Mutual Funds tied to FBI/SEC Probe

I’m feeling a bit like the messenger-in-line-to-be-shot given the hit every one’s savings and retirement plans took during the financial crisis, but, some Mutual Funds are likely to take a hit from the FBI/SEC probe.  I figured that a lot of your probably have some Mutual Funds since it’s a typical vehicle for most middle class savers. You should probably watch this and your fund.  I’m just assuming that you don’t want to incur any more unnecessary asset losses in this environment.

You may recall that the news from the investigation broke a week ago. It is possible that some of the funds are losing value now just based on the information floating around the financial circuits.  Investors and fund managers listen to information, weigh it and consider the impact it will have on future value of the funds.  No need for complete hysteria right now, just some cautious information gathering and staying on top of things.

There’s some information today on Bloomberg and if you have any funds managed by the investigated funds, you may want to look at them with a jaundiced eye right now. The worry is that with so many funds having lost investors that a continuation may bring down some of the major companies that are fund managers.  That would be the worst case scenario and would, of course, lead to another possible tax payer bailout of another industry as these things tend to spread contagion to even healthy, well-managed funds.  As the article mentions, damage to reputation is something that really impacts the value of a company and its ability to attract investors.

Janus Capital Group Inc. and Wellington Management Co. were among firms that received requests for information last week as part of an insider trading investigation involving hedge funds as well as mutual funds. None of the companies have been accused of wrongdoing. All this uncertainty is actually looking good for investing in silver 2016, read on, more details about this below.

The probe hits firms as they try to reverse $90 billion in withdrawals from U.S. stock funds since the beginning of 2009. Damage from the industry’s last run-in with regulators, a series of trading scandals in 2003 and 2004, took years to repair and led to more than $3 billion in fines against more than two dozen firms, including Bank of America Corp., Putnam Investments, Janus and MFS.

The insider information brokerage companies are now under active investigation and they are undoubtedly looking for folks to turn state’s evidence and pouring through client lists.  You should follow this carefully if you have any mutual funds and make sure that your management company does not show up in any articles linking them to the scandal.  This could very likely impact–at least in the short run–fund stability.  Remember, mutual funds are not insured with an agency like the FDIC.  You lose what you have invested should the fund run into trouble.

The focus on mutual funds is fairly recent so the market may still be catching up to the news.  Many pension funds use these mutual funds and it takes a while to remove them from the plan or adjust contributions but institutional investors are usually bound by safety standards and they buy huge amounts of funds.  If one or two of them bail, it can drive the fund price to a lower than NAV or Net Asset Value level if the fund is market-traded. The institutional investor may have to dump the fund based on its safety rating given its fund management rules.

Mutual funds were unscathed by the probes until last week, when Janus and Wellington were among a number of asset managers to receive information requests. Hedge funds Level Global Investors LP, Diamondback Capital Management LLC and Loch Capital Management had their offices raided by U.S. officials. Balyasny Asset Management LP, the Chicago-based hedge fund, said in a Nov. 24 letter to investors that they received a faxed subpoena from the government “requesting a broad set of general information for the last few years.” None of the firms have been accused of wrongdoing.

The mutual-fund companies that were contacted by federal prosecutors declined to comment when called by Bloomberg News on whether they use expert networks and what information they were asked to provide.

Janus, based in Denver, said on Nov. 23 that it received a request for “general information and intends to cooperate fully with that inquiry.” The firm, in a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filing, said it would not provide further updates unless required by law. Janus manages $160.8 billion in assets.

It’s a little early to tell exactly what impact all of this may have, but if your money is heavily invested in mutual funds, I would be watching this carefully.  Anyway, just a heads up!   Morningstar is a good source of fund information.  I rely on their database when I have to do investment research.  This link will provide you with a list of  funds that are undergoing some changes at the moment also.   They also have a blogger dedicated full time to funds.  M*_RusselK has more thoughts and analysis here.  These are my main go-to places for current fund analysis.


32 Comments on “Mutual Funds tied to FBI/SEC Probe”

  1. Dario's avatar Dario says:

    I think that the Obama administration is aware that people are angry that those who committed fraud and brought down the banking system have not gone to jail. So now the DOJ wants to send a few small traders to court and look tough with front page headlines. Martha Stewart should have never gone to jail, but she was the perfect candidate for a front page headline.

    I believe we haven’t had an honest market in years.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      That’s why I didn’t want to do investments as part of my PHD specialities. I refuse to buy into “rational markets” hypothesis and spent all of my time in my doctoral investment classes writing papers looking at how to game the system. My investment professors were surprised I was less interested in making money than muckraking. I think the business is a snake pit and the big guys game markets much like breeders and jockeys game horse races.

  2. minkoffminx's avatar Minkoff Minx says:

    Thanks for the ‘Heads Up” Dak…with all the leaky wikies in the news, something like this would be missed.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      yw … I’m trying to protect my little nest egg. I finally got it in the black with a decent rate of return. Unfortunately, the state of Louisiana forces me into mutual funds so I found out with the Fidelty mess a few years ago, you gotta watch those guys!!! They pull crap all the time!!!

  3. bostonboomer's avatar bostonboomer says:

    Scarecrow: Obama flunks economics with pointless federal wage freeze.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      I thought about writing about that but it’s such an empty gesture and McScrooge kinda thing to do this time of year, I didn’t even want to touch it … glad some one did.

