Wednesday Reads: V-Jay D-Day? Nope, Texas’ Vaginas Get Six Week Reprieve

Child's book about rain...see the little rain drops in the clouds? I just had to put up a happy picture.

Good Morning

We had a live blog going last night:

Evening at the Circus: Deep South and Fancy Free! « Sky Dancing

You can catch up with the Clown Show at that link.  If you are not in the mood for a bit of humor, redneck style, then by all means…

NBC Politics – Santorum wins Mississippi and Alabama primaries

Republican Santorum scores crucial Deep South wins | Reuters

Santorum Wins Alabama and Mississippi Primaries – NYTimes.com

Romney wins Hawaii GOP presidential caucuses

Romney wins caucuses in Hawaii, American Samoa – The Washington Post

Born-again Christians dominate GOP vote in AL, MS – Yahoo! News

Alabama and Mississippi Deal Blow to Gingrich – NYTimes.com

Boy, I tell yew what…that thar Sanitorum shore is a Dick….God Bless Him. (Read the post last night to get the joke.)

Since we write the morning reads the night before, I have no idea about the results of the Hawaiian or American Samoan primaries, I will update the post with those numbers in the comments.

Let’s move on with updates on the GOP’s War on Women. Today was the day that Texas Planned Parenthood would be closing their doors due to an asshole’s  Governor’s decision to defund the program because..you know…it helps women take care of themselves. Planned Parenthood Prepares To Turn-Away State-Funded Patients

Planned Parenthood clinics across the state have a little more time before the must turn-away patients in the state’s Women’s Health Program. KERA’s BJ Austin says funding was to be cut Wednesday, but new regulations issued over the weekend allow patients to be seen through April 30th.

According to the article, Planned Parenthood provides basic healthcare, contraception and mammograms for 40% of all women in Texas.

At Planned Parenthood of North Texas, Kelly Hart says even with the extra time this situation is distressing for thousands of Women’s Health Care Program patients.

Hart: I’m hearing more and more stories from our health center managers and the nurses about these patients which just don’t have any idea what they’re going to do.  And it is heartbreaking.

A law professor at University of Georgia wrote an op/ed about all this women stuff.  Eric Segall: The Hypocrisy of the Abortion Debate: Why Conservatives Should Vote Pro-Choice and Leave Planned Parenthood Alone

Over the last two months, Republican politicians in Congress and across the nation have launched a complete assault on women’s health generally and a woman’s right to choose to have an abortion specifically. Last Thursday (on International Women’s day no less), Congress debated a completely unnecessary (and potentially harmful) law making it a federal crime for anyone but a parent to accompany a young woman across state lines to seek an abortion, even where the parents are absent or abusive. All over the country, states are enacting anti-abortion laws at record levels designed to deter women from exercising their constitutional right to choose.

As part of this overall effort to prevent women from having abortions, Republicans are also attacking Planned Parenthood on almost a daily basis. Texas recently decided to forego significant federal money to be used to provide health care (not abortions) to poor women solely because of Texas’ desire to strip Planned Parenthood of all financial support within the state. The United States government was almost shut down recently because of Republican hostility to the work of Planned Parenthood (most of which, of course, has nothing to do with abortion). Virtually all of these attacks on the right to choose have been brought by members of the Republican Party who would self-identify themselves as conservatives.

There are many public policy arguments supporting the right of women to control their own reproductive destinies. This essay, however, is only concerned with the one argument that should in a sane world appeal to the very people who are trying so hard to interfere with that right.

(Raises hand.) I have a question, if you are dealing with these fetus fanatics who want to send women back to the days of chastity belts, how can you even begin to expect to have a “sane” argument.

The four men currently running for the republican nomination for president stress individual freedom and governmental non-interference with important decisions as the most important American values. Because they cannot argue with the fact that approximately half our society feels the right to terminate a pregnancy is such an important freedom, on what basis do they support the government’s right to take that liberty away or make it much more difficult to exercise?

The answer, of course, is that these four candidates and other anti-abortion advocates would argue that fetuses are innocent victims who cannot take care of themselves and thus need governmental protection from would-be killers. But, as previously noted, there is significant disagreement in our culture on this question. In totalitarian states, government officials could simply say we know better and we get to choose. In America, however, especially in the eyes of conservatives and libertarians, it is not the government’s job to resolve through coercion and duress issues of freedom that so many in our population view as fundamentally important to living the good life. The argument “we know better,” when there is such disagreement, simply should not be available to people who consistently voice skepticism of intrusive government.

