Women and the Great Recession

Nataliya is a single mother with two children. She runs a small business selling flowers in downtown Uzhgorod, Ukraine.

Nataliya is a single mother with two children. She runs a small business selling flowers in downtown Uzhgorod, Ukraine.

A colleague of mine sent me a link to the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College where they do a lot of research on Gender Equality and Economic Issues. The Institute’s Rania Antonopoulos has just released a very interesting study on The Current Economic and Financial Crisis:
A Gender Perspective
. It is an interesting addition to a growing field that finds that “widespread economic recessions and protracted financial crises have been documented as setting back gender equality and other development goals”.   Problems with development goals include food insecurity, poverty and increasing inequality.

I learned that women’s economic and social role in an economy is one of the primary indicators of when and if a country will every creep its way off the bottom of Human Development index when I began to study development economics way back in the late 70s and early 1980s.  Development economics spends a lot of time on institutions these days. I do a lot of my research into the depth and effectiveness of financial institutions. There are also legal institutions (like lack of government corruption and presence of an effective justice system) that make an important difference too.  But, overlying all of these institutional institutions is the society’s treatment of women.  Women’s access to education, birth control, and economic-self determination are essential to a country’s overall development.  This is especially true for developing nations but it holds true for industrialized ones as well.

Antonopoulos poses an interesting question for those of us interested in both eliminating poverty and achieving gender equality throughout the world.  She asks “what macroeconomic conditions must prevail for gender-equality processes to take root?”  and argues that women’s rights can only be achieved if economic development is “broadly  shared”.    I was particularly awed by her treatment of women in her study.

Hence, women in this analysis are not featured as passive recipients of gender-equality policies, but rather as full citizens participating at all levels of economic, political, and social life. As active members of the community, women have a stake in putting forward comprehensive, coherent, and consistent proposals instead of being content with a piecemeal agenda that targets the “poor” and “women.”

I like this definition of equality as ‘full participation’ in all aspects of a community although I would add that as stake holders women (and indeed GLBT and other minorities kept in an inequality gulag) not only should achieve full participation but also full rewards for that participation.

One of the most compelling arguments that she makes for Gender Awareness is that frequently women’s most important roles in the local economy are in nonpaying jobs.  She argues that you really can’t take any policy into full account unless you study the impact on all of women’s contributions to the economy.  That includes work that does not entail monetary compensation but is welfare-enhancing.

While the former (paid work) in the private and public sectors (under formal contracts or informal arrangement) is largely recognized, unpaid work, which includes unpaid family work contributions, subsistence production, collection of free goods from common lands and volunteer work, household maintenance, and unpaid care work for family members and communities, still remains hidden and, hence, outside policy consideration.

These contributions are still the dominant areas for women in traditional societies.  It has been shown that women who

Mrs. Som Neang, age 53, is married and lives with her two children in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. She and her husband, Mr. Ban Boeun, 59, have a small business selling eggs and a variety of vegetables in a busy market.

Mrs. Som Neang, age 53, is married and lives with her two children in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. She and her husband, Mr. Ban Boeun, 59, have a small business selling eggs and a variety of vegetables in a busy market.

understand health and nutrition issues as well as women who are educated and value education contribute a lot to an economy when they serve in these traditional capacities.  Educated women contribute through their children who are healthier and go on to achieve better outcomes in life.

There is also impact, however, on women who work outside the homes and women are concentrated in jobs that tend to suffer greatly during bad economic times.  Any time energy or food prices increase, development goals and gender equality goals suffer setbacks. Antonopolous forwards some broad areas where women tend to suffer most from any economic crisis.

“Among the emerging challenges of the current crisis, we now turn to the turbulence in the world of women’s work in four key areas: paid work (especially in textiles and agriculture); informal work; unpaid work; and fluctuations in remittances, including those from women migrant workers.”

Employment is always one of the slowest things to recovery from a macroeconomic downturn.  The last set of recessions resulting from the Asian Financial crisis as well as other country-specific downturns showed that employment recovery has been even more slow than recovery from recessions earlier in the post world war 2 years.  Current data is rich in information on how this impacts women’s equality goals.

