Just Survive …
Posted: October 12, 2008 Filed under: U.S. Economy | Tags: bail out plans, Financial Crisis, presidential election, U.S. Economy 2 CommentsI’ve really wanted to talk about the financial crisis more. It’s been hard to write about because things on the ground are changing so quickly. The deal right now is just to survive the entire thing. Times are odd and the odd are getting odder.
The oddest of the the odds is that there are more than just one economic positions being borrowed from Hillary’s plan by BOTH the surviving presidential contenders. Both of these guys are completely clueless on the economy and it’s really showing. They are like little boys in a class room cheating off that one little girl with glasses that has all the answers.
This week, Senator McCain became the liberal by suggesting a plan similar to Hillary’s suggestion of some kind of HOLC like the one that bought up bad mortgages during the depression. Everything he’s been suggesting is so populist that I keep pinching myself to see if I’m actually awake. The Sunday morning talk shows were filled up with democratic talking heads trying to explain that buying folks’ homes at their underwater positions and renegotiating them is going to help banks more than the home owner. This program is basically a re-tooled Roosevelt New Deal idea that is geared specifically to folks living in their homes, not the speculators. If you were all for the banks, the agency would bail out ALL mortgages, not just firsts for home owners. As a progressive, I have to say, for Democrats to be taking a stand against this position JUST because McCain introduced into the debate and Obama just says no, is a little, well, odd, to me.
Another odder than odd policy suggestion is Obama’s idea to let judges work out families’ mortgage problems in bankruptcy court. This is probably a good long term solution, but wouldn’t it be nice to stop these families from showing up in the bankruptcy court? I’m actually wondering if prevention of a problem is something a lawyer can even wrap their brains around. I mean, they make money from exacerbating problems once they’ve gotten huge in a court case, not from problem prevention so is this why he’s stumping for this at a time when short term solutions are required? Even my first year economic students couldn’t figure out why you’d want to let the bankruptcy court work the foreclosures out. Why not try to prevent the foreclosures?
The next thing is the Pelosi hint at yet another stimulus package. Just about any one ought to realize now that the first one really didn’t do much but hold the recession off a few months and make folks think of other things. While it’s a nice thing to get $600 in the mail, the government can’t control what that money gets spent on. It’s one thing if you take the money and buy something American, but most folks either use it to pay down debt which is not the least bit stimulatory or they go buy something that stimulates the Chinese economy. Unless you create a no buying at Walmart rule, this is nothing but another make them feel better while we figure out what to do plan.
Economists have shown empirically with both the Ford and Bush rebates, that rebates are not the way to stimulate the economy because they don’t have the desired results. They usually just exacerbate the debt and make folks feel a little better. They are not game changers. You need underlying changes to the tax codes to do that or you need the government doing spending on something that might have a chance at creating jobs–like building roads. This is another Obama suggestion. The problem with infrastructure spending at this point is that it takes a long time to get through the system. It is needed, but how long will it take to get the program going? Infrastructure improvements are an important part of both short run economic stimulus and long run economic growth, but it’s a little late to start suggesting these things now that we’re in a full blown financial crisis and down turn in the real economy. They’d have to be coming OUT of the hopper right now to do any real good; not going into the hopper some time ‘soon’. Again, this is a preventative type of action once you see things are slowing down. It wouldn’t be soon enough at this point. This again leads me to believe that Obama doesn’t seem to grok the concept of preventative and when it’s useful. I was suggesting this a YEAR ago as a way of preventing a recession and slowing job loss when it does happen. It’s a little futile now. Hillary was suggesting this a year ago too. That and her green jobs initiative were great suggestions for the situation at that time.
Which brings me to another odder than odd. Senator Obama is now wanting some kind of tax credit to home owners for higher energy costs. What I’m waiting to hear is how this is different from just giving every one a tax holiday from gas taxes except you have to wait until the beginning of the year to file for it. Again, every time you talk about a one time deal, even if it is a tax thing, every one knows it’s a one time deal and it doesn’t really change their behavior. Any stimulus that comes from it tends to be very short-lived. Plus, by the time any tax credits would take effect it will be the spring. Not one economist will probably stick their head out to say what kind of things will be needed by then. It doesn’t make sense to try to do that now.
Right now, Henry Paulson is the most important man in Washington. It’s not the President and it’s not these two candidates. The second most important man is Ben Bernanke. Again, odder than odd because neither of these men are elected and both of these men may have very short tenures at the helm. However, I’m just hoping Dubya takes some time off at the ranch. I know I can’t wish that one for every one up for election right now, but I really would like it. It is in the hands of Paulson and Bernanke until January. I’m okay with that because Paulson, btw, is not what the Republicans or the Democrats spin would make him to be.
