Wednesday Reads: Are we there yet?


Hey ho, just a couple of more weeks to go…

and now that the swinging dicks of DC have come to the conclusion that their rapey tangerine-tinted fascist is getting his bigly answer coming Nov. 8th…”WRONG” (Tradmark, haha)… it seems they are focusing their eye of Shitfire, I mean Sauron, on Hillary.

A few days ago, this came out of John McCain’s mouth:

An issue that has been mostly absent from this year’s Senate campaigns — the fate of the Supreme Court — suddenly erupted Monday after Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., indicated during a talk-radio appearance that Republicans would move to block any high court nominee made by a President Hillary Clinton should the Democratic nominee win.

McCain made his remarks on WPHT-AM radio in Philadelphia, during an interview in support for fellow Sen. Patrick Toomey, R-Pa.: “I promise you that we will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up,” he said. “I promise you. This is where we need the majority, and Pat Toomey is probably as articulate and effective on the floor of the Senate as anyone I have encountered.”

img_1032Of course, he backed down later in the day…John McCain backs off promise Republicans would block Clinton Supreme Court nominees – Chicago Tribune

The remark immediately raised hackles of Democrats, who have complained about GOP treatment of President Obama‘s judicial nominees — most prominently, Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland, whose nomination has sat in limbo for more than six months after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., resolved to save the pending vacancy for the next president.

McCain’s comments raised the prospect that the vacancy could extend much longer than that, particularly if Republicans maintain their control of the Senate. Even if Democrats win the majority, they would still need a handful of GOP votes to confirm any Supreme Court nominee — current Senate rules require 60 senators to close debate and move to an up-or-down vote.

If Republicans were in fact “united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton . . . would put up,” that could mean the Supreme Court would remain an eight-member body indefinitely — and perhaps force a change to Senate rules allowing for simple-majority confirmation of Supreme Court nominees.

McCain’s office issued a statement Monday afternoon backing off his pledge of blanket opposition.

“Senator McCain believes you can only judge people by their record and Hillary Clinton has a clear record of supporting liberal judicial nominees,” spokeswoman Rachel Dean said. “That being said, Senator McCain will, of course, thoroughly examine the record of any Supreme Court nominee put before the Senate and vote for or against that individual based on their qualifications as he has done throughout his career.”

Y’all must keep in mind this swinging dick is facing some competition in his current run for the senate.

But this notion that the senate will block yet another president from nominating (yeah…not appointing ya Trump bastard) is something that makes me sick…in a pissy sort of way.

I mean like come on…

Wasn’t it enough that the GOP handed Trump his golden ticket as nominee of their fucking fucked up party?

If that wasn’t a pure example of the dysfunctional party’s complete lack of credibility, this latest Freudian slip is just the tip of what could become another political bed of impotent alpha males banging their chest while the people don’t get served.

img_1028Take a look at these words from Evan Culbertson, over at Paste Magazine: John McCain’s Supreme Court Obstructionism is Tantamount to Treason ::: Paste

It was less than two hours after Justice Antonin Scalia’s death was reported in February that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell began his crusade to prevent the appointment of his replacement on the Supreme Court. From the outset, McConnell’s insistence was that the next president—by the will of the American people—would have the privilege of selecting a new ninth Justice. This outstanding vacancy, as well as the potential for several other vacancies to open up over the next few years, has become a major issue in the presidential election. Meanwhile, President Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, has languished in limbo awaiting a confirmation hearing.

This stall tactic was offensive enough, but all of the Senate Republicans’ bluster may have spun into something much more sinister. Last Monday, Senator John McCain made a bold and injurious claim: that the GOP “will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up.” In other words, McCain, McConnell, and Co. have changed their tune—President Obama’s “lame duck” nomination isn’t the problem at all; instead, they refuse to allow any nominee from a Democrat that will, as McCain put it, “change this country for decades.” And with most polls pointing to a likely Clinton presidency, Republicans appear to be scrambling to salvage any party unity they can from the scorched earth Donald Trump is leaving in his wake.