Anti-choice politicians and pundits can scream as loudly, intensely, and as often as they like that abortion is murder but that does not make it so. Many Americans believe the right to abortion is just as important as the right to free speech, the right to practice religion, and the right to vote. In light of that undeniable reality, those in favor of private decision-making and personal freedom should vote pro-choice every time (and not use governmental force to punish an organization so vital to women’s health just because it provides some abortion services). That conservative politicians and pundits often argue and vote otherwise demonstrates the great hypocrisy of the abortion debate and strongly suggests that anti-choice republicans and conservatives only believe in small government and personal liberty when it is their personal, subjective, and contestable views of freedom that get to carry the day.

This next story is one that is so upsetting, I could not write about it yesterday when I read it. Unarmed Black Teen Killed By White Neighborhood Watch Leader

Unarmed Black Teen Killed By White Neighborhood Watch Leader

This is such a sad story: the senseless murder of a high school junior in Florida.

On the evening of February 26, Trayvon Martin, 17, of Miami, FL, was visiting his father in a gated community near Orlando, FL, when he left during halftime of the NBA All-Star Game to get a bag of Skittles for his younger brother.

When Martin returned into the community, with the candy and a soda, Neighborhood Watch captain George Zimmerman, 28, began to trail him.

[…]

When police arrived, they found Martin dead. According to Zimmerman, the shooting was in self-defense, even though the teen was unarmed.

Yet even though it’s clear that he shot the unarmed black boy, Zimmerman, who is white, has not been arrested or charged in the death of Martin.

From Loop21:

The family of the dead teenager is outraged and are demanding that tapes from 911 calls made by neighbors be released to help piece together what happened before, during and after the incident.

“I’m looking for justice for my family,” says Tracy Martin, Trayvon’s father. “I want answers but I don’t have any to give, not for his mother, his brothers or sisters. We don’t have nothing, but we want answers.”

Neighbors are just as upset that no arrests have been made. Police are saying they need time to conduct a proper and “fair” investigation.

You can watch interviews with Martin’s family here.

And Zimmerman is still free…no arrest, no charges.
Here is another link, the video is something you need to see. Neighborhood Watch Shooting of Trayvon Martin: Probe Reveals ‘Questionable Police Conduct’ – ABC News

ABC News has uncovered questionable police conduct in the investigation of the fatal shooting of an unarmed black teenager by a white neighborhood watch captain in Florida, including the alleged “correction” of at least one eyewitness’ account.

Sanford Police Chief Billy Lee said there is no evidence to dispute self-appointed neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman’s assertion that he shot 17-year-old Trayvon Martin out of self-defense.

“Until we can establish probable cause to dispute that, we don’t have the grounds to arrest him,” Lee said.

Martin had been staying at his father’s girlfriend’s house during the night of the NBA All-Star game Feb. 26.

The teenager went out to get some Skittles and a can of ice tea. On his way back into the gated suburban Orlando community, Martin, wearing a hood, was spotted by Zimmerman, 28.

According to law enforcement sources who heard Zimmerman’s call to a non-emergency police number, he told a dispatcher “these a..holes always get away.”

Zimmerman described Martin as suspicious because he was wearing a hooded sweatshirt and walking slowly in the rain, police later told residents at a town hall.

A dispatcher told him to wait for a police cruiser, and not leave his vehicle.

So Zimmerman killed an unarmed teen, an unarmed black teen.

Trayvon Martin: Sorry, The First Murder Is Free Of Charge | Addicting Info

As he’s walking home, a car starts following him. The man driving the car is watching him. Trayvon finally turns and says, “What’s your problem?” The problem is he “walks in a suspicious way” – and the guy in the car is a 26 year old neighborhood watch captain who has been stalking him from the convenience store. When Trayvon confronts him, the man gets out of his vehicle and they get into some kind of shoving match. The shoving match ends with the unarmed teenager dead on the ground within sight of his dad’s front yard.

No Charges Against Zimmerman

The details are sketchy as to why, but for some reason Mr. Zimmerman decided earlier that Trayvon was walking suspiciously. I’m not sure what that means but I’m sure it has more to do with the tone of his skin than the movement of his feet. Mr. Zimmerman calls the police to alert them. They tell him to stop pursuing the individual, that they are dispatching a car. Mr. Zimmerman disregards that direction and keeps on tracking Trayvon as he walks “suspiciously” home with his little brother’s candy.

