It’s Mardi Gras: You know, the Party before Penitence?
Posted: February 24, 2009 Filed under: Equity Markets, Global Financial Crisis, New Orleans, No Obama, president teleprompter jesus, Team Obama, U.S. Economy | Tags: bad banks, bailouts, fat tuesday, mardi gras, treasury department, zombie banks Comments Off on It’s Mardi Gras: You know, the Party before Penitence?
I’m sitting here watching the kids get their costumes together for the big day of celebration called Fat Tuesday. That’s the day when you pull out all the stops because you know lean days (no meat, no alcohol, no fun) starts tomorrow. I guess I must be in hyper-metaphorical mode because it’s really striking me this year as a good fable. Tonight at midnight, the Krewe of Klean will take to the streets of the French Quarter to shovel all the leftovers into the dump trucks. The police will ride their horses down Bourbon street and announce that the Party’s over. They arrest anyone who want the party to continue at that point. You can either spend Ash Wednesday doing penitence in your bed or the Parish Prison.
When I first got out of graduate school I went to work at a small bank. I was soon lured to the biggest Savings and Loan in the middle of the country. I’d been working on loan pricing models and arranging bank income statements into an exercise called spread management and asset-liability matching. Big time company working for a big time CEO!
I have to admit, the only person that I really knew that was a CEO was my dad and he was great. His employees loved him. He gave them wonderful benefits and when they had sick children or they were gravely ill, he gave them time off with pay. His office manager was openly gay. His mechanics and body technicians were a diverse group for small town Iowa. Most of them worked for my dad the entire 30 years and loved him as much as I did. From the time he bought it when I was one, until he retired when I was in my 30s, the entire employee base was my extended family. So, I entered the business world thinking this was the model for management and boy, was I wrong.
Moral Hazard and Corporate Governance
Posted: February 18, 2009 Filed under: Equity Markets, Global Financial Crisis, president teleprompter jesus, U.S. Economy, Uncategorized, Voter Ignorance 1 CommentI usually stick with the Economics side of my degree instead of the Finance when I blog because macroeconomics is highly linked to politics and policy. Today, I’m going to switch over to the one field specialty I took in graduate school that’s not considered economics. (My economics fields are monetary and international.) My finance field is corporate finance. The two theories I spend time researching in the corporate area are two that are frequently at the middle of financial crisis.
Moral Hazard is a problem in situations where there are multiple parties, differing levels of information about the situation, and differing levels of exposure to the risk inherent in the situation. Evaluating how folks operate in different risky situations with varying amounts of information using mathematical models is basically a big old exercise in calculus that I’m not going to do here. The theory is a useful one that explains,as an example, why you drive faster if you’ve got a seatbelt on and are insured. Basically, between seatbelts and insurance, you don’t feel as ‘at risk’ so you behave in a riskier way.
Corporate Governance Laws and Executive Compensation packages are designed to overcome the moral hazard implicit in one of the most basic moral hazard models. It’s called the principal-agent problem. Basically this theory shows the problems that can occur when the owner(s) of a firm (the principal) hire managers (the agent) to run the firm. The owners (like common stock shareholders) don’t have the same level of information about firm performance that the executives do. They have to rely on the executives for information. Also, the owners can loose lots of money if the executives make bad decisions and slack off and don’t work as hard as they should. In this model, the principals have to find a contract that will force the agents to act in their interests. They must force them to work hard and return the maximum wealth to the shareholders. That’s what corporate governance laws and executive compensation packages are designed to do: align the interests of the executives and the shareholders. If designed properly, they should eliminate the moral hazard problem. Corporate Governance creates a more transparent environment where the executives can’t hide information. Property designed executive compensation packages reward the executives for doing their best by shareholders.
Where’s the Reform?
Posted: February 17, 2009 Filed under: Equity Markets, Global Financial Crisis, president teleprompter jesus, Team Obama, The Media SUCKS, U.S. Economy, Uncategorized | Tags: Credit Derivatives, FED, financial market reform, Mary Dizzard, SEC, Securities Market Comments Off on Where’s the Reform?