Paulson has always been odd for both a Wall Street and Washington insider. Paulson is a man that grew up on a farm in Illinois and got into Dartmouth the old fashioned way–good grades. He wasn’t a legacy of any one unlike our current crop of candidates AND the president. His nickname is “the Hammer” because he’s seen as relentless. He is also a devout Christian Scientist who does not drink or smoke and goes back to Illinois on the weekends. He did this even when he was on Wall Street. He lacks ideology and has been criticized by the right of being selling out free-market principles and on the left for bailing out his Wall Street buddies. I always consider being criticized by both sides a good thing in a public servant, but then that’s me.
Now we seen a joint effort from G-7 countries to contain the contagion. Almost all of these plans have to do some with some kind of nationalization of banks. This includes McCain’s suggestion to get the taxpayer ownership which oddly enough was snuck into the bailout package, unknown to many. I’m wondering where THAT came from. Perhaps we’ll find some one taking the credit for that soon, but it seems it might actually be some one like Republican Senator Arlen Specter. Again, odd, odd and odder.
Meanwhile, my strategy and tactics are just to survive with my job and my loans paid down. I’m also trying to put a little money aside in the bank. I’m trying not to look at my 401k plan because it’s telling me that I will die at the podium at this point. I haven’t changed anything about it except all my new contributions are going into bonds. That’s my suggestion to every one right now, don’t panic, we’ve been here before, we just don’t know how long it’s going to last. I actually do have faith in Paulson and Bernanke but not so much in ANYONE running for election right now. Right now, McCain is sounding like the Roosevelt liberal right now and Obama is sounding very moderate so turning to politics for economics signals right now just has me checking my hands to determine which is left and which is right. I still know which way up and down are and that we’re in for more downs than ups for awhile. Other than that, I have NO idea what to say other than it’s an odd time right now and the odd are just getting odder.
Bottom line: Just try to survive.
Obama the Myth: the Harvard Years
Posted: October 9, 2008 Filed under: No Obama | Tags: No Obama, Obama lies about Harvard Review First, obama shortcomings 10 CommentsSince I’m being hammered from many sides to look at Obama as the superior candidate by some folks, I’ve decided to really take a look long and hard at the resume of Barack Obama. Because they tell me not to rely on the debate performances or his command of facts and issues, I decided to look at him like a job applicant. One of my uncles graduated first in his class at Harvard Law School. Just because I always was enamoured by my Uncle John, I started with the Harvard Law School party of Obama’s resume. This was the FIRST thing I looked into. I found that Obama is a job applicant with a short and padded resume and I got this information with very little time spent googling. The MSM are really a lazy and nefarious bunch.
The first Obama accomplishment we’re presented is the constant repetition of this line that I grabbed from his senate bio.
In 1991, Obama graduated from Harvard Law School where he was the first African American editor of the Harvard Law Review.
That just sounds wonderful doesn’t it? Despite implications by the press and others (I would include his campaign on that), Obama is NOT the first black editor of the Harvard Law Review. He is the THIRD. He also didn’t achieve that position in the historical way which is by merit.
Why hasn’t any one done a little more research in to this? It was completely easy to find that Obama padded his already razor thin resume. Obama, is fact, the third black editor of the Harvard Law Review. Academics get fired for this kind of resume lie. I find it reprehensible that Obama gets away with this on a daily basis.
Not only that, I would think that some one interested in promoting the achievements and history of black Americans would want to clarify this publicly. Any women or minority that achieved this kind of positions prior to efforts by the government to end discrimination is something folks should know about and recognize. Isn’t this the purpose of Women’s History Month and Black History Month? Unfortunately, these two gentlemen have know fallen prey to helping the establishment of Obama, the myth.
I would especially think that Harvard would point out that they’ve had blacks acheive the position prior to Obama. One intrepid journalist asked them to clarify Obama’s resume ‘gaffe’ and published it here.
I wrote that letter to the Dean of the Harvard Law School Oct. 20, 2006. I received the answer in a letter dated Nov. 7, 2006. Dean Elena Kagan thanked me for my letter and said she was pleased to clarify a few points about the Harvard Law Review.
She said, “Members of the Harvard Law Review are referred to as editors. Each year there are many editors, but one person is elected president. The first African-American to serve on the Review was Charles Hamilton Houston, who graduated from Harvard Law School in 1922. The second African-American to gain admission to the Review was William Henry Hastie who earned an LL.B from the Law School in 1930 and an S.J.D. in 1933. Barack Obama was the first African-American president of the Review; he graduated from the Law School in 1991.”
How Obama achieved the status of editor is also an interesting story. As ferreted out by many, and published by few, in 1990, the Harvard Law Review ceased to be a position achieved by merit. The first two black men who achieved their post did so because they placed in the top 10% of their graduating class.
Jack Cashill of the World Net Daily wrote this article in September of 2008. Here’s one of the highlights, although I do suggest you check out his entire column.
