Sima Dives In

I received the opportunity to take part in a small survey from Bold Progressives late on Tuesday night.  It was only three questions, and I thought I’d post my answers here to start my Introduction:

In general, what are you thinking tonight?
I am a liberal, not a progressive, although at one time those seemed the same.  I think too much trust was placed in a leader who had no experience, no proven record and nothing to show for his life but a couple ghost written books and the ability to make people believe in him.  I think that means we’ve had a comeuppance that was as deserved as it was cruel.  I think we have to go back to work… next question.

What do you think the progressive movement should do next? As in, immediately…
Go back to the basics.  Start elucidating and spouting progressive and liberal ideals in easy to understand bits.  Don’t go all professorial on the people, talk to them like they are friends and compatriots, because they are.  We have to tease out the liberal streak that runs deep in most Americans and get it to shine.

Do you think Pres. Obama and congressional Dems should fight harder for progressive policies or seek middle ground with Republicans? (Please elaborate.)
NO middle ground.  Fight, Fight, FIGHT.  I think the middle ground has made this defeat.  I mean, Feingold lost?  Why? Because he went back on his promises and was two-faced about that stupid health care bill.  My Senator, Murray, is struggling.  Not because she is a bad person, but because when the country wanted change to the left, real health care, a public option or medicare for all, we got big insurance’s wet dream.  Murray couldn’t stop it, nor could Feingold.  Obama could have, but didn’t because he is bought and sold.  We need a leader that is willing to betray his or her class (always the upper class) like FDR or Johnson.  Until we get that leader, it’s time to protest, even if it’s Obama’s White House we are protesting.  It’s time to meet and march and get people stirred up.  It’s time for anti-war pickets on every street corner.  It’s time to be heard, not taken for granted.  If we stand up, others will stand up with us.   This will not be easy, but mark my words, it will be done, or America is going to devolve into greedy mediocrity.

In these answers I paid too much attention to health care (which worries me personally right now) and not enough to the economy, un- and under-employment, anti-war protests, women’s rights, farming problems and more.  But my basic goal remains the same regardless.  It’s time for me to go beyond reading blogs, beyond nodding in agreement, beyond speaking up timidly, if at all, when friends say something ludicrous.  It’s time to stand up.

I’m starting with the first cause that got me truly politically active.  Like everyone else in this country, I went into shock after 9/11.  The event generated a huge amount of fear for me, fear not of terrorists, but fear of the horrible backlash I knew would come from our government.  I watched Bush read his stupid book and thought, “He can do anything he wants now, we are doomed.”

The stupid ineffective actions taken after 9/11, the build-up to the Afghan and then Iraq wars told me I was right, we were doomed.  The thought galvanized me, and I found protest groups on the Internet and made myself, shy geeky me, go to the meetings.  We organized and protested twice a week right on the corner in my home-town, right by where the ferry from Seattle empties.  We got honks and waves of support, we got spat on and cursed, we got nearly run over.  We stood in the rain, we stood in the hot sun.  Some of us travelled and got beat up by police as we marched.  My very small town doesn’t beat up demonstrators, thankfully;  not enough of us, and not nearly enough of them.  We made signs.  We went to meetings with our Congress people, and got them to change their minds about a few things concerning the potential war(s), the Patriot Act, supporting Bush blindly, and more.  My Congressman acted on what we’d discussed.  We shouted, we yelled.  Did we make a difference?  Don’t know.  But it made me feel as though what I had to say was at least heard.

We continued protesting after the Iraq war started and more people joined us.  Then the 2008 election rolled around.  Suddenly it seemed as though all the protests died.  Not in Our Name folded up and went home, I suppose they assumed the new President would do the right thing.  Other peace groups just withered, but didn’t die.  No-one protested on the corner any more.  I admit I turned my mind and work to other things.  And on the back burner these last two years the wars have simmered; killing more people, maiming innocents, sending home crippled and devastated young men and women, fuelling anti-American hatred all over, creating a servant soldier class out of our jobless youth, and more, so much more.

So it’s time to pick up the protest banners, the signs and slogans and start fighting again.  Here’s a bit of what I’ve gleaned while updating my moribund peace/anti-war links and searching the Internet.

Peace Action is still at work. Indeed I still get regular emails from them.

United for Peace and Justice is still very active. They started out in 2002 as a coalition of local anti-war and civil rights groups. They recently organized days of action in October. They were in Seattle, but only a few of them. Next time, I’ll be there.

Military Families Speak Out is still going strong. They need a new director.

Courage to Resist. This is an organization that supports members of the military who refuse to go to Iraq or Afghanistan.

Voters for Peace still sends me regular emails. They have regularly scheduled events.

CodePink is still doing stuff. Their webpage’s first link is about making Hillary Clinton doing business Blackwater. I’m not impressed because they’ve always seemed really anti-Clinton to me, but there’s the link for what it’s worth.

There are many anti-war resources linked from at the Holt Labor Library.

Generally, I will be writing about farming, gardening, dirt type concerns here at Sky Dancing. There’s a lot happening with the Federal Government on the food front, and most of it is bad for family farms, but we can change that! I will also sometimes do more Anti-War posts, if people are interested. I’m going to put a bit of bio type information in the comment thread to this post, in order to not make a long post longer.