Read the rest of this entry »


Heaven has Fjords

fjordWhen ever I hear folks rant and rave on the evils of European Social Democracies and how horrid they are, I always ask them to name the country that comes up consistently with the highest literacy rates in the world, lowest infant mortality, and much higher the the USA GDP per capita, and at the same time has  what you would probably call the world’s most complete cradle-to-grave welfare state.  Of course, no one knows the answer because so many folks here have been brainwashed into thinking productivity, budget surpluses, high standards of living, and great education and health care are not possible in socialist states.  Well, they are really wrong.

Without a doubt, the best country to live in the world these days going strictly by the statistics (and not the weather) is Norway.  Take a look at the CIA fact book for all the good stuff on Norway then take a look at  the United States.  Norway has bested the USA in standard of living for quite some time.  The United States keeps dropping on all lists and just in GDP per capita is now sitting at number 10.  Norway is ranked first on the Human Development index of 177 countries, so essentially they are number one country for living the good life.  It is second, only to Luxembourg, for GDP per capita.

Today’s New York Times covers the little country that can and its stellar economic performance in today’s global economic crisis.    A lot of credit is goes to Norway’s socialist finance minister Kristin Halvorsen.  She’s in charge of Norway’s $300 billion sovereign wealth fund that has been steadily buying stocks since March and is used to build a decent standard of living for every one in that country.  Norway likes its government and its government works well. The Times article contrasts the economics of the U.S. and Norway and the U.S. comes up way short.

Read the rest of this entry »


A Short Treatise on Economic Development and the Role of Culture

Another little essay from my bag of tricks, hopefully this one is easier to grok than the last

Recently, economic development literature has stopped presupposing the existence of formal institutions like property rights and rule of law.  It now examines the norms or social values that promote exchange, savings, and investment.  This new line of research argues there is a cultural dimension to economic behavior. It is difficult to precisely define culture, but this line of research identifies cultural influences as “the informal shared values, norms, meanings, and behaviors that characterize human societies” (Fukuyama, 2001).

Traditional neoclassical economics downplays the role of specific societal norms in economic choice.  The first chinese-tigersimplifying assumption in most models is that Homo Economus is a rational utility maximizing agent. This assumption underlies the simplest microeconomic model to the more complex macroeconomic and trade models.  This means that human behavior is invariant across human societies.  Culture, religion, tradition, and all other forms of societal identification are some residual factor accounted for within the white noise of random variation.  Most sociologists will argue that cultural norms pervade economic choices and that an economy cannot be completely understood without understanding these cultural factors (Granovetter, 1985).  Economists tend to presuppose shared norms.  One of the reasons we see this is that cultural factors are methodologically very difficult to quantify, measure, and disentangle from other factors.

Economic historian Douglas North was one of the first economists to revive culturalist interpretations of economic development in the 1980s and 1990s.  Institutionalists began to recognize the importance of norms in economic choices.  North (1990) argued that institutions that are run by either formal or informal rules are critical in reducing transaction costs.  This makes them essential to promoting economic efficiency.  If a society, for example, cannot agree on property rights, there would be no incentive for innovators to take risks or make investments.  Institutional economists like North, began to pay attention to more than just the rational, maximizing behaviors of agents (including households and business) and became interested in studying the importance of factors like history, culture, tradition and what is now known as ‘path dependent’ variables that have  a role in shaping economic behavior and choices.

Besides a renewed interest in these things by institutionalists, it also became more apparent that traditional approaches to economic development were having mixed success depending on which continent you were studying. kachinadolls3The same factors examined in countries that were part of the Asian Tigers or Asian Miracle showed differing levels of importance when compared to the transition economies of the old Soviet successor states.  Many Eastern European countries had to set up formal market institutions as well as judicial and political systems.  It became evident that countries like Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic were experiencing relatively smooth transitions from centrally-planned economies.  Russia and the Ukraine were experiencing many more troubles.  Their institutions were generally weak and the levels of corruption were astounding.

As a result of these and the many challenges still presenting themselves in the Middle East and Africa, the World Bank and the IMF began to more closely examine cultural variables in their traditional development models.  They begin to find that some uniquely Asian cultural characteristics were at play in the Asian Tiger countries. As a result, we now have a large amount of literature that studies culture factors and economic and financial development.

There are basically four channels that have become the focus of this line of literature.  The first is the impact of cultural institutions on organization and production.  The second is cultural factors that influence attitudes towards work and consumption. The third factor is how culture impacts the ability to create and then manage institutions.  The last is the creation of social networks.  Let’s look at each of these a bit more in depth.

Read the rest of this entry »