To Obama’s good fortune, the HLR had replaced a meritocracy in which editors were elected based on grades– the president being the student with the highest academic rank–with one in which half the editors were chosen through a writing competition.
This competition, the New York Times reported in 1990, was “meant to help insure that minority students became editors of The Law Review.”
It did just that. At the end of his first year, Obama was named along with 40 or so of his classmates an editor of the HLR.
Unlike most editors, and likely all its presidents, Obama was not a writer. During his tenure at Harvard, he wrote only one heavily edited, unsigned note.
NOTE: I know this isn’t the greatest of sources, but the point is that the rules were changed and that mentioned was based on a news article from a legitimate source. I’m not all that interested in Cashill’s opining as I am in why they changed the rules and that they did so RIGHT before Obama’s tenure.
This ‘achievement’ is supposedly Obama’s shining moment. Yet, it appears as much invented and overlooked by the MSM as many of the other things Obama purports and denies. This may serve the interests of Obama and the folks who want him elected at any cost. However, the much needed praise paid to his TWO predecessors remains buried so that Obama the myth, can be elected. Their TRUE achievements remained buried so that a myth can live on.
Protest Voting 101
Posted: October 7, 2008 Filed under: Action Memo, Hillary Clinton: Her Campaign for All of Us, New Orleans, No Obama, PUMA, Women's Rights | Tags: No Obama, Protest vote, PUMA, Sexism 4 CommentsPlayer Queen:
Both here and hence pursue me lasting strife,
If once I be a widow, ever I be a wife!
Player King:
‘Tis deeply sworn. Sweet, leave me here a while,
My spirits grow dull, and fain I would beguile
The tedious day with sleep.Player Queen:
Sleep rock thy brain,
And never come mischance between us twain!Hamlet:
Madam, how like you this play?Queen:
The lady doth protest too much, methinks.Hamlet Act 3, scene 2, 222–230
Puma is a protest movement. Our blogs outline our strategies. Our votes are our tactics. I’m not exactly sure how much clearer I can make this but it appears that we have to repeat these simple facts over and over. If we don’t, no one gets us.
The nature of our protest vote is that is exactly that a PROTEST. This means that our friends who can’t understand why we might vote for a candidate that doesn’t have a chance (McKinney or Nader) or a ticket that we may not agree with on many issues (McCain Palin) don’t understand what a PROTEST vote means. Protests voting means your vote is a protest. It simply doesn’t have to make sense to any one else.
I started thinking about this today due to a post by Masslib on Alegre’s blog and a response by Or what Vahalla said.
The premise of a protest vote is that it’s not issues-related.
What I meant to say, put more succintly 🙂
This also hit me in the face when I saw a response to my own posting “The No NO Sisterhood”. A post by Ben Kilpatrick assumed I voted all women during the democratic run-off in Louisiana just because I was woman who votes for women as a means to discriminate against men.
Just voting for women is the same as just voting for the black guy, or the republican guy, or or or
And it’s about as smart a move as all of those.
My vote was a protest against the treatment of women candidates this year. I did not vote for all women because as a woman, I was voting for ALL women. I voted for all women as a protest. I did not like the way Hillary was treated. I do not like the way Sarah Palin is being treated. I will not stand for Helena Morena being treated similarly either. Already, it is starting. A blog for the local New Orleans business newspaper picked up one quote from my two day postings concerning the second congressional race and all my comments about Ms. Moreno. You can read it here. The only line the blog picked up from me about Helena was that most folks here were calling her the “little white girl in the race” which I view as confusing folks on her mixed white/Latina heritage and belittling her status as a woman by calling her ‘girl’.
I’m still thinking about what kind of protest vote I will make this year when I step in the booth to vote for President. I know I will not vote for Obama. I will not vote for the issues, for once, because I am protesting how he got the nomination, I am protesting how the DNC actively and underhandedly promoted him over a much more qualified and able woman, and how he has been given a HUGE pass by the MSM. I know many of my PUMA friends will vote for McCain Palin, others will just skip the vote, others will still vote for Hillary, and some will vote for third party candidates.
We do not have to explain the ‘logic’ of our vote over and over and over again. It’s not about the issues (like Roe v. Wade), it’s not about the economy, and it’s certainly not about voting party lines. It’s a protest vote. As such, it only has to make sense to us!
I think we need to take some time and rethink why we view our votes as protests this year. This is especially true if you’re thinking of drinking that koolaid and falling prey to the logic of voting on issues at this point. Puma ceases to become a protest movement at that point. It’s effectiveness at supporting reform within the democratic party has no teeth at the point we stop protesting.
There is no such thing for PUMAs as ladies (or gentlemen) protesting too much at this point. Afterall, it is our democracy at stake.
