“To say that the President has the right to kill citizens without due process is really to take the constitution and to tear it up into as many little pieces as you can and then burn it and step on it.”
What amazes me most whenever I write about this topic is recalling how terribly upset so many Democrats pretended to be when Bush claimed the power merely to detain or even just eavesdrop on American citizens without due process. Remember all that? Yet now, here’s Obama claiming the power not to detain or eavesdrop on citizens without due process, but to kill them; marvel at how the hardest-core White House loyalists now celebrate this and uncritically accept the same justifying rationale used by Bush/Cheney (this is war! the President says he was a Terrorist!) without even a moment of acknowledgment of the profound inconsistency or the deeply troubling implications of having a President — even Barack Obama — vested with the power to target U.S. citizens for murder with no due process.
As Dakinikat posted in the comments to Minx’s evening post, a second U.S. citizen who was not on Obama’s assassination list was also murdered along with al-Awlaki. From bmaz at Emptywheel:
Awlaki was killed by a drone delivered Hellfire missile, via a joint CIA and JSOC operation, in the town of Kashef, in Yemen’s Jawf province, approximately 140 kilometres east of Sanaa, Yemen’s capital. But not only Awlaki was killed, at least three others, including yet another American citizen, Samir Khan, were killed in the strike.
That’s right, not just one, but two, Americans were summarily and extrajudicially executed by their own government today, at the direct order of the President of the United States. No trial, no verdict, just off with their heads. Heck, there were not even charges filed against either Awlaki or Khan. And it is not that the government did not try either, there was a grand jury convened on Khan, but no charges. Awlaki too was investigated for charges at least twice by the DOJ, but non were found.
But at least Awlaki was on Barrack Obama’s “Americans That Are Cool to Kill List”. Not so with Samir Khan. Not only is there no evidence whatsoever Khan is on the classified list for killing (actually two different lists) my survey of people knowledgeable in the field today revealed not one who believed khan was on any such list, either by DOD or CIA.
So, the US has been tracking scrupulously Awlaki for an extended period and knew with certainty where he was and when, and knew with certainty immediately they had killed Awlaki and Khan. This means the US also knew, with certainty, they were going to execute Samir Khan.
I can’t even begin to describe how sickened I am by these murders of American citizens. President Obama is a murderer and a tyrant who is destroying the last vestiges of the Constitution of the United States. At least I don’t have to live with the horror of having voted for this evil man.
I wrote a blog post a while back about heaven having fjords. I’m very much interested in economics from a development standpoint so it’s always worthwhile checking out the top performers in the world for lessons. It is also quite apparent when you do that Libertarian and Republican memes fail and fail badly. It’s probably why we never hear these things in corporate media.
Societies are better when the pull together instead of pull apart. The best performing countries in economics are the same countries that have a high commitment to public education and society at large. The high performers–in economics, in health, and in education–are the Scandavian countries with their highly progressive tax rates, intense regulation of commerce and harmful activities and emphasis on making sure the rising tide rises all the boats rather than sinking a huge number of them to the benefit of the mega yachts. These are also countries with parliamentary systems which makes them highly democratic. They’ve been winning consistently with the advent of the global economy. The US has lost its position as leader of the developed nations and is moving way down into the losing positions below still developing nations. We could learn some lessons from Scandinavia.
Here’s Jeffrey Sachs at Project Syndicate with some things to think about in that vein. He has written a new book called The Price of Civilization which basically outlines the missteps that we’ve taken that were primarily started as a result of the election of Ronald Reagan. For some reason, many Americans don’t want to pay for some very simple modern facilities like roads, electric grids, airports, and railways. They prefer to buy junk from China they probably don’t need in search of happiness in the form of hoarding and consuming.
Rather than respond to globalization with more government spending on education, infrastructure, and technology, Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by pledging to slash government spending and cut taxes.
For 30 years, the US has been going in the wrong direction, cutting the role of government in the domestic economy rather than promoting the investments needed to modernize the economy and workforce. The rich have benefited in the short run, by getting massive tax breaks. The poor have suffered from job losses and cuts in government services. Economic inequality has reached a high not seen since the Great Depression.