…McCain’s promise that Republicans would indefinitely blockade any SCOTUS nominations made by a President Clinton isn’t just irritating, it’s downright dangerous. If only Republicanpresidents get to select Supreme Court justices, then the implication here, of course, is that a Democratic president is not a legitimate president. And if you’re disquieted by that last sentence, you should be: It challenges the very fundamentals of our democracy.


The fact that McCain (a well-respected 30-year Senator who has formally unendorsed Trump for his behavior) is trying to undermine the authority of the President is far more terrifying. If we take McCain at his word, then the GOP’s new strategy appears to be dismantling the government from the inside out. Much has been made of the Senate’s refusal to hold hearings for Merrick Garland over the past seven months, but now, they’re actively refusing to do their jobs for another four-to-eight years.

As you could probably imagine, this is unprecedented: the longest vacancy in Supreme Court history came during the Tyler and Polk presidencies and lasted 841 days (or a little over two years, from April 1844 to August 1846). The longest in modern history was during the Nixon administration, and lasted “only” 391 days before Harry Blackmun was sworn in. McCain has now promised to leave the seat vacant for at least five years, and possibly longer, depending on the outcome of the 2020 election.

To be perfectly frank about it, this threat is tantamount to treason—Congressional Republicans are refusing to recognize the legitimacy of a democratically-elected President and crippling the effectiveness of the Judicial branch in the bargain. Imagine what could happen if, as many anticipate, two or three additional Justices retire in the next four-to-eight years. There seems to be no valid reason for Republicans to continuously refuse legitimate appointments made by a President Clinton, other than a purely selfish attempt to hold onto some semblance of power. Looking ahead in this scenario, if the Republicans do manage to win the Presidency in 2020 or later… why wouldn’t Democrats return the favor? It’s not that difficult to imagine the left retaliating with similar pettiness, leaving our country in perpetual constitutional crisis. Even if the scenario doesn’t end up being so grave, this effort will only serve to neuter the Supreme Court and diminish its authority, throwing our already-delicate legislative balance of powers into complete disarray.

img_1029All of this doomsday prophesying aside, the fact is that Congress has a constitutional obligation to maintain the Supreme Court, whether they like it or not. If Senate Republicans refuse to do the jobs for which they were elected, then not only are they stalling our nation’s progress—they’re delegitimizing the very Constitution that they’re sworn to uphold.

I can tell you, obstructionism from the GOP is treason in my opinion. That goes back to Grover Norquist (Remember that fuckwad?)… and further still to the meeting the GOP members had while Obama was being sworn in.

Well, fuck them. Those Fuckers!

Yeah, this is a fucking open thread…post whatever the fuck you want!


10 Comments on “Wednesday Reads: Are we there yet?”

  1. Minkoff Minx says:

    Check this out:

    The organization said it happened in

    New Hanover

    Cumberland County elections director Terri Robertson says five people told her machines initially displayed a wrong vote, but all corrected their ballots after reviewing them.

    Voting was changed from Clinton to Trump….

    • Joanelle says:

      maybe we need Dems at each polling place to insure that if changes are made trhey are indeed to the right ballots?

  2. bostonboomer says:

    We will have our revenge, because Democrats are going to be in control of the Senate soon.

    • Minkoff Minx says:

      I hope so. I just got this email:

      PCCC friends,

      Minutes ago, the Associated Press reported, “Cruz suggests leaving vacancy on Supreme Court.”

      Ted Cruz and John McCain may have given away the Republican game plan on the Supreme Court. And we need to treat it like the constitutional crisis it will be if Democrats don’t take back the Senate majority.

      McCain said, “I promise you that we will be united against any Supreme Court nominee that Hillary Clinton, if she were president, would put up.”

      That means the Supreme Court could dwindle to 7, then maybe 6, Justices. It would turn our Justice system and our democracy on its head. The Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves.

      I may be retiring, but I’m not out of the fight.

      Please join me and make an emergency donation to the candidate running to keep my Nevada seat Democratic, Catherine Cortez Masto — and other candidates the PCCC is helping to Take Back The Senate.