Before the police arrive, they get two more 911 calls about the scuffle. By the time they get there Trayvon is dead and Zimmerman has a bloody nose and a 9mm in his waistband. He claims to have killed the boy in self-defense. On what planet – Bubbaville?

Mr. Zimmerman had absolutely no authority to stalk Trayvon, no authority to confront him on the street and absolutely no authority to shoot him when the kid had the audacity to challenge being followed.

Bill Lee, Chief of Police in Bubbaville

Interestingly enough, the Sanford police saw no reason to arrest Zimmerman, who admitted he just gunned down an unarmed kid on the street walking home from a convenience store. Evidently Mr. Zimmerman is well-respected, has a background in criminal justice. Says Chief  Lee,”It’s not like he went out there looking to shoot somebody.”

HELLOOOOO! He did shoot somebody.

According to the Huffington Post, Trayvon’s dad, Tracey Martin asked the police why Zimmerman hadn’t been arrested. He says the officers told him “they respected [Zimmerman's] background, that he studied criminal justice for four years and that he was squeaky clean.”

“My question to them was, did they run my child’s background check? They said yes. I asked them what they came up with, and they said nothing. So I asked if Zimmerman having a clean record, did that give him the right to shoot and kill an unarmed kid?”

Evidently so.

The police have questioned Zimmerman twice in the two weeks since Trayvon’s murder, but no charges have been filed. The most recent update from Chief Lee is that there is insufficient evidence to arrest Mr. Zimmerman. After all, he had a bloody nose and grass stains on his shirt.

What Zimmerman must have endured from that young kid he stalked and then murdered? I’m sure Tide will get out the stains out of his shirt, but he sure as hell can’t get the blood off his hands.

If this was episode of Criminal Minds, Mr. Zimmerman would fit the profile of a budding serial killer. You know, the kind that has a hero complex, pretends to be a cop, practices pulling his gun at home in front of the mirror? Who better to take out than a kid Walking While Black.

Trymaine Lee of the Huffington Post has a series of very good articles that you should read. Trayvon Martin

This is a link to Lee’s latest article: Trayvon Martin Case Sent To State Attorney’s Office Amid Growing Tension, Questions About Police Probe

More from a local Orlando news station: Family wants 911 calls released in teen’s fatal shooting

A controversial 911 call is now the focus in the case of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch captain.

Martin’s family attorney says that recording will clear up what she believes really happened.

“I think we’re going to hear that this was not a case of self-defense,” says Natalie Jackson. “This is a case of Geroge Zimmerman stalking Trayvon Martin.”

The shooting happened All-Star Weekend at the Twin Lakes gated community in Sanford. Police say 28-year-old George Zimmerman was patrolling the neighborhood when he spotted Martin. Zimmerman called 911 asking for backup, because he believed Martin appeared suspicious.

So far, the 911 recordings haven’t been publicly released. However, Jackson says she has numerous tips from people claiming to have ties to the Sanford Police Department. Those people say they know what’s on the tapes.

There is speculation and Jackson says she has been told from people who have heard the tapes, there is incriminating evidence regarding racist remarks from Zimmerman.

Sanford Police have not recommended criminal charges against Zimmerman, saying right now there is not enough evidence. News 13 asked a department spokesperson to comment on Jackson’s statement regarding the 911 calls, but he declined.

We also attempted to contact George Zimmerman for a comment but were unable to reach him.

Nevertheless, Jackson believes the evidence is in the 911 calls.

“I think the 911 calls will shed light on the fact that George Zimmerman was asked to stay in his car,” Jackson said. “He disregarded that and in two minutes Trayvon was dead.”

Although Sanford Police are finished with their investigation they still will not release the tapes or say what is on them.

Jackson has filed court documents seeking the 911 tapes and expects the judge to rule later this week.

From the Addicting Info link:

The Sandford Police turn the case over to the Seminole County DA on Tuesday, saying they have no grounds for arrest. The DA’s number is 407-665-6000. But maybe it’s time to bring this back from Planet Bubbaville and into the US Justice System. You can contact the US Attorney’s office for Orlando at 407-648-7500.

This is such a disturbing and sad story. I really can’t say anything about it.