    • mablue2's avatar mablue2 says:

      The Shrill One doesn’t like it either:

      Freeze Frame

      Yep, that’s exactly what we needed: a transparently cynical policy gesture, trivial in scale but misguided in direction, and in effect conceding that your bitter political opponents have the right idea.

      I don’t know what bizarre lessons Obama learned from the “shellacking”. Adopt the silliest Rightwing policies?

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      did you catch this in the comments?

      1st Obama endorses the Bush agenda of spying on and killing americans
      2nd Obama attacks Unions (the F! the UAW moment screams republican)
      3rd Obama double downs on Bush Wars, (now they are Obama wars)
      4th Obama attacks Teacher Unions (teacher unions now hate OBAMA)
      5th Obama does not attack the Banks? he bails them out? (sorta like what the GOP does)
      6th Obama passes the Bob Dole Health Care Bill (Bob Dole is a republican)
      7th Obama kills the Public Option
      8Th Obama kills Drug Importation
      9Th Obama APPOINTS an insurance executive to manage his health care Bill
      10th Obama does not APPOINT Dawn Johnsen
      11th Obama hand picks the cat food commission to destroy Social Security
      12th Obama supports Blanche Lincoln, a candidate who hates Unions, and has no chance of winning
      13 Guantanomo still open for business
      14.Patriot Act renewed
      15. renditions continue
      16. Bernanke reappointed
      17. Americans targeted for assassination
      18 Obama is all for sending more USA jobs off shore
      19 Obama is for tax cuts for the RICH!
      20. Obama and the TSA porno Scandal
      21 Obama freezes federal wages for 2 years

      Yup, this is a socialist agenda, dagummit!!!

    • Dario's avatar Dario says:

      Now that he’s taking on the federal workers, like Reagan took on the air traffic controllers, Obama is hoping that people will see him as a tough disciplined frugal spender. The message he received from the 2010 election is that he needs to work on his image, not do a good job to get the economy working again.

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        Why-oh-why didn’t people take his talking up Reagan so effusively in the campaign seriously?

        • Dario's avatar Dario says:

          Those who followed Obama shared the same irrational perception, always dismissing anything that was negative, like being a Reagan admirer, and accepting anything that was good, like supporting women’s rights.

  4. dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

    DDay at FDL has got a post up about folks chipping away–already–at the Dodd-Frank financial reform act.

    it looks like Wall Street will get a huge exemption on foreign currency swaps, a gargantuan market that won’t be held to the same exchange-trading rules

    bad news!

  5. paper doll's avatar paper doll says:

    I think the theme generally is Battle Star Galactica between certain factions of the Upper Crust.They came together as one for”Operation Enduring Freedom from Clinton Presidents”…but now I believe we are seeing a failing out. N.Korea, the leaks and these $$ probes….seem like salvos in this civil war between the super duper rich…. imo.

  6. pdgrey's avatar pdgrey says:

    http://susiemadrak.com/?p=10532 Read thru to Howie. What a shitty President.

  7. NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

    Thanks for the heads-up, Dak. I read some of those links and turns out a couple of my accounts are either managed by or have been acquired by a couple of those companies named above. Yikes.

    I think the federal worker wage freeze idea is just more making the small people pay for the rich people’s excesses.

    • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

      I noticed Congress isn’t volunteering for a pay freeze yet and they will vote on this. Coincidence or just a conspiracy theory?

      • dakinikat's avatar dakinikat says:

        sheesh! my odd sense of humor has returned … it must be because wonk’s here and I’m feeling glad!

      • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

        Read somewhere today that they voted to freeze their pay as of sometime in ’09. {{{hunts for link}}}

        But they make around $174,000 a year, so I doubt they’re hurting much.

        • NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

          Congress, not covered by Obama’s new freeze plans as separate branch of government, froze its pay last April, with House and Senate votes to forgo an automatic $1,600 annual cost of living increase.

          House members and senators are paid $174,000 a year. Their last pay increase was $4,700 a year at beginning of 2009. The president’s pay of $400,000 a year was fixed by Congress in January 2001 and has not changed since then.
          ….
          House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio, on track to become House speaker in January, said he was pleased with the president’s announcement. “Republicans and Democrats don’t have to wait until January to cut spending and stop all the tax hikes. We can – and should – start right now,” Boehner said in a statement. He also suggested that Obama was taking a page from the GOP playbook.

          http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2013548287.html

          Yes, Obama is indeed working from a GOP playbook.

    • Rikke's avatar Sima says:

      What we need is a good national strike. I’ll go! I’ll hold people’s picket signs. Heck, I’ll even picket my own business if it’ll help.

  8. NW Luna's avatar NW Luna says:

    Isn’t this just great: s/

    President Barack Obama met Monday with Walmart CEO Mike Duke and Alan Lafley, the former chief executive of Procter & Gamble, continuing his outreach to a business sector that eyes him warily.

    Obama held separate meetings with each executive at the White House.

    The meetings are part of a continuing effort by the president to solicit ideas from some of the nation’s largest employers at it relates to the economic recovery, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said.

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2013548670.html

    We don’t need no stinkin’ ideas from Wal-Mart!

  9. Rikke's avatar Sima says:

    I wish I could figure out a place to put my money that was safe and in no way involved in current financial sector. There’s no place. I hate that I’m forced to ‘buy’ their products despite my will.

    I suppose I could put it in my mattress, but I don’t think the little red dog is going to be that thorough a guard (she’ll probably chew it all), and even only a couple tens of thousands in bills would be bulky and awkward. Not to mention the scrutiny withdrawing such from the usual places would bring from the Feds.