      (The PCCC added new Call Out The Vote shifts to voters in my home state of Nevada this Friday and Saturday, and for other key races. See the new shifts here — and do your part by signing up to Call Out The Vote at least once before Election Day.)

      To win the majority, we must keep my seat blue and pick up at least 4 additional seats.

      Catherine Cortez Masto (Nevada) was a wonderful Attorney General for our state. She used her power to fight the big Wall Street banks, along with Senator Elizabeth Warren. Her opponent votes for extreme policies and will vote for Donald Trump.

      Russ Feingold (Wisconsin) is a progressive icon. We miss Russ’s passion and integrity in the Senate. He’s committed to taking on the Koch Brothers and reversing Citizens United. His opponent called Social Security a Ponzi scheme while Russ supports expanding Social Security.

      Tammy Duckworth (Illinois) is a war hero who lost her legs in Iraq. She remains a fighter — actively challenging corporate interests in her campaign. Her opponent votes lockstep with Mitch McConnell’s obstruction.

      Deborah Ross (North Carolina) is someone I relate to because all the pundits thought she couldn’t win — and now her race is neck and neck. A former ACLU director, she’s used to standing on principle and winning upset victories. Her opponent voted to cut Social Security and opposes raising the minimum wage.

      Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire) is a respected governor who supports issues like debt-free college and bold campaign finance reform. Her opponent called Donald Trump a role model. You heard that right.

      Katie McGinty (Pennsylvania) is the favorite in this race, and the Koch Brothers have spent millions against her. Katie says, “We need to strengthen and expand Social Security for our seniors” and Elizabeth Warren is campaigning with her this week. Her opponent, Pat Toomey, literally wrote the book on Social Security privatization and he votes consistently for obstruction.

      PCCC members stepped up to help Take Back The Senate in 2016. Jj, I need you to step up today.

      Democrats likely won’t win the Senate unless we win in Nevada. And these other great candidates are key to taking back the Senate — and restoring sanity to the Supreme Court.

      Please join me and make an emergency donation to these campaigns today. My grandkids and your grandkids will thank you for stepping up when history called.

      (Or sign up to make calls from your home.)

      Thank you.

      Harry Reid

      Want to support the Warren wing? Senator Elizabeth Warren says, “When PCCC members donate millions in small-dollar donations and make millions of phone calls for progressive candidates, leaders in Washington, they take notice.” Chip in $3 here.

      FOLLOW US:
      Follow on Facebook

      Follow on Twitter

      Follow on Instagram

      Subscribe on YouTube

      Paid for by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee PAC ( and not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee. Contributions to the PCCC are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.

      Have you moved? Want to update your email address? Click here.

      You can unsubscribe from this mailing list at any time.

  3. palhart says:

    I hope the electorate is sicken by the GOP “do nothings” and their neo-fascist presidential nominee and will vote the Senate BLUE and Hillary PRESIDENT. I have my sample ballot filled out with my choices and have upped my voting day to this Friday. I still don’t fully understand the Hillary haters even though I grasp misogyny. There never has been a perfect presidential candidate, but, as a youngster, you couldn’t have convinced me that JFK wasn’t.

  4. teele says:

    Donnie done jumped the shark, so that shit show is done. It is time to focus on getting people elected to the legislative houses who will do the jobs they wanted so damn badly. I didn’t realize that the Senate actually has the power to reduce our 3 branches of government down to 2, but apparently the GOP believes the founding fathers they love to expound about were totally mistaken about that whole checks and balances thingie.
    I know most folks here are early voters, but I am set in my ways and want to vote on election day. To any others like me, I urge you to check with your state’s official website regarding rules about poll challengers and poll watchers (in Michigan, they are 2 different things). In light of old r-fer Rogie Stone urging Trumpeteers to pretend they are exit pollers, I suggest having your phone ready to start recording as you leave the polls. I would ask for ID, who they represent, and get photos of them. I really kind of doubt too many will take up the call, because Trumpeteers are basically lazy jerks, but it doesn’t hurt to be prepared.