We keep hearing about the global financial collapse and how several things played into its creation. Since the credit markets are mostly dried up, loose credit to purchase overpriced assets is no longer an issue. Still hanging out there with no real substantive policy discussion is Financial Reform. Has the current administration forgotten the complete lack of oversight by the SEC in the areas of derivatives, credit default swaps, and all those fancy little arrangements that allowed imprudent lenders to pass the trash? Where also is a hard look at Moody’s and other raters that actually applied a triple A label to stuff that is still unraveled? Why aren’t we fixing what is obviously broken?
Dizard at Financial Times asks the question. What is the status of the structural reforms and laws required to fix the broken securities markets? It’s a very good question because both the SEC and the FED failed in their oversight duties of several markets. They’ve both asserted they didn’t have the legal standing to act or to provide that oversight. In that case, we have another example of oversight malpractice by the congressional committees designed to keep the financial and banking systems strong. They need to sort out responsibilities and enact laws to ensure oversight exists.
Here is one of the articles major points which is reform of rating agencies. He sees no progress on that front and believes we’re seeing some major maneuvering that ensures job security and protects fragile egos.
The financial system has a peacetime officer corps in a wartime situation. The people in positions of responsibility are principally interested in preserving their careers and avoiding public embarrassment. There are rare and important exceptions, such as Paul Volcker, who has nothing to prove about his integrity, and who is past any need to advance his career.
To identify what has to be done to put securities markets, banking and regulation on a sound basis for the future, the people at the top might have to admit to the specifics of their own past mistakes. They would also need a command of detail of the workings of the financial system that they have avoided acquiring over the years, since it was much more advantageous to spend one’s time scheming and toadying.
This is a naturally occurring aspect of human nature, but it is usually kept in check by periodic crises, which thin the herd and force the survivors to adapt. The “great moderation”, also known as periodic monetary bail-outs, in developed countries for the past couple of decades has prevented that process.
Let’s consider a specific issue, the reform of the leading US ratings agencies…So what are the federal regulators, and Congress, actually doing about ratings agency reform?
Obama Team Announces TARP Plan: Market Crashes
Posted: February 10, 2009 Filed under: Equity Markets, Global Financial Crisis, New Orleans, president teleprompter jesus, Team Obama, U.S. Economy | Tags: Depression, Geithner, Obama presser, Obamanomics, TARP 2 CommentsI hope you weren’t planning on using any of those savings that you may still have left sitting out there in anything market-related soon. The Dow Jones ( at this writing) is off over 350 points. All of the blue chip components tumbled. The S&P and OTC markets aren’t faring any better. This is how Market Watch sees it right now:
The recent strength shown by U.S. stocks vanished on Tuesday as the government unveiled a new bank-rescue plan and congressional action neared on a fresh round of fiscal stimulus for the wheezing U.S. economy.
That basically amounts to a reaction of last night’s speechification and presser and this morning’s announcement of thunderous boos. Fed Chair Ben Bernanke is speaking right now and that’s not really helping either. The investment/business community doesn’t think any of the largess from either the TARP or the Stimulus Plan are really going to do anything. Treasury Bond prices are dropping also. This additional snippet from Market Watch sums it up well.
“First, we’re going to require banking institutions to go through a carefully designed comprehensive stress test, to use the medical term. We want their balance sheets cleaner, and stronger. And we are going to help this process by providing a new program of capital support for those institutions which need it,” said Geithner.
Despite the forceful words, Geithner noted his office was still exploring options and details for an asset value program, with little answer on what to do about banks’ toxic assets.
That last paragraph is basically at the crux of the problem. The current administration is bringing no plan to the table to actually deal with the problem. Perhaps because Geithner was so instrumental in the original TARP, he’s just sticking with what already didn’t work rather than trying to think outside of the box. The market has lost around 3-4% already and there’s several more hours of trading to go. Hang on to your cookie jars kids, you’re going to need them as a stable replacement for your local bank.