These adverse trends have been exacerbated by domestic politics. The rich have used their wealth to strengthen their grip on power. They pay for the expensive campaigns of presidents and congressmen, so presidents and congressmen help the rich – often at the expense of the rest of society. The same syndrome – in which the rich have gained control of the political system (or strengthened their control of it) – now afflicts many other countries.
Sweden–as an example other than Norway who can use their oil to leverage their improvements–has been called an economic miracle. After feeling the global recession, they are now growing GDP at rates that are twice to three times the averages of most industrial countries. They are growing 5 times fasting than the US. So, look at their numbers there on the CIA Factbook and marvel where under the poverty rate comes the label: not applicable. Sweden blends capitalism with a social democracy in a way that makes the swedes the 6th most prosperous country on the planet. They are above the US who is number 10. They are behind Norway, Denmark, Finland, Australia and New Zealand. They are number 23 in GDP per capita The US is number 11. They are also highly globally competitive ranking #3 in Global Competitiveness Index after Finland and Switzerland. The US is number 1o.
The Swedes are number 9 on the human development index. We are number 4. Norway is number 1. Sweden has high marginal tax rates (sometimes over 70%), very powerful unions, immigrants, and generous vacations and work weeks. Under Republican fairy tales, Sweden and Norway should be worse off than Haiti. Rather than looking at countries that are achieving great things and leaving us in the dust, we are grasping at a rigid ideology that is designed to tank us.
I haven’t read the Sachs book but I’m definitely putting it on my reading list. You may recall that this is also something Fareed Zakaria examines in his TV show, in books, and at TIME magazine. Here’s a good summary from a recent Time article.
The following rankings come from various lists, but they all tell the same story. According to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), our 15-year-olds rank 17th in the world in science and 25th in math. We rank 12th among developed countries in college graduation (down from No. 1 for decades). We come in 79th in elementary-school enrollment. Our infrastructure is ranked 23rd in the world, well behind that of every other major advanced economy. American health numbers are stunning for a rich country: based on studies by the OECD and the World Health Organization, we’re 27th in life expectancy, 18th in diabetes and first in obesity. Only a few decades ago, the U.S. stood tall in such rankings. No more. There are some areas in which we are still clearly No. 1, but they’re not ones we usually brag about. We have the most guns. We have the most crime among rich countries. And, of course, we have by far the largest amount of debt in the world.
We’re in the process of watching the Cat Food Commission Redux set our priorities for our future and its basically an agenda meant to downsize the American Dream for every one except the Mega Wealthy. I hope that the Cheddar Revolution and the Occupy Wall Street movement turn into an American Spring Movement. We have to regain the positive momentum towards modernity before the powers that be force us all back into a pre-civil war paradigm of laws, economic servitude, and society.
Meanwhile, as I write about these healthy economies, 90% of US citizens say our economy stinks and they are pretty unhappy about it. Its time to look at some best practices of other countries and dump the ideologues that keeping making the wrong decisions for us.
I can hardly believe we’re headed into the last quarter of 2011. Such a year we’ve had!
So, the GOP is going after some of the things for which I will happily contribute tax dollars. They’ve got some pretty whacked values as far as I’m concerned.
Setting a collision course with Democrats that could drag out for months, House Republicans on Thursday unveiled plans to cut federal money for job training, heating subsidies and grants to better-performing schools.
The draft measure for labor, health and education programs also seeks to block implementation of President Barack Obama’s signature health care law, cut off federal funds for National Public Radio and Planned Parenthood, and reduce eligibility for grants for low-income college students.
Democrats and tea party Republicans opposed the bill, blocking it from advancing through even the easy initial steps of the appropriations process on Capitol Hill. Instead of moving through the Appropriations Committee and the House as a whole, the $153 billion measure is instead expected to be wrapped into a larger omnibus spending bill this fall or winter that would fund the day-to-day operating budgets of Cabinet agencies.
Negotiations between Republicans controlling the House, the Democratic Senate and the White House are sure to be arduous. The measure is laced with conservative policy “riders” opposed by Democrats that would affect worker protections under federal labor laws and block the Education Department from enforcing rules on for-profit colleges that are often criticized for pushing students to take on too much debt.
