campaign slogan.  I was told that what mattered was perceived good judgment, intelligence, and speaking skills.  I remember watching the first Democratic Debates and thinking, this guy isn’t ready to be dogcatcher, let alone President. There were no wonky answers on economics or foreign policy.  There was never a show of any detailed plan.  There was always just a nice speech read from a teleprompter with a preacher’s patois, incredible (somewhat contradictory) promises, and messages that could have come from a motivational seminar instead of a political campaign.  I never got on the bandwagon.

I finally found a home over here in the Pumasphere with people of similar thought after being treated like a scourge by other sites (blog or MSM) that had gone over to the hope side.  I’ve been getting used to my role as pariah. I was thinking I’d have to live with it for at least a year.  I figured I’d start getting the you were so right calls sometime in the fall.

Boy, was I wrong!

I figured that because of my experience during the early calls for the Iraq war.  I was the one saying “Iraq has nothing to do with 9/11.  Iraq is a different agenda.  Iraq is a bad idea.”   I actually had some one get up in a restaurant to tell me what a lousy, unpatriotic American I was that didn’t deserve to live in the US. I became a the scourge of all true American patriots.  I’ve been thinking that my 9/11 protest was just a character building experience that would serve me well during the Obama fascination period and that it would probably take a few years of, yet again, being a scourge to all true American patriots before the worm would turn.  Luckily, I found a other like minded out in the Pumasphere so I don’t have to be quite alone as I was with my opinion on the Iraq Invasion.

I think I can honestly speak for a number of us around here.  We didn’t expect to be proven so right so quickly.  At least I didn’t. I was hoping that maybe it wouldn’t be as bad as my gut and head had deduced.  So many of my friends said, he’s not Dubya, so he’s got to be better, you’ll see.   After all, we’d get rid of a lot of really evil signing statements that restrict women’s reproductive choices, the right of all people to love and marry whom they wish, and we’d move ahead on science again.  I’ve said this before, but nearly any democrat would have done any of those things–including Joe Lieberman. Lieberman is one of those folks that I consider marginally a democrat, but even he would have done those things if he were POTUS.  We certainly wouldn’t see any nasty supreme court appointments either.  These were marginal hopes and small changes that I could cling to while knowing that eventually, I would be proven right.  I just didn’t even imagine it would wind up quite like this, quite so fast.

So, if I haven’t made myself clear here, Rush Limbaugh and Governor Jindal may be cheering for a failure.  I’m not in that camp at all.  I’ve just been quietly sitting here telling myself that with all the beautiful things written into the constitution as well as the resiliency of the American people, that perhaps it won’t be quite as bad as I thought it would be.   After all, we survived the incompetency of George Bush and the lunacy of Dick Cheney. Things can’t fall apart that fast!

Boy, was I wrong!

Pumas are the new Cassandras.  Our warnings, unheeded, demonized, and marginalized, are now the stuff of MSM op ed pieces.  I’d like to point you to a few that are searing Obama with legitimate criticisms.   I would think they came from one of the edgier Puma sites but they don’t.  One is from CNN. The other from the UK’s Prospect.  I also have two from the NY Times.  These comments are simply alarming.

Read the rest of this entry »


We’re not in Kansas any more, Dorothy

glindaI’m not sure what made me go read No Quarter first thing this morning. It really isnt’ one of my usual morning haunts but I went there.  I was greeted by and fully linked to this article by Scott Horton at Harper’s Magazine.  This is one of my favorite magazines although I’ve lost touch with it since Katrina.   (Getting fourth class mail delivered here is still an iffy thing.)   Of course, SusanUnPC has been all aglow for Hillary as SOS, as have most of us Hillary fans. I’m not trying to ignite any blog wars here because I really don’t take issue with her at all or actually the posting of the article.  It is what it is: a nice thread on the difference between Hillary and Condi as SOS and what that will mean to the employees of the State Department.  But, it’s the framing of that situation that caught me in my pre-coffee, pre-first class condition. So, here was the eye-catching quote.