Looking to the Future

With the ink barely dry on the analysis of the 2010 elections and some of the results still unknown, the pundit class is already out with their prognostications for 2012.  I’m not sure I want to see their future but it’s not always the wanting that makes one look.

Here’s one from The Hill called ‘You think -’10 was tough?  Check out ’12.’  This little fact grabs one’s attention.

For the first time in two cycles, Democrats will have more seats up for grabs than the Republicans, and the party could see its shrunken majority erased altogether.

That’s just looking at the impact for the national level.  Here’s some numbers from the state level at National Journal.

Republicans picked up 680 seats in state legislatures, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures — the most in the modern era. To put that number in perspective: In the 1994 GOP wave, Republicans picked up 472 seats. The previous record was in the post-Watergate election of 1974, when Democrats picked up 628 seats.

The GOP gained majorities in at least 14 state house chambers. They now have unified control — meaning both chambers — of 26 state legislatures.

That control is a particularly bad sign for Democrats as they go into the redistricting process. If the GOP is effective in gerrymandering districts in many of these states, it could eventually lead to the GOP actually expanding its majority in 2012.

I know we’ve discussed this before, but the question has to be re-asked.  How did we get to the point where the GOP looks ascendant at a time when every one felt that Dubya/Cheney had destroyed the party for years to come?   The NYT has suggested that it was part of a GOP comeback plan but I don’t see it that way. They had help from the establishment Democrats with their arrogance and insistent that we all just vote for them and they’d do what’s best for us.

The White House struggled to keep Democrats in line, with a misplaced confidence in the power of the coalition that propelled Mr. Obama into office. Republicans capitalized on backlash to the ambitious agenda Mr. Obama and his party pursued, which fueled unrestricted and often anonymous contributions to conservative groups, some advised by a nemesis Democrats thought they had shaken, Karl Rove. That money so strengthened the Republican assault across the country that an exasperated Democratic party strategist likened it to “nuclear Whac-a-Mole.”

Most of all, Republican leaders had the foresight to imagine the possibility of winning again. Even now, they believe they could have taken back the Senate if they had just managed to block at least two Tea Party candidates who proved unelectable.

I’m sorry.  I don’t think people like the GOP or their message and if you check they polls, they still blame the economy and a lot of the problems on Dubya and his GOP cronies.  This election was not FOR the Republicans.  It was against the Democratic Party and you-know-who.  We’ve had at least three “change and change now” mandates in a row.  No one appears to be really listening in the District.

There were two observations I’d like to make.  One is that the worst of the Tea Party candidates lost in all but a few states. The second is that a lot of the Dems that lost were the from the Blue Dawg side of the party. I’m still trying to think about what those two trends say when taken together.  The other numbers trend was that the midwest went so red.   Given the looming redistricting and the importance of state machinations to presidential campaigns, 2012 could be the Superbowl of modern elections.

Stay tuned and let us know what you think.




What’s a voter to do?

This year seems to be just one bad choice after another for mid term voting. I have a blue dawg Democrat–Charlie Melancon–running for Senate that appalled me last week by saying this was a “Christian nation” and that he hoped it remained so in the televised debate with David Vitter. David Vitter came off as more reasonable with his answer and I thought that was an impossibility. I closed my check book on that one and am looking at the Green Party Candidate now. What a Hobson’s choice!

I can’t vote for the Democratic Congressman for reasons I wrote about earlier. So, that’s almost a Sophie’s choice. I wanted to like you Cedric, but you’ve just had too many ethics lapses that they’ve caught you on! That makes me wonder what lurks uncaught.

Bostonboomer linked this morning to a post over at Corrente by Valhalla on how the Democratic Party is no longer the beneficiary of a gender gap. No wonder. With this odd assortment of blue dawgs, Jane-Crow-adherents-of-Stupakistan, and fall-in-line to pass anything cowards, where’s a vote to go these days?

I cannot divorce my vote from the issues or the fact I live in New Orleans which is still reeling from Hurricane Katrina and now the BP oil spill and a horrid governor. I do not believe that putting in whacko tea party candidates is going to do one’s state or municipality any good during a tough recovery. I also think if a critical mass go with Speaker of the House Agent Orange–Snookie of the Radical Right Prudes–we’re going to lose ground in a big way. This election season is the original rock and a hard place. I only hope and pray for a few years of gridlock at this rate!

Anway, I just wanted to let you know that we’ll have live links and live blogging tomorrow so you can bring you voices, votes, and on-the-ground poll stories to every one here. Again, we’re a sharing place so I expect they’ll be an assortment of choices and varying levels of anger and disappointment.

Maybe one of us will have a few bright spots in an otherwise bleak elections season. I have one candidate that I’m strongly voting for and that’s Caroline Fayard who is running for Lt. Governor. I’d like a liberal woman in there to offset the horrible Bobby Jindal whose policy has been like the thing from Honey Island Swamp. She’s worth rooting for.

Every thing else appears to be choice-gone-bad.