“It looks like we’re in for a long, difficult process,” said Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn.
House Appropriations Committee Chairman Harold Rogers, R-Ky., said excessive and wasteful spending over the years had put many programs and agencies on “an irresponsible and unsustainable fiscal path.”
Actually all of those Dubya Tax cuts and wars and letting Wall Street Run amok with speculation instead of investment is what put us on that “irresponsible and unsustainable fiscal path” and most of them voted for all of it. I’m not willing to bail out any more of their donor base with my hard earned dollars by defunding the future of our children. What on earth can we do about these evil people and the feckless dems that won’t fight them?
The court fights over the new health care law have been stepped up and SCOTUS has come into play in a big way. Which of the justices are likely to uphold AEIcare-cum-ChafeeCare-cum-DoleCare-cum-RomneyCare-cum-Obamacare?
The four more liberal justices on the court — Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Obama appointees Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan — should have no trouble reading the Constitution as bestowing broad powers on the federal government to regulate all manner of commerce. Although the court in recent years has pinched back congressional efforts to use the Commerce Clause to promulgate laws prohibiting guns near schools and those targeting violence against women, these were clearly non-commercial activities and quite different from the health-care law and its regulation of the medical insurance marketplace. Stronger and more directly applicable precedents remain, in which the court blessed the government’s regulation of wheat and marijuana production because these activities had an impact on interstate commerce.
The marijuana case (known formally as Gonzales v. Raich) may be particularly important because two of the more conservative justices — Antonin Scalia and Anthony Kennedy — joined with their more liberal colleagues to uphold the law under the government’s Commerce Clause powers.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Samuel A. Alito — both George W. Bush appointees — shouldn’t be counted out either. Roberts and Alito joined an opinion in 2010 that recognized the government’s “broad authority” to enact a civil detention scheme for sexual predators under a different constitutional provision. This provision allows federal lawmakers “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper” to uphold the powers assigned to Congress — including the power to regulate interstate commerce.
Michelle Bachmann’s campaign is running out of cash. Even the NY Post thinks she may not make it to the Iowa Caucuses.
Will Michele Bachmann make it to Iowa? Insiders are whispering that the Tea Party darling’s financials are grim and she may be out of the race before she makes it to the Iowa caucus in February, even though she has a strong base in the state. Sources tell us say Bachmann’s skeletal staff are holding their collective breath until the deadline to disclose her fundraising report on Oct. 15. Meanwhile, we hear a computer vendor has called her campaign headquarters threatening to shut down the power due to an outstanding bill. Sources say she had about $400,000 at the beginning of September, but also stacks of bills. “She does not like to ask for money. She should have been focusing on big donors about three months ago,” a source said. “She’s only cultivated low dollar donors with direct mailings and that’s hurt her.” But at a rally in Virginia yesterday, Bachmann declared that she does not intend to back out of the race. “We intend to be the comeback kid in this race,” she said. Her rep said, “None of that is true.”
There’s a two part series at Bloomberg written by Collin Woodard on how the U.S. is really a country of regions. Part One is here. Part Two is here. It’s a really interest read and something I have thought about for some time as I’ve tried to find some place in this country where I can live in peace. For one, I’m trying to leave any region that’s described as bible buckle, bible belt, or bible anything!
Forget the state boundaries. Arbitrarily chosen, they often slash through cohesive cultures, creating massive cultural fissures in states like Maryland, Oregon and New York. Equally burdensome are the regional designations with which we try to analyze national politics — the Northeast, West, Midwest and South. They’re illusions masking the real forces driving the affairs of our sprawling continent: the 11 regional cultures of North America.
These 11 nations — Yankeedom, Tidewater, New Netherland, New France, Deep South, Greater Appalachia, the Midlands, First Nation, the Far West, the Left Coast, El Norte — have been hiding in plain sight throughout our history. You see them outlined on linguists’ dialect maps, cultural anthropologists’ maps of material culture regions, cultural geographers’ maps of religious regions, campaign strategists’ maps of political geography and historians’ maps of the patterns of settlement across the continent. I’m not the first person to have recognized the importance of these regional cultures. In 1969, Kevin Phillips, then a Republican campaign strategist, identified the distinct boundaries and values of several of these nations and used them to accurately prophesize the Reagan Revolution in his “Emerging Republican Majority,” a political cult classic.