“There are great hopes for Hillary at State. I met last week with a number of career State Department employees and was surprised when one said she was looking forward to the “Glinda Party” next week. I asked her: if Hillary was Glinda, the Good Witch of the South from the Wizard of Oz, did that make Condoleezza Rice the Wicked Witch of the West?”

Now, I’m not one to be an apologist for ANY Bush policy, let alone the appalling lack of professional diplomacy, but are we so swimming in the patriarchy that we have to frame two of the most powerful women in the world as the good witch and the bad witch?  Just askin if something smells a little fishy to you …


Whither Hillary?

I’m always overly pensive at the end of the semester. The weather even obliged.  It was just cloudy and chilly enough to keep me inside at my desk.  I finished my last lecture today and was hard-pressed to find good news for my students other than it would all be over shortly.  There’s a certain melancholy that comes with all endings.  It leaves a me with a sense of wistful calm.

In case you haven’t been watching the economy, it’s not good.  The labor statistics that came out today were beyond grim.  Even President Bush has decided that something has to be done about the auto companies if just to stymie job loss for the time being.  Speaker-of the-House Pelosi is even open now to using the green incentives money set aside for the Detroit three ( no longer worthy of being framed the BIG three anymore) to go after fuel efficient cars with less impact on the environment.  This entire day seemed to be wrapped up in one big moment of quiet resolution. 

I poured some wine and decided tonight’s newscast for the day would be News Hour with Jim Lerher.  The end of the broadcast was a conversation that was billed this way:

Brooks and Marcus
Analysts David Brooks and Ruth Marcus weigh in on the news of the week, including the return of auto executives to Capitol Hill.

The conversation did include the inevitability of something for the auto executives as well as this week’s discussion of Team Obama and the future of his ‘rivals’.  Ruth Marcus took some time to discuss Hillary’s acceptance of SOS and was generally complimentary.  Her only question was that of potential Big Dawg drama.  Then, magically, some analysis caught me by surprise.  She asked if any one had noticed how generally sad Hillary had looked on Monday while accepting SOS besides her?  I think both Jim Lerher and David Brooks were also surprised by the comment, but after some reflection agreed.  Yes she did look a little wistful with a hint of quiet resolution.  Ruth said that she decided to follow-up later with a ‘close friend’ of Hillary about the observation.  (Yes, that well known journalistic  teaser yet again, she had an ‘unnamed’ source.)  Ruth said the friend was well acquainted with the tinge of melancholia and that it was the result of Hillary knowing “her political career is over”.  

USA-OBAMA/CLINTONThat bit of self-reflection hit me on a real basic level.  It sounded quite believable, but I was glad when David Brooks cracked a joke about the Clintons always managing to come back when you least expect them.   But know I’m thinking again and I’m still coming back to this gut feeling that she probably has got that right but I’m still not sure why I feel that way, let alone, why she might feel that way.

I have to say, I’m feeling a little blue about the idea of not seeing Hillary on a campaign trail again.   Maybe it’s just the time of year, or the weather, or this glass of red wine.  Maybe you can convince me that one shouldn’t trust what’s been said by a reporter’s unnamed source at the end of a semester.


Howls from the The Progressive Wilderness

bailoutI continue to be amazed by the number of progressive bloggers that are rationalizing their votes for Obama while experiencing one jaw-dropping Obama appointment after another.  Today, I read David Sirota’s addendum to the latest progressive hissy-fit.  That is, it must be we haven’t had enough hissy-fits because the one is obviously not listening to us.  Read it all here.

Did Obama really run on a progressive agenda?  If you’ve read any of us Cassandras on The Confluence or other Puma places, you’ll see that we’ve been saying he’s not a progressive for a long time.  My favorite description of the one is opportunistic chameleon.  Let’s face it progressives, ever since you were had on FISA, the one realized it wasn’t his platform but his hopey changey say nothing of substance speeches that would get him elected.  Why would you think that would change now? 

 

Read the rest of this entry »