Aggressive Pro-Life-Until-Birth Crusade Against Women and GirlsPosted: March 11, 2011
In sixth grade I had to write a paper on Home Remedies for my English class taught by Mr. Rotollo. We were sent to interview family members and at the time I had at my disposal many great Aunts…and both grandmothers were alive, so my home remedy report was substantial to say the least. At the time it struck me as odd, every woman family member I talked to had a remedy to bring about abortion. Now, it speaks volumes to me!
These were mostly poor, Catholic women…who would risk their lives with these absurd remedies to end a pregnancy they knew they could not afford to have. One of the remedies was to drink turpentine, straight, in large quantities!
So here are some updates regarding the ongoing assault of women and girls.
The New York Times has issued a response to the disgusting article that we have discussed here on Sky Dancing.
The viral distribution of the story was, at least in part, because of the intense outrage it inspired among readers who thought the piece pilloried the victim.
My assessment is that the outrage is understandable. The story dealt with a hideous crime but addressed concerns about the ruined lives of the perpetrators without acknowledging the obvious: concern for the victim.
While the story appeared to focus on the community’s reaction to the crime, it was not enough to simply report that the community is principally concerned about the boys and men involved – as this story seems to do. If indeed that is the only sentiment to be found in this community – and I find that very hard to believe – it becomes important to report on that as well by seeking out voices of professional authorities or dissenting community members who will at least address, and not ignore, the plight of the young girl involved.
The article goes on to state the obvious issues that we had with the NYT piece.
These elements, creating an impression of concern for the perpetrators and an impression of a provocative victim, led many readers to interpret the subtext of the story to be: she had it coming.
Philip Corbett, standards editor for The Times, told me earlier today that the story focused on the reaction of community residents and that there was no intent to blame the victim. He added, “I do think in retrospect we could have done more to provide more context to make that clear.”
“I do think in retrospect we could have done more to provide more context to make that clear.” Oh…you think you could have done more? These reporters and their editors are pathetic. No apology for the horrible treatment of the NYT article? For shame. The NYT Public Editor goes on to say:
The Associated Press handled the story more deftly, I think. Its piece on the crime also noted the community view that the girl dressed provocatively and even the view of some that the girl may have been culpable somehow. But the AP also quoted someone in the community saying: “She’s 11 years old. It shouldn’t have happened. That’s a child. Somebody should have said, ‘What we are doing is wrong.’”
The Times, I have been told, is working on a followup story. I hope it delves more deeply into the subject because the March 8 story lacked a critical balancing element. If upon further reporting it is found that the community of Cleveland, Tex., universally believes that the 11-year-old girl was culpable in this crime, then that would be remarkable indeed. But if it proved to be the case, The Times should take care to interview mental health and legal experts who can provide context to a story about a vicious sex crime against a young girl.
I still think this is a sorry ass response to the story by James C. McKinley Jr. He should be fired. There is no excuse for his disgusting portrayal and utter disregard for the victim of this horrible crime.
In my home state of Georgia, the assault against women has been in high gear for years. Y’all know about the “Life Amendment” and Miscarriage is Murder items that have been proposed by State Legislators. I wrote my representative about these, and he did respond. More on that later….
In the Georgia Senate two new bills were introduced that can be described as disturbing, as follows:
Sen. Barry Loudermilk, R-Cassville, introduced Senate Bill 209 March 3, which would ban abortions after 20 weeks. But as the Senate Rules Committee met to consider it this afternoon a new version was handed out that says abortions could be performed only in hospitals licensed to do so.
Senate Bill 210, which says that any doctor who performs an abortion that has not followed a series of state stipulated actions, such as notifying parents of a minor getting an abortion or performing an ultrasound for the women, can be sued for wrongful death.
According to MS. Magazine:
Janelle Yamarick, community services director at the Feminist Women’s Health Center of DeKalb County, GA, pointed out that 95 percent of abortions are performed in private doctors’ offices, licensed surgical centers, and clinics. Yamarick clarified, “To put it in a nutshell abortions would be legal in Georgia, you just couldn’t get one.”
More on this from Care2.org: Georgia to Essentially Eliminate Abortion
It looks like the Rules Committee has tabled Bill 209, but Senate Bill 210 is still very much on the menu, and looks like it will pass with no problems. Push to limit abortions in Ga. stalls after change
Senate Rules Committee chairman Don Balfour, R-Snellville, said after a committee meeting that he decided to table a Senate bill because of concerns about changes to the bill that would effectively shut down abortion clinics in the state.
“We were moving too fast on an idea that we need more time to think about and consider,” Balfour said.
From the Atlanta Journal Constitution: Senate panel blocks bill to ban abortion clinics from Georgia | ajc.com
Senate Bill 209 was tabled by the Rules Committee after more than two days of often-heated debate. Tabling it at this point in the session makes it extremely unlikely it would reach the full Senate this year.
A separate abortion bill, Senate Bill 210, could still advance. The Senate Rules Committee could decide Friday afternoon to send it to the full Senate on Monday. That bill says any doctor who performs an abortion that has not followed a series of state-stipulated actions, such as notifying parents of a minor getting an abortion or performing an ultrasound for the women, can be sued for wrongful death.
Imagine, being sued and charged with wrongful death? The fact that these bills are even being proposed should be enough for the Democratic Party to get their act together and stand up to these PLUBs.