More and more groups are joining the move to take on and occupy Wall Street. The New York Transportation Workers are the latest to announce they will join the protest today.
Occupy Wall Street has been picking up some decent support from unions in the past few days. Yesterday we reported that the Teamsters Union declared their support for protestors, and we also found out that the United Pilots Union had members at the protest demonstrating in uniform.
UPDATE: Verizon union workers have joined the protestors in NYC.
Today there are at least 4.2 million homeowners who, like Palomo, are late on their mortgage payments or somewhere in the delinquency and foreclosure process. The first wave of foreclosures came during the 2008 financial crisis as subprime mortgages given to weak borrowers imploded. Now the subsequent economic downturn and high unemployment keep housing depressed.
The administrations of George W. Bush and Barack Obama both offered incentives for lenders to help homeowners modify their mortgages. Those efforts haven’t achieved much.
And four years into the housing crisis, banks and their bill collectors, known as mortgage servicers, are still under fire for their response to troubled borrowers.
“I would say they are somewhat better than they were three years ago, but still woefully inadequate to meet the demand, given the still remarkably high levels of distressed borrowers they are attempting to deal with,” said Paul Leonard, director of the California office of the Center for Responsible Lending, a Durham, N.C.-based advocacy group.
From December 2009 through June, more than 1.6 million government-backed mortgage modifications had been started, but only 791,000 became permanent. These numbers remain well below the goal of 4 million modifications that the Obama administration set for itself.
That should give you a few juicy bits to chew on with some coffee!! What’s on your reading and blogging list today?
Former Bush Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld stopped by Boston on Monday night to sell his book. The event was disrupted by protesters who heckled Rumsfeld and attempted to make a citizen’s arrest for war crimes. From WCVB Channel 5 in Boston:
Several protesters tried to disrupt a forum with Rumsfeld at the Old South Meeting House, shouting and holding up signs as most of the audience shouted and booed them down.
“I went down in front and looked Donald Rumsfeld in the eye and said, ‘I’m making a citizen’s arrest,’ said protester Nate Goldschlag, a member of the group Veterans for Peace, who had to buy Rumsfeld’s book to get into the event.
“He lied us into Iraq. He lied about weapons of mass destruction. He lied about Saddam Hussein being involved in 9/11,” Goldschlag said.
Four demonstrators were dragged out of the hall by police and one person was arrested outside the building for assaulting an officer with a bullhorn, police said.
The event was sponsored by right wing talk radio station WRKO, which explains why most of the 300 people there were supportive of Rumsfeld. Unfortunately for the protesters, they had to purchase copies of Rummy’s book in order to get into the event.
It did my heart good to learn about this little demonstration–sorry I’m a little late finding this story. Here are some videos from and about the event:
Okay, it is Thursday, and tonight is the last football game of the season for my son’s team. So, I am writing this post early. Please help me out by posting links to any news that you like below in the comments.
Boston Boomer had some links this morning on Obama’s CBC speech, and I just wanted to add this one: James Clyburn (D-SC) “Cringed” When Obama Told Black Caucus to “Stop Crying”
As I noted the other day, Maxine Waters (D-CA) didn’t care for the President’s strange tirade at the Congressional Black Caucus’ award dinner — and as it turns out, neither did James Clyburn.
NORRIS: I’m curious about your reaction to the president’s speech. Now, he said many things that evening. We just heard the end of the speech, where he told people to put on their marching shoes, take off their bedroom slippers, stop complaining. Your reaction to that.
CLYBURN: Well, when I heard it, I cringed because I kind of anticipated so much of what came in the first part of the speech would get lost and people would be hanging on to those words.
Again, this is a completely unforced error by Obama. The White House has admitted this badgering-the-base stuff was a mistake in 2010 — and yet, they’re doing it again. Why?