(cross-posted at The Confluence)
Sky Dancing Women on the BBC
Posted: October 6, 2008 Filed under: Human Rights, Women's Rights | Tags: BBC radio, Sarah Palin quotes starbucks cup, Women supporting Women, World Conversation, World Have Your Say Comments Off on Sky Dancing Women on the BBCI was asked today to participate in a BBC radio discussion on women supporting each other. It was today at noon on World Have Your Say. It was an interesting experience. Lots of women from all over the world in many different positions. There was a judge from Pakistan, a health minister from Kenya, and a former MP from Canada. Two of us were academics. I felt like the trapped in the middle American in constrast to am Obamabot from San Francisco and a journalist that was channeling Phyliss Schafly like a good little Stepford Wife. Luckily, some of the Conflucians were blogging on the lunch time thread to buck me up and get me to speak up! Hard to get a word in edgewise but I tried! You can listen at the mp3 download. I don’t come in until 24 minutes into it (if you’re at all interested in that tidbit).
The treatment of Sarah Palin by the media and others basically brought up the subject. 
Here’s the links:
WHYS: Are women their own worst enemy?
Sarah Palin quotes from a Starbucks cup the words of Madeleine Albright, but why should women support each other? Are women themselves the biggest obstacle to gaining equality?
Duration: 50mins | File Size: 23MB
Join the NO NO Sisterhood!
Posted: October 5, 2008 Filed under: Action Memo, New Orleans, PUMA, Women's Rights | Tags: Helena Moreno, New Orleans Congress Race, No NO Sisterhood, Second District Congressional Race in Louisiana, Women Politicians 15 CommentsI voted in the Democratic run-off yesterday in Louisiana. I did something that I haven’t done for a long time. I went down the list of candidates for judgeships and the various other races and voted for all the women. Something tells me I wasn’t alone in this when I heard second congressional district candidate Helena Moreno’s speech after she placed second after $Bill Jefferson and ahead of five well known black male politicians vying for the position. She had a lot of cross-over vote here in a city where the politics of race is pervasive. She’s a latina and has been frequently labelled as “that little white girl” in the race. Her cross-over vote came from black women. This year may yet be known as the REAL year of the woman when a female awakening turns the tide against misogyny and sexism.
Our mantra could be something to the effect of “We’re bitter, we vote, get out of office!”
Helena Moreno has been in New Orleans about 8 years. She quit her job as a news anchor in March to run for office. As a journalist, she was frequently out on the beat looking for corruption and places where things don’t quite work for people. Since this is New Orleans, Moreno never ran out of material. Moreno also lived through Hurricane Katrina and learned its lessons well.
While she does have great name recognition and quite a presence, she is considered the underdog in this race because of the politics of racial identity. That is unless the politics of being a woman in what has arguably been a brutal year for women creates a NO NO sisterhood. That is what I want to see: a movement where all women stand up together and say “NO, he didn’t!” I hope this year we just don’t wag our fingers and speak our indignation then vote for folks who promise to be marginally less worse on the issues we care about. In the No NO Sisterhood, we vote our interests and write checks to support women’s campaigns to ensure our voices our heard and acted on. I’m thinking we should adopt that old women’s fist raised in the symbol of woman with a slight change. The middle finger should be raised to the media and politicians who practice the politics of beating up on women.
During the primary, Moreno had a number of typical dirty tricks pulled on her–including the usual things like hiring Robo phone calls that say you’re from her campaign at all hours and times of day to harass folks and turn them off. She also became the victim of a whisper campaign that went more public. During a televised debate an exchange between Moreno and State Rep. Cedric Richmond turned into a shouting match. Richmond is currently fighting against a suspension of his law license for using a nonprimary residence to run for a city council seat. This exchange happened shortly after Moreno called him out on the pending case. Here’s the script as reported by the Times Picayune.
“Would everyone up here, Miss Moreno specifically, would you be willing to submit to a random drug test?” Richmond asked, noting that many job applicants face such screening…The nasty confrontation ended with Moreno, stung by what she called Richmond’s outrageous “suggestion” that she uses drugs, marching out of WDSU-TV’s downtown New Orleans’ studios and into a nearby clinic, where she voluntarily submitted to a drug test.She quickly delivered the results — a clean reading — to The Times-Picayune.
There’s been a lot of interesting coverage of this race, and as Ms. Moreno takes on $Bill Jefferson, it is bound to get a whole lot more interesting. That is why I am asking you to not only follow what happens, but to help Helena. She’s running in New Orleans and in Louisiana. Politics down here are not only interesting, but can be very brutal.
Here’s her website: Moreno for Congress
Please join me at the NO NO Sisterhood at Act Blue to support Helena Moreno and other fine women candidates.
I think this year has taught us that we cannot rely on many of the current members of the DNC to protect our interests. We need to send some more women to congress, now.
(Cross-posted at the Confluence)







Recent Comments