Meanwhile, the senate managed to pass that the stimulus bill 61-37. That’s way shy of the 80 votes that Obama had wanted. The final bill has $838 billion worth of stuff that includes a lot of tax cuts (not likely to stimulate anything but Grover Norquist and The Club for Growth) and money for cash strapped states. I’ve brought up links to the Economic Policy Institute earlier but I really like this graph that even my freshmen could grasp about what works and doesn’t work in stimulus plans.
You can see the difference between the items where you get more bang than a buck and less than a buck’s worth of bang while contributing to the deficit. Notice those tax cuts that wind up costing more than they stimulate and think the last eight years of Dubya of which we seem to be repeating.
Here’s one that I picked up from Brad DeLong’s Grasping Reality with Both Hands that had my Freshman gasping as I was trying to set their hair afire. (I think it worked, btw.) Any one facing this job market should panic. Just anecdotal, but in the market for finance professors, this year universities were taking resumes only at the last two conferences. Last year, the best people had been hired up before either of the conferences were held and only the marginal remained. The hottest academic jobs are definitely on hold. In my years of both public and private sector economisting, I’ve NEVER seen anything like this.
Please notice the incredible level of job losses. If you’ve managed to get through a calculus course, you’ll see that the first, second and third derivatives are negative which is not true on the other series at similar points. Basically, for you nonmath types, this indicates nothing but a downward trend or as I like to put it, straight off a cliff.
So, President Obama rambled an economics lecture last night that made me happy that he was getting all those economics briefings. It was also pretty obvious that most of his advisers must have their hair on fire too, because he did have a sense of edgy panic when he talked about the situation. However, ‘edgy panic’ is not what I want in a president. I want a president to talk about we have nothing to fear but fear itself who then says something to the effect of let’s do what works instead of bargaining away what will with folks that aren’t interested in watching you succeed.
I have to say, last night over Margaritas with my neighbors, I was searching for folks that wanted to diversify their food options with neighborhood gardening. I had a lot of takers. After all, when the army and your police force spend a good amount of time and money flying sleek black helicopters around the skies of your city practicing for food riots, it’s kind of one of those wake up moments. That goes for sleepy freshmen and drunk Cajuns. Is your hair on fire yet? Because if it isn’t, you haven’t been listening.
Meanwhile, I’m adding a page to my own blog for sharing sustainability and survival stories. Feel free to visit and contribute.
Really Bad Numbers = ?
Posted: December 31, 2008 Filed under: Equity Markets, Team Obama, U.S. Economy Comments Off on Really Bad Numbers = ?I’ve tried to lay off my econ-based threads so all those that celebrate national crass consumerism day could stay off the window ledges instead, enjoying the yuletide fireplace. This year, I’m earning my title as dismal scientist and this post is not full of seasonal cheer.
Employment: The level of continuing first time unemployment claims stands at a 26-year high of 4.51 million. The 1982 recession was the worst post WW2 recession to date.
2008 Yearly Market Performance: (11 year lows)
| U.S. indexes | |
| Dow Jones Industrial Average | -35% |
| S&P 500 | -39% |
| Nasdaq | -42% |
| Dow Jones Financials | -55% |
| Amex Oil Index | -38% |
Housing: House prices have fallen to their 2004 level. Sales of both existing houses and new construction are miserably low. Resales were down 10.6%f this year. Basically, we’re seeing the fastest decrease in sales on record.
Consumer Confidence:
The Reuters/University of Michigan survey of consumers rose to 60.1, better than a preliminary reading of 59.1 released earlier this month and topping the 58.5 reading forecast by economists’ surveyed by MarketWatch.
It also marked a sharp improvement from November’s 55.3 reading, a 28-year low…
The index has tumbled 20% from last year and 38% from a peak reached in Jan. 2007





Recent Comments