Blue Texan also points out the frustration Clyburn is expressing when it comes to Obama’s lack of democratic principles.
….most of us have a style that’s a little bit different from the president’s, ’cause it’s his style to try to seek common ground or try to compromise, and he keeps getting the thumb in his eye. And those of us who come from a different era tend not to appreciate that style. [...]
Because if you are not going to get it done, what’s wrong with going down swinging? That is what people tend to want to see. They want to see you fight for the issues, even when they question whether or not you can you can be successful.
I found this next link about Georgia’s unemployment dilemma quiet interesting, considering Obama is all “ga ga” over the Georgia Works program. Georgia might cut jobless benefits to repay feds | AccessNorthGa
Georgia could cut jobless benefits for people who are out of work in order to repay the federal government for $721 million the state borrowed to help the unemployed.
Bills for the debt are coming due, and cutting back on jobless benefits is one option being considered to repay the money.
The state will send a $21.4 million check to Washington this week, the first payment on debt run up since late 2009.
Georgia Labor Commissioner Mark Butler says he’s considering several repayment options, one of which is cutting benefits.
Butler says he opposes raising or re-instituting taxes employers pay into the unemployment insurance fund. By next month, he’s expected to offer Gov. Nathan Deal and legislative leaders some options for repaying the debt.
Wow, Georgia sure does know how to run their unemployment programs! /snark
I guess I will continue to bust Obama’s balls, no offense, this post from Tom in Paine puts this question out on the table: Tom In Paine: Will Obama supporters ever admit he’s a fraud?
Every day I get emails from a variety of “progressive” groups and the theme is always the same. “Republicans want to destroy this”, or ” Republicans want to kill that”. They want money for their organizations or political campaigns and they want it based on telling you how bad Republicans are. Well, okay, they are bad. But they aren’t the problem. And never were. The real problem is that Democrats and these groups not only don’t want to face what the real problem is, they are afraid of trying to do anything about it.And that is that Barrack Obama is and always has been a political and policy fraud.
It is a rather long post so I encourage you to read the whole thing…Paine points out some obvious things that we have blogged about on Sky Dancing before..
So what are organizations like MoveOn and the PCCC really so upset about? That Republicans are acting like Republicans? The Republicans are only doing what the people who vote for them want them to do as repulsive as it may be. Is it the Republicans fault that Obama and congressional Democrats never did what those who elected them wanted them to do? Is it the Republicans fault that none of the Democratic initiatives, things that most people believed were best for the country, never got through? What is it that these groups want Republicans to do? Act like Democrats?
Here is a flash for Move On, the PCCC, Credo and Democratic candidates for congress and their donors and supporters — that is what elections are all about. And in 2008 the country threw the Republicans out of control of all 3 branches of government after 8 years of disastrous Republican governance, elected a Democratic president and gave him the biggest congressional majority any president had in 60 years. And what did the Democratic president do with the biggest congressional majority any president has had in 60 years? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. He said he wanted to work with Republicans and incorporate Republican ideas ignoring the fact that if the country had wanted Republican ideas they wouldn’t have thrown them out of office in the first place. Which is why Democratic voters stayed home in 2010 giving the Democrats the worst defeat of any political party in 80 years.
You may not have seen the latest news about the Energy Department:
And then there is talk going on (Hot Air link coming up…) that those two new loans are connected…I’ll post the links and let you sort it out…personally it doesn’t look good for Obama to be approving loans for a company that benefits Nancy Pelosi’s brother-in-law, which is supposed to create 50 or so “permanent” jobs. It is this kind of thing that bothers me…I’ll explain in a bit.
…one of SolarReserve’s “investment partners” is Pacific Corporate Group, through its Clean Energy and Technology Fund. And PCG’s executive director is Ron Pelosi — brother of Nancy Pelosi’s husband. Suddenly, this deal makes a lot more sense than spending $737 million for forty-five jobs.
I realize it is not a direct link to Pelosi…but after the Solyndra mess, it does seem a bit fishy that both of these new loans Obama’s Admin has approved of, have these kind of connections.
