The Uncertainty Blues

There are several headlines today that you really don’t want to see if you’re hoping for an economic recovery.  This one is especially chilling:  ‘Home prices fall 4.1%, near 2009 lows’. There are good reasons this doesn’t bode well.  The first is that the construction sector is a large economic generator in our economy and it also is a job generator. The second is that when people feel less wealthy, they spend less.  Both tend to have recessionary effects.  It doesn’t look like things will improve either.

And things may get a lot worse, said Robert Shiller, a Yale economist and half of the Case-Shiller team, in a web conference after the report’s release.

“There’s a substantial risk of home prices falling another 15%, 20% or 25% more,” he said.

Shiller cited a few reasons for his bearish stance. The government is expected to reduce the presence of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the housing market. These agencies currently provide loan guarantees for about two-thirds of mortgages. If they fade away, private mortgage money will have to fill the gap and the cost of mortgage borrowing will surely rise. That will hurt home prices.

There’s also talk of possibly ending the mortgage interest tax deduction for many homeowners. Meanwhile, the weak economic recovery may be threatened by higher oil prices as a result of turmoil in the Mideast.

At the web conference, Shiller’s index partner Karl Case wasn’t much more optimistic.

“I see [the market] bouncing along the bottom with a slight negative trend,” said Case, an economics professor emeritus at Wellesley College.

Unrest in Libya and Bahrain are also driving up oil prices. Both of these countries are oil producers.  This also drove stock market prices lower.  This is also not good as stock market decreases also make people feel poorer so they spend less.  Additionally, higher gas prices forces people to readjust their budgets.

U.S. investors returned from the long holiday weekend in a selling mode amid increased concern about developments in North Africa and the Middle East.

Global financial markets recoiled overnight as Libya appeared on the verge of civil war and continuing protests in Bahrain sent crude prices surging. After Brent crude futures approached $110 per barrel in London, benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) surged above $91 per barrel in New York trading midday Tuesday.

Higher energy prices threaten the global economic recovery, on which much of the two-year rally in stocks has been based. Heading into this week, the S&P was up 100% from its March 2009 low, meaning both that continued growth is “priced into” stocks and there a lot of paper profits waiting to be booked.

In recent trading, the S&P was down 1.6% while the Dow was off 1.1% and the Nasdaq by more than 2%.

On top of this, we still have high unemployment coupled with increasing threats of lay offs for state and local workers.  Any lay offs or decreases in wages and benefits has the same effect: it makes people feel poor and makes them re-arrange their budgets.   Unions have been largely responsible for benefits and salary levels enjoyed by all workers. Any attempts to further erode collective bargaining is sure to suppress wages and benefits in all sectors.  Several polls today seem to indicate that most people are aware of this and oppose weakening unions.  Here’s one such poll from USA Today.

Americans strongly oppose laws taking away the collective bargaining power of public employee unions, according to a new USA TODAY/Gallup Poll. The poll found 61% would oppose a law in their state similar to such a proposal in Wisconsin, compared with 33% who would favor such a law.

All of this uncertainty is sure to impact the economic outlook.  Many of these are indicative further weakening. Remember, tax cuts for businesses work only if they have revenues.  They won’t have increased revenues without customers.  Higher oil prices–as well as higher prices for other commodities like food–are likely to transfer dollars away from discretionary spending.  We could see further weakening in the demand for consumer durables like cars and big appliances.  I’ve noticed some rather spectacular sales this weekend for these items.  We’ll see in a few months if those commercials today are acts of desperation to unload inventory.

It appears that many in government are purposefully trying to shrink not only the government but also the economy. I’m not sure why every one has decided to go to faith based tax cuts rather than rely on economic theory.  It’s as if years of experience and evidence have been thrown out the window.  Many Republican governors are doing the same thing that created budget problems for Wisconsin.  They are creating deficits by passing tax cuts benefiting the rich and passing the sacrifice to the poor and middle class. The poor and middle class are the consumers that really matter in an economic crunch.  They spend most of their money and they do it on goods that generate local jobs. Remember, this just happened at the national level too. We’ve seen tax cuts go predominantly to the wealthy while talk of benefit cuts are rampant.

State budgets across the country are in disarray as a weak economy, the end of tens of billions in Recovery Act funds, and a GOP-led House that is pushing for deep cuts to many programs that benefit state and local governments set the stage for massive in shortfalls over the next two years. Instead of making the tough choices necessary to help their states weather the current crisis with some semblance of the social safety net and basic government services intact, Republican governors are instead using it as an opportunity to advance several longtime GOP projects: union busting, draconian cuts to social programs, and massive corporate tax breaks. These misplaced priorities mean that the poor and middle class will shoulder the burden of fiscal austerity, even as the rich and corporations are asked to contribute even less.

Follow that Think Progress link to find some of the worst states with worst abuses.  Arizona tops the list.