A few other recent articles of interest:
The video on this link is difficult to watch: ThinkProgress » Woman Forced To Watch Her Baby Die Because Nebraska Anti-Abortion Law Prohibited Doctor From Acting
….because of Nebraska’s law prohibiting any abortion after 20 weeks, the doctor could not assist or he would “face criminal charges, jail time, and lose his medical license.” Her doctors told her “she’d just have to wait.” So she did, in “torture,” and gave birth to Elizabeth at 3pm, watched her gasp for breath, and then watched her die at 3:15pm on December 8, 2010. “The outcome of my pregnancy, that choice was made by God,” said Deaver, but “how to handle the end of my pregnancy, that choice should’ve been mine.”
She is right, the choice should have been hers!
Health Commissioner Karen Remley told the board’s 14 members (a 15th seat is currently vacant) at their quarterly meeting in Richmond that a law adopted by the General Assembly last month requires that rules be written no more than 280 days after Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) signs the bill into law. He has until March 29 to do so and has said he supports the measure.
Remley said that timeframe triggers the state’s emergency regulatory process — rather than a more plodding standard process that typically takes more than two years.
The emergency rule writing process significantly expands the power of the health department and gubernatorial staff in writing the regulations.
It means the Board of Health — which at present includes eight members appointed by Democratic Gov. Tim Kaine (D) — has just one opportunity to formally weigh in before rules go into place. It will occur Sept. 15, when the group reviews, amends and ultimately votes on a draft of new rules written by staff members.
Public comment also is more limited during the emergency phase — rather than offering written comments, the public will have one opportunity to speak to the Board of Health. It will take place on Sept. 15, the same day the board will take action.
So, these PLUBs will speed this through the process and in return leave women, mostly the poorer ones, out looking for a clinic that actually “passes” these new rules.
“This is going to happen so very fast,” said Paulette McElwain, President and CEO of the Virginia Leauge for Planned Parenthood. “There’s very little we can do.”
I think that the party usually thought of as protecting the rights of people, women and poor women…the Democrats…have let us down completely. No surprise with all the other stuff they are letting happen.
We all know the war against women has been in full swing for a while now, as this article by Armella Gottschalk, sociology senior, points out: OUDaily.com | COLUMN: Senate vote denies women’s rights
I, as a woman, do not support the Pence Amendment. The recent abortion laws in Oklahoma were enough of a slap to the state’s women that the federal government does not need to intervene and revoke even more resources that were once available to us.
In the House of Representatives, there are 360 men and 75 women; in the Senate, 83 men and 17 women. This law was created by a man, and has been voted in by a predominantly male body.
I, as does every woman in this nation, wonder: why do men hold the power to dictate what rights we [women] have to our bodies, when men will never understand what it’s like to be a woman?
Since when do men know what’s best for women’s rights and bodies, better than women? Never.
I wholeheartedly disagree with this course of action taken by the House of Representatives. Whether pro-abortion rights or anti-abortion, we need to recognize that Title X was not funding abortions but contraception, tests and screenings for diseases as well as teaching preventative methods for pregnancy and diseases.
What’s so horrendous about that?
She is right, nothing horrendous in that.
In an op-ed by Gina Burell, published on the St. Augustine.com site: Letter: Stop lawmakers from denying women’s health rights | StAugustine.com
Editor: The Right Wing/Tea Party Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives are waging an attack on women’s health and reproductive rights this instant. They want to deny millions of women access to contraception, life-saving screening for cancer and cut nutritional help for millions of newborn babies.
This is just the beginning.
The budget bill that passed the U.S. House on Jan. 26, 2011, included defunding Planned Parenthood. This was an amendment by a Republican male from Indiana. A recent sting operation on a Planned Parenthood clinic by an anti-abortion group uncovered an errant employee who was immediately fired.
This is no reason to cut off funds to all Planned Parenthood clinics throughout the U.S. They do not use federal funds for abortion services. They serve one in five American women some time in their lives.
The terrible cuts in the U.S. House resolution includes the elimination of support for Title X, which is the family planning program for low-income women. This program provides birth control, breast and cervical cancer screening, and testing for HIV and STDs. In the absence of Title X, many women will die.
Another bill offered by a Republican male in the U.S. House will allow hospitals receiving federal funds to refuse to end a pregnancy, even to save a woman’s life. The Right-Wing Republicans also want to cut 10 percent from the successful Women’s Infant Children Program (WIC), which serves 9.6 million low-income women.
Well, I have to say I did write to my representative Stephen Allison, about my disgust at Georgia’s proposed legislation to make miscarriage murder….I also questioned his support for the proposed amendment to the Georgia Constitution that makes “life” and personhood at the moment of fertilization.
This was the answer I got…which does not offer me any kind of encouragement that these PLUBs will stop the crusade against women and girls…he also spelled my name wrong.
Representative Franklin introduces this bill every year and it never makes it out of committee and onto the floor. This bill posses no threat. I am Pro-life, but I also understand that certain medical circumstances do occur. These circumstances are unfortunate and I would never condemn a woman for receiving necessary treatment that protects her life. I assure you that this bill will not pass! I am very sorry that you have suffered these two tragic events. Please understand that any representative may draft a bill that can say anything. However, many of these nonsensical bills will fail to make it out of the committee process and be voted on by the legislature. I appreciate your message and would love to hear your concerns on any other bills.
So, I guess it is just part of the game, to take up time and effort and taxpayer money to bring these “nonsensical” bills to the floor? This response is wrong…there is no excuse, none whatsoever, to dismiss the lawmakers repeated attempts against the constitutional rights of women. It is as simple as that.