We lived in Orlando for about 6 years, my cousin still lives in Winter Park….We used to talk about Sanford being a hotbed of racism. The killing, claim of self-defense, and lack of charges are unreal, like something out of the civil rights era.

Let’s end the post with some lighter news…okay?

Encyclopaedia Britannica Drops Print Edition

After 244 years, the Encyclopaedia Britannica will cease publishing its flagship encyclopedia and concentrate on its digital offerings.

You know, there is something satisfying in doing research with actual books and papers. You don’t get the same “yessss, eureka I found it” feeling when you use Google. It is like taking the easy way out. (If that makes any sense.)

Scenic Greek Island Shows Signs of Volcanic Unrest–  Okay, so this may not be a “good” thing, but it is very interesting to say the least.

The volcanic caldera on the picturesque tourist island of Santorini is showing signs of unrest. But researchers detecting the caldera’s movement say it doesn’t necessarily mean an eruption is imminent.

The Greek island was the site of one of the most massive volcanic eruptions in history 3,600 years ago. That eruption, which created tsunamis 40 feet (12 meters) tall, may have spawned the legend of the lost city of Atlantis. The volcano last erupted in 1950, albeit on a much smaller scale.

[…]

If a Santorini eruption did occur, Newman said, it would be nothing like the Minoan eruption of 1650 B.C. that birthed the myth of Atlantis. That eruption was a once-in-100,000-year event, and the expansion of the magma chamber happening now is only 1 percent of what would have gone on prior to the ancient blast. [The 10 Biggest Eruptions in History]

Geophysicists are keeping an eye on the caldera, however. An eruption could generate local tsunamis within the Santorini archipelago, Newman said, damaging ports and disrupting ship traffic. Even if the volcano doesn’t erupt, the shifting caldera could increase earthquake risk, and the island cliffs are vulnerable.

One more, The Woman Who Skied Antarctica Solo.

The meteorologist-turned-adventurer Felicity Aston has had a soft spot for Antarctica ever since she learned of the ill-fated British explorer Robert Falcon Scott, who loomed as large for her growing up, she says, as characters like King Arthur and Robin Hood. But unlike most of us, Aston never abandoned her dream of emulating her childhood hero. In January the 34-year-old became the first woman to cross Antarctica alone and the first human to traverse the 1,084 mile-long continent without dogs or snowmobiles—although, because she had two food drop-offs, Guinness World Records won’t credit her for a solo crossing.

In any case, the trek took her 59 days of pulling two sledges behind her on skis, securing her tent against ferocious windstorms, navigating glaciers, and rationing a small tub of peanut butter—her only luxury. In the process, she fell even more in love with “that white place at the bottom of the globe.” I spoke with Aston last month, two weeks after her return from the Hercules Inlet, where her journey ended.

Read the interview at the link above.

That is it for me, what do you all think about the killing in Orlando? (Well, Sanford Florida.) And what kind of news stories are you reading about today?

*Correction, Texas Vaginas will get six week reprieve…I had a “slight” miscalculation with the dates. When I wrote this post late last night I transposed the date Texas Planned Parenthood will close, thinking the date was April 3rd and not April 30th. I have changed the title of the post to reflect this correction.


26 Comments on “Wednesday Reads: V-Jay D-Day? Nope, Texas’ Vaginas Get Six Week Reprieve”

  1. Minkoff Minx says:

    Election 2012 – Live Election Results for Hawaii – CBS News

    Romney wins Hawaii

    45 of 45 Precincts Reporting | ★ = Projected Winner | Delegates = Estimated Delegate Count
    Candidates Vote % Votes Delegates

    Mitt
    Romney
    45% 4,250 ★

    Rick
    Santorum
    25% 2,369

    Ron
    Paul
    18% 1,712

    Newt
    Gingrich
    11% 1,034

    Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/primary-election-results-2012/state.shtml?state=HI#ixzz1p5ZNTzGD

  2. Minkoff Minx says:

    I just saw this in my MoJo RSS feed: Mitt Romney Reviews the Olive Garden in Grand Forks, North Dakota | Mother Jones

    I have to post this because it is…well, you’ll see.

    Last Thursday, the Internet was thrown into chaos by the discovery that 85-year-old North Dakota resident Marilyn Haggerty had written a 485-word review of the Olive Garden for her hometown paper, the Grand Forks Herald. “The place is impressive,” Haggerty wrote. “It’s fashioned in Tuscan farmhouse style with a welcoming entryway.”