Now, however, Governor Jan Brewer is proposing to kick some 280,000 Arizonans, mostly childless adults, off the state’s Medicaid rolls. Brewer claims such a move is the only way to get the state’s fiscal house in order, as it would save $541.5 million in general funding spending. Brewer also wants to save $79.8 million by dropping 5,200 “seriously mentally ill” people from the state’s Medicaid program. Instead of balancing out these draconian cuts with additional revenue increases or simply not making the cuts in the first place, Brewer instead signed $538 million in corporate tax cuts into law two weeks ago.

Other states to watch out for are New Jersey, Texas, Michigan, Ohio and of, course, Wisconsin.  Here’s an example from Florida.

Scott’s radical budget proposal, unveiled at a tea party event, includes $4.6 billion in spending cuts that would result in the direct loss of more than 8,000 jobs. It would also privatize large areas of state services, including juvenile justice facilities, Medicaid, and some hospitals. Education spending would be cut by more than $3 billion and teachers and other public employees would see their pensions under threat. Such deep cuts in essential programs and services are necessary to offset Scott’s proposal to cut corporate and property taxes by at least $4 billion.

If these things occur, you can look forward to a return to the Depression Years.  I guarantee it.


14 Comments on “The Uncertainty Blues”

  1. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    I think I’ve already returned to depression status, but I guess it could get worse.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      I’ve definitely had a drop in standard of living since about 2-3 years ago. But then, I’m one of those lazy state workers.

    • Rikke's avatar Sima says:

      I’ve much needed repairs on the house to make, and I’m not sure I can afford to do so. But I must. It’s the only thing of value (sort of) that I own free and clear. Parents have said they will help, which is humbling and humiliating in a way. I mean, I’m almost 50.

      A commentor on one of my local real estate blogs has said for about 5 years that real estate prices will drop 40 or 50% or more from their highs. Everyone poo-pooed him. But Seattle prices are down about 28% already, and they aren’t showing any signs of rising.

      http://seattlebubble.com/blog/2011/02/22/case-shiller-welcome-back-to-2004-seattle/

      I’m scared we won’t end up at 2004 prices, but 1994 prices.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        Seattle has some pretty outrageous house prices plus they’ve been overbuilding condos. I think with Boeing going and Microsoft expanding overseas that it will continue. Fundamentals always will out.

  2. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Some Republican Governors Attempt To Steer Clear Of Wisconsin Strategy

    After receiving high-profile support from Republican leaders across the country for his efforts to slash state government spending by limiting unions’ collective bargaining rights, a trio of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s GOP counterparts expressed reservations on Tuesday about pursuing the same strategy in their states.

    In Indiana, Gov. Mitch Daniels called on Republicans state legislators to stand down on their push for a so-called right-to-work bill, arguing that would interfere with other legislative priorities, including education reform.

    [….]

    Meanwhile, in Florida newly-elected GOP Gov. Rick Scott said that Gov. Walker was right to try to curtail public employee benefits, but differed on the question of collective bargaining.

    “My belief is as long as people know what they’re doing, collective bargaining is fine,” Scott said in an interview with a local Tallahassee radio station on Tuesday.

    And in Pennsylvania, a spokesman for Republican Gov. Tom Corbett, said earlier this week that while the governor would be willing to sign a right-to-work bill “that’s not a top priority of his right now.”

    Instead, spokesman Kevin Harley said Corbett plans to try to cut the size of government without taking away the rights of state employees to organize.

    We’ll see if the tea party crowd pays attention. Republicans–they always overreach.

    • Rikke's avatar Sima says:

      We need to come with another name than ‘right to work’. I know, it will be hard to spread the meme, but we might be able to do so…

      Right to slavery
      Return to the 30’s bill
      Give yourself to the rich man
      Take away your rights

      Naw, all my ideas suck. Any better ones?

      • bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

        “Right to work” is old-time right wing terminology. Unfortunately they always seem to win the linguistic battles.

      • Rikke's avatar Sima says:

        It is weird how they win those battles, isn’t it? Wonder why that is? Is the propaganda arm of the left wing really inept? Or do the messages just not resonate so much with Americans? Both?

      • Seems like it’s always some version of center right (e.g. Obama Reagan Ds) vs. rightwing (GOP) vs. batshit right (teaparty) battling out the messaging, so it’s not so much a question of whether the right will win the message but often rather a question of just how rightwing it will be.

  3. minkoffminx's avatar Minkoff Minx says:

    Great post Dak, if things do go towards a real depression, how the hell will we get out of it this time?

    • Rikke's avatar Sima says:

      Elect someone with the guts to actually do something, someone who cares? Man, I dunno. Too bad Bill can’t run again (and I say that knowing he’s far to the right of me on many things).

  4. Pilgrim's avatar Pilgrim says:

    If economy weakens and worsens in the coming year or so, what effect will that be apt to have on Obama’s re-election hopes?

    Supposedly, it’s always the economy that’s decisive.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      I’ve been wondering that. They seem to think it will be okay enough to squeeze him through. They sure are normalizing some high unemployment.