Here is another link to Daily Caller, another right-wing source, just bear with me a bit:
Those two links are discussing the connections with donors and the companies who got loans from the Energy Department. Take it for what it is worth…and who is the source for the information…but even outlets like the Enquirer get it right sometimes.
Here is more from ABC: Obama Fundraisers Had Ties to Green Firms That Got Federal Cash – ABC News
Several of Barack Obama’s top campaign supporters went from soliciting political contributions to working from within the Energy Department as it showered billions in taxpayer-backed stimulus money on alternative energy firms, ABC News and iWatch News have learned.
One of them was Steven J. Spinner, a high-tech consultant and energy investor who raised at least $500,000 for the candidate. He became one of Energy Secretary Steven Chu’s key loan program advisors while his wife’s law firm represented a number of companies that had applied for loans.
And the republicans are eating it up:
“There is great concern over political influence contaminating the DOE loan guarantee program,” said Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla), who chairs the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee. “The prevalence of fundraisers and bundlers scattered throughout DOE is cause for alarm and is a subject our investigation does not take lightly — we are looking into this and will see where it leads us.”The administration has repeatedly said that politics has played no role in deciding which companies received federal loans.
Congressional investigators have questioned why the Obama administration agreed to help the company in late 2010 when it was warned that the firm was at risk of collapse. Internal e-mails show federal reviewers initially estimated they could save the taxpayers as much as $168 million by letting the company go under in December 2010, rather than resuscitating it and allowing it to draw down more federal money.
Energy Department spokesman Damien LaVera confirmed Wednesday that the agency knew Solyndra had violated the loan terms but agreed to change the requirement to help Solyndra. The agency originally required that Solyndra make six installments of $5 million each, starting in December, to create a $30 million cash cushion for problems.
Here is my take on all this…if the Energy Dept can process and approve these loans, which will make some jobs, but it is in a limited capacity when you consider the 14 million unemployed throughout the nation…why can’t the Obama Admin secure loans or funding for Work Programs that will employ more people around the country, instead of a few within the confines of Green Energy? Green jobs are good, but people need to be employed now…not just in a couple of places, they need jobs all over the country. If shovel ready was just a nice couple of words to get a crowd pumped up, then I question the reasons for the Energy Dept’s approval of these loans that have inside connections to the White House. It may be nothing, but there is too many “deals” Obama has carried out that benefit his backers and campaign contributors.
I want you to read this editorial by Jesus Rivas: Kentucky voices: Liberalism a tactic, not principle, for Democrats | Op-Ed | Kentucky.com
Progressives are fooled because they fail to notice that liberal values are only a campaign posture for the Democrats and not true convictions. When they trade them easily they are not making sacrifices, they are just following their own agenda. It is we who make the sacrifice.
For instance, many people were outraged at how quickly the Democrats gave up the public option in the health care debate. The thing to notice is that the Democrats in congress receive superb quality health care paid for by the government. What they gave up without a fight was our public option. They protected the interests of insurance companies that pay for their campaigns, not the interests of their constituency.
People on the left were surprised to see President Barack Obama remove the ban on off-shore drilling. They said he had compromised too much too quickly. What they failed to see is that Obama received more than $100 million in campaign contributions from oil lobbies. So, he was simply returning the favor, or perhaps he was clearing up his line of credit for the next campaign.
Last but not least, people were angry to see the Democrats extend tax cuts for millionaires and viewed it as a sacrifice to negotiate with the Republicans.
But remember: many Democrats in Congress are millionaires. It is not a sacrifice when they are putting money in their pockets. What they sacrificed were our social safety net, our teachers, and firefighters that we can no longer afford.
Democratic pundits are quick to point fingers at the Republicans, who are blamed for all the incompetence of Congress since Obama took office. And believe me, I enjoy a good round of fun Republican bashing as much as the next guy, but in this case the fault is not the Republicans’.
As you read this Op/Ed from Rivas, think about the Paine post…
…Republicans are acting like Republicans? The Republicans are only doing what the people who vote for them want them to do as repulsive as it may be. Is it the Republicans fault that Obama and congressional Democrats never did what those who elected them wanted them to do? Is it the Republicans fault that none of the Democratic initiatives, things that most people believed were best for the country, never got through?
