Tuesday Cartoons: RFK Jr is Full of Shit.
Posted: May 13, 2025 Filed under: just because 8 Comments
Hey, I’m just so sick and tired of yam tits and his regime. Today we will just keep it quick with a few newsy updates and then the cartoons.
Disgusting.
You want to know what else is fucking disgusting:
Yeah, who takes their grandkids down to swim in a toxic sewer:
This asshole. Gross.
In world news:
What is your birth month? Mine is April, and all I can say is the image is completely on point:
Have a safe day, this is an open thread.
peej
Carissa
bostonboomer
ecocatwoman
mablue2
peggysue22
quixote
skydancingguestblogger
Mona (aka Wonk the Vote)
Sky Dancing 
You know, I bet they just arrested her …knowing there was absolutely no reason for an arrest. These mistakes are nothing more than, do it anyway…we can get away with it :
The United States of Racism.
The Big Trump Move No One’s Noticed
A bureaucratic rule changed how America defined racism. Now Trump is undoing it.
Christopher Caldwell
Three weeks ago, Donald Trump struck another blow to the civil-rights regime. It was easy to miss, given he did so through an executive order aimed at a legal concept. But the president has taken another step toward uprooting the second constitution that has been in place since the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Trump’s Executive Order 14281, aimed at “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy,” targets the judicial doctrine of “disparate impact,” which has stood since the 1970s.
You may not know the ins and outs of disparate impact, but you’ve surely seen its effects. Under disparate impact, a business owner can be found guilty of discrimination even if he did not intend to discriminate. An aptitude test that winds up narrowing the pool of eligible black candidates, height requirements that exclude women from a police force, a job application that asks about criminal records—any hiring process that produces a lower-than-random number of protected minorities is suspect. Such actions and institutions might carry no ill intent, but they can put an employer on the wrong side of civil-rights law.
I ran Nato – now we need a new alliance against Trump
UK and economic allies should retaliate against ‘autocratic’ Trump in trade wars, argues former Nato secretary general Anders Fogh Rasmussen
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/ran-nato-new-alliance-against-trump-3688646
Rob Hastings
Special Projects Editor
“For decades, the Nato alliance has protected the UK and other members througha simple bond – any act of war against one nation counts as an attack on all of them. Thirty-two countries would automatically unite to fight back.
Now, a former leader of the defence organisation is calling for a new pact among liberal democracies to deter economic bullies from launching trade wars – even if that means “retaliating” against Nato’s most powerful member, the US.
Anders Fogh Rasmussen, who served as Nato’s secretary general from 2009 to 2014, is rallying for the UK to club together in a “D7” pact with the EU, Canada, Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand.
It would primarily be aimed at facing down any threats from China, which has potential strangleholds on global supplies of critical minerals, tech hardware, energy components and even life-saving medicines.
However, this body could also prompt Britain and its partners to confront the “autocratic” Donald Trump in unison if he tries to extort allies, the former Danish prime minister told The i Paper in an interview.
“If we come under pressure from China or maybe the US – through tariffs or whatever – then we should help each other,” said Rasmussen, who remains an influential figure in defence and diplomatic circles.
“Economic coercion against one of the D7 members should be considered an attack on all of us, so we should respond collectively.
“This group of solid democracies would represent 30 to 40 per cent of the global economy – that’s a formidable force… We should also engage in free-trade agreements, investment agreements, and help each other on delivering critical minerals.”
Asked if this risks angering Trump, Rasmussen replied: “That’s actually the purpose: to provoke him. To tell the Americans: if you want to become isolated in the world, so be it, you’re welcome, but we can do without you.”
“I would still love to see the US as the leader of the free world. But Trump has declared a trade war against the whole world, so we have to find an appropriate response… to show they will pay the price with their America First nationalist policy.”