    What the Internet didn’t know is that Marilyn Hagerty isn’t the only senior citizen to write a review of the new Olive Garden in Grand Forks, North Dakota. Mother Jones has obtained an exclusive copy of an unpublished manuscript written by Willard Mitt Romney of Belmont, Massachusetts; Wolfeboro, New Hampshire; and La Jolla, California. A notoriously picky eater, Mr. Romney’s culinary adventures have gripped the nation during his presidential campaign, as pundits have puzzled over his refusal to eat the skin on fried chicken, and his love–hate relationship with catfish.

    We’ve reproduced the review in its entirety:

    Olive Garden is Great

    By Mitt Romney

    Let me tell you, this place is great. Is this where you folks normally eat? Only when you’re broke, that’s right. Heh.

    Ann and I sat in a booth near the kitchen. There was a fireplace, a real old-fashioned hearth, in the corner, and a nice vase on the ledge. I love décor; napkins are great. The ice water was just the right temperature.

    Funny huh? But when you have actual stories like these:

    Huckabee challenges Romney over fried chicken

    Mitt Romney Flip Flops On Catfish

    This Olive Garden review is not too far off the mark.

    • Minkoff Minx says:

      From the FDL Link: David Dayen

      There’s a discrepancy between the numbers initially contemplated to be delivered to the states and the eventual numbers in the settlement documents. Simply put, all of the numbers in the settlement documents are slightly lower. For example, the spreadsheet showing very specific settlement numbers released on February 9 shows that Alabama would receive $26,474,753. In reality, in the settlement documents, Alabama will receive $25,305,692. New Jersey’s haul from the February 9 spreadsheet? $75,520,276. Their actual total? $72,110,727. The reductions range from $100,000 (in the case of Wyoming) to $20 million (in the case of California). I didn’t do a full tally of the total reduction, but my back-of-the-envelope guess would be over $100 million.

      What accounts for this? Probably this little nugget buried in a Reuters article on the settlement:

      Some banks negotiated separate requirements.

      Ally Financial, for example, negotiated a steep discount on the fine part of its settlement, based on an inability to pay it, according to people familiar with the matter.

      It was expected to pay some $250 million, but the Justice Department cut it to around $110 million, these people said.

      In exchange, it committed to solicit all borrowers in its own loan portfolios and to offer to cut principal for delinquent borrowers down to 105 percent of the home’s value. It also offered to refinance underwater borrowers who are current on their payments.

      Gee, I didn’t know that federal and state civil penalties had a “pay what you can” quality to them.

      This matches up pretty well with the reduction in fines for the states. And let’s be clear: those fines, and the fines to the federal government, are the only hard dollars in the settlement deal. The rest is air, money in “credits” to go toward principal reductions, short sales, refinancing, and as we learn in the documents a variety of other possibilities, many of which the banks habitually do anyway. So now we’re moving away from the banks paying penalties up front and toward the banks getting credit for their current practices over a period of a number of years. And in Ally’s case, I think we should be more than a little shocked that an established bank could not pay a $250 million fine.

  3. So glad you had a caption on the picture – I thought those were sperm hovering over the landscape!

    I’ve been wondering what percentage of registered voters are evangelicals. I couldn’t find the info in a quick search, but found 2 related articles. I don’t remember whether either of these have been posted in previous posts or not. I remember hearing the NPR story. Just in case, here they are:
    http://jezebel.com/5888860/the-evangelicals-sad-attempt-to-convert-the-christian-masses-into-registered-voters
    http://www.npr.org/2012/02/27/147504999/to-get-out-the-vote-evangelicals-try-data-mining

    Living in Orlando, the story of the killing of Trayvon has been all over the news. It’s a tragedy & with all the coverage it’s somewhat hopeful that it won’t get swept under the rug.

    NPR did a couple of interviews with Ashton during & after she completed her journey. It was another “Why?” story for me. I don’t understand why people climb mountains either. Guess it’s because I often have trouble staying upright on level ground with the only hazards I face are cats winding around my legs, or sleeping dogs in my path.

    I’m a big fan of the Pew Research Center. Here are a couple of recent polls:
    http://www.people-press.org/2012/02/27/public-views-of-the-divide-between-religion-and-politics/

    http://www.people-press.org/2012/03/05/gop-race-is-rallying-democrats/

    Thanks for a great post, Minx.

  4. One final thought: did anyone see the sign behind Newter last night? It said, “Don’t Believe the Liberal Media.” I found that chilling. It’s no wonder no one on the Repugnant/Christofascist side of the great divide knows any actual facts. Climate change, Keystone XL, gov’t spending down during Obama’s presidency, wealth disparity, evolution, and so on and so on. The Right’s motto seems to be, “I learned everything I need to know from reading The Bible and listening to Fox News shows.”

    • ralphb says:

      The right’s whole deal seems to be they learned everything they need to know in Sunday school and nothing else matters. Facts are mutable depending on what you believe. It’s incredibly sick and terminally ignorant.

    • ralphb says:

      How much do voters know?

      “The first lesson you learn as a pollster is that people are stupid,” said Tom Jensen of Public Policy Polling, a Democratic polling firm. “I tell a client trying to make sense of numbers on a poll that are inherently contradictory that at least once a week.”

      Jensen, a Democrat, pointed to surveys showing that voters embraced individual elements of the Affordable Care Act, while rejecting the overall law, as an example of the political schizophrenia or simple ignorance that pollsters and politicians must contend with.

      “We’re seeing that kind of thing more and more. I think it’s a function of increased political polarization and voters just digging in their heels and refusing to consider the opposing facts once they’ve formed an opinion about something,” said Jensen, who has generated eye-catching data showing many GOP primary voters still question the president’s religion and nationality. “I also think voters are showing a tendency to turn issues that should be factual or non-factual into opinions. If you show a Tennessee birther Obama’s birth certificate, they’re just going to say ‘well in my opinion he’s not a real American.’ It’s not about the birth certificate; it’s about expressing hatred for Obama in any form they can.”

  5. Pat Johnson says:

    America has a chance at another “historic” election in 2012.

    A race between the first Mormon president, the first provisional pope, or a thrice married scandal fueled speaker of the House. (I don’t include Ron Paul since he is nothing but a blip on the radar and has about as much chance to win as I do.)

    Newt’s on the ropes but a Saintorum/Romney match up should prove interesting. They could “debate” whose religion is more acceptable, whose moral path is more suitable, and who would more effectively harness women and how quickly when they reach office.

    The whole thing is a travesty.

  6. ralphb says:

    Cecile Richards and PP has been on a 16 city bus tour against the cuts in women’s health funding. Here’s a story about the last stop in Austin yesterday from a local TV station.

    http://www.kvue.com/news/New-state-law-reduces-available-women-142600946.html

  7. ralphb says:

    Republicans Losing on Birth Control as 77% in Poll Spurn Debate

    Americans overwhelmingly regard the debate over President Barack Obama’s policy on employer-provided contraceptive coverage as a matter of women’s health, not religious freedom, rejecting Republicans’ rationale for opposing the rule. More than three-quarters say the topic shouldn’t even be a part of the U.S. political debate.
    [...]
    The results suggest the Republican candidates’ focus on contraception is out of sync with the U.S. public. Seventy-seven percent of poll respondents say birth control shouldn’t be a topic of the political debate, while 20 percent say it should.

    “These candidates are talking to a relatively small subset even among Republicans,” said J. Ann Selzer, of Des Moines, Iowa-based Selzer & Co., who conducted the telephone poll of 1,002 respondents. “They may have the feeling, and their polls may be showing them, that this is a way in and this is a wedge issue within the party, but this does not dovetail with the views of the majority in the U.S.”

  8. ralphb says:

    Colbert asks where Romney’s dog would go if his car had a windmill

    Bored with President Barack Obama’s energy policy, Stephen Colbert spent Monday evening championing the GOP presidential candidates for being “plain spoken” folks when it comes to science.

    The Comedy Central personality had an animated one-sided discussion about Rick Santorum’s latest dismissal of climate change with his house plant Robert, who supports Obama.

    Colbert then proceeded to analyze Mitt Romney’s attack on Obama’s energy policy, agreeing with the former Massachusetts governor saying, “You can’t drive a car with a windmill on it.”

    That’s right, you can’t drive a car with a windmill on it,” Colbert said. “Because if you put a windmill on top of your car, where does the dog go?”