I am really interested in what you all think about the green jobs initiative, and the connections to Obama donors and Nancy Pelosi. It bothers me, it has that feeling of nepotism or payback…I don’t know, maybe I should not feel this way about green jobs, they are jobs that are desperately needed. But if funding can be secured so easily and quickly for these Green Loans and Green Programs, why is it so difficult for Obama’s Administration to get other works programs that will be beneficial in all areas of infrastructure, healthcare , education and the arts? (Wait, one area of healthcare has already got their benefits, the big insurance companies…they got their “nut” with Obamacare.)
I hope you all get what I am trying to say. I look forward to reading what you think.
I’ve got to go and cheer the Panther’s on…I just want to end with this article from my local paper, North Georgia News. It is about the game we played last week, which proves there is emotion in football. This was the first game the boys played a day after Derrick Whittle’s funeral. (His funeral procession was 6 miles long.) Nick is Derrick’s son:
Catch y’all later in the comments!
I was rather shocked this morning to read about a series of signs portraying the president as a crying baby with text balloons reading “Change me. I stink”, as a puppet of George Soros, and a Dunce in uptown New Orleans. I am always amazed when political disagreement turns ugly. I’m not going to print the offensive signs here because they’re a real test of our right to free speech. I wish people were as equally respectful of civility as some of us are of free speech rights.
Like the man or not, Barrack Obama is our president. We all have a compelling interest in disagreeing with his policies and the manner in which he carries out his elected office. However, the man is the President of our country and the office deserves respect. As much as I didn’t like George Bush and could poke fun of him and complain about him with the best of them, I would still curl my lip at things like watching him being hung or burnt in effigy. The Presidency is an important symbol of our country. We have an elected leader not a despot. I felt the same way when then Governor Quitteralla was hung in effigy in a front of a California home as a “Halloween” prank. You don’t have to like an elected leader, but there’s a way to disagree with them without resorting to displays of hate. There’s a place where free speech turns into hate speech and while it’s legal under our constitution, it’s should be called out for what it is.
“It disrespects the nation — and President Barack Obama represents our nation,” said Skip Alexander, as he looked at one of the signs. “He represents everybody, not some people.”
Dozens of protesters came by the house in the 1500 block of Calhoun throughout the day, demanding the sign come down.
“He wouldn’t do that to [President] Bush, I’m sure. It’s just insulting. It’s insulting,” said C.C. Campbell-Rock. “He’s going to have to take them down.”
“This is nothing put pure racism,” said Raymond Rock. “This is a disgrace.”
The home is owned by Timothy Reily, who declined to be interviewed about the signs. Former Mayor Ray Nagin showed up at the house and went inside to speak with Reily. He emerged later and would not comment on what they discussed.
Some neighbors tell Eyewitness News that Reily has been putting the signs up for months. Some of the protesters learned about the signs through a local radio station on Wednesday morning.
“He can put up a sign if he wants to. It doesn’t bother me,” said Harold Gagnet, a neighbor.
“I think it’s fine. It’s on his property,” said Katherine deMontluzin. “He can say whatever he wants.”
The signs have created such a firestorm of controversy, though, that police came to the scene– called in by City Council Member Susan Guidry. She represents the district where the home is located. Guidry said she was concerned about public safety and was trying to figure out if the sign was even legal. She also said she spoke to Reily, but didn’t get far.
You can watch the news reports and see the signs at the link above. The sign contains pretty much all the usual right wing hack memes like Obama is a Socialist. Did I mention that this is the wealthy side of town and there’s all kinds of diatribes up there on taxing millionaires too? My guess is that this guy is Teabot. I remember them waving signs about portraying Obama as a witch doctor when Dolecare got enacted. The city is trying to search through its zoning laws to figure out a way to take the bill boards down after trying to speak to the homeowner failed. The man definitely does have a right to his opinion, he has a right to express it, but aren’t there less hateful ways to do it? I frankly would be frightened to have a person like this living next to me. If he’s got that much anger towards a politician, you just never know what he’d do if an easy target showed up.