    • Woman Voter says:

      They were perfectly fine when Bill Maher was talking about Hillary’s ‘C’ and calling Sarah Palin a ‘C’ and a couple of other things too…why so shy now? They never reprimanded their staff for pretending to grab Hillary’s breast on a life size cut out, but now they are SHY!?!

      They fostered the environment and they supported President Obama Stupak Executive Order…there has been no talk of repealing that.

  9. Minkoff Minx says:

    Did y’all see Dowd today? I really never…ever read her. Even a few days ago when she wrote a piece that was supposed to be good…I wouldn’t read it. Today she talks about Hillary, and since it was discussed on various other blogs, that she questions Hillary in 2016 being inevitable, I had to break down and read it.

    Don’t Tread on Us – NYTimes.com

    This from a woman that shit all over Hillary…and those of us who supported her in 08. She still is sticking with her golden boy:

    The attempt by Republican men to wrestle American women back into chastity belts has not only breathed life into President Obama, it has roused and riled Hillary. And that could turn out to be the most dangerous thing the wildly self-destructive G.O.P. leaders have done.

    Breathed life? Fuck no. I got two words for Ms. Dowd, Stupak Agreement. Nuff said.
    But that is just my opinion.

    • Woman Voter says:

      For shame, for shame, to think that Dowd is still pushing that Obama is a better FeMAN than Hillary Clinton, after he signed the President Obama Stupak Executive Order while Dowd, Nancy Pelosi, Donna Brazile and Oprah sat quietly makes me mad!

      Sad, but the women claiming the feminist mantel help to make fun of Palin, while continuing to attack Hillary…in essence they DON’T WANT WOMEN IN POLITICS, they are worse than the Santorums / Limbaughs because they hide within the group while attacking.

    • maddie says:

      Mine too, Minkoff, Minx.

      By the way, I attended the Planned Parenthood event, Ralphb spoke of earlier.
      Sad to say, it seemed like a under enthused pep rally, hidden away in a parking lot behind a huge planned parenthood bus which was parked across the street from the Capitol. No march, no real protest..just a few speakers and an instruction to text a message to Governor Perry because they were “all out of petitions”. Better than nothing, I guess, but nowhere near being audacious.

      And in regards to Obama and his supporters newfound love and protection of women…suffice to say at the same “rally”, when asked by a woman who I would vote for if it came down to Romney and Obama, I said “well I’d either vote for Romney or write-in Hillary. As she was pondering that comment, I followed up with “I’d vote for the Devil over Obama” after what the DNC did in 2008..we’ve got to teach them a lesson”. Needless to say, she said ohh, ok nice to meet you and left quickly.

      And yes, I will cut off my nose to spite my face, not that Dowd cares.

      • The Rock says:

        HONK!! HONK!! HONK!!!

        Hillary 2012

      • ralphb says:

        Well, then I don’t give a flying fuck either. I do care about the poor people who will be denied health care or other basic services but, what the fuck, so long as you people get to vote for spite I’m sure they will understand.

        But I personally think it’s the stupidest fucking thing I’ve come across in a long time not to mention just pure fucking selfish. Teach them a lesson my ass.

        • dakinikat says:

          I could never vote for Mitt Romney. He has been going around the country saying things that are anathema to me. He promised this week to completely defund planned parenthood. There is no way this man gets my vote. He lies. He says whatever he has to get votes. He’s been on all sides of every issue multiple times. I’d rather vote for a rat. They have more integrity. The only thing a vote for Mitt Romney shows is you don’t care about anybody but the very wealthy in this country or you’ve been take in. I can’t vote against everything I believe in.

        • Minkoff Minx says:

          I want to respond to these comments…but don’t have the time now to get it done. Will try later tonight…

      • northwestrain says:

        Two CON MEN running for Prez — both lie all the time.

        Thankfully for me I do NOT have to vote for either MCP. Certified Male Chauvinist Pig.

        The Stupak executive order — that is one of the reasons. If 0bama is asked to choose between the religious wing nuts and women’s right — he will choose the male chauvinist pig/patriarchy.

      • Woman Voter says:

        If it come down to either or, I will vote for Obama, but not Biden, we should send them a message, because what they did in 2008 was wrong and President Obama Stupak Executive Order is a fact of where he stands and it is not with us. I am still waiting for “Dreams Of My Mother”, but no such book yet…

    • The Rock says:

      I threw up a little as I read her op-ed.

      Asshat